Difference Flashcards

1
Q

Who is the text associated with difference

A

Jose Medina

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the title of the text associated with Difference

A

Active ignorance, Epistemic Others, and Epistemic Friction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name the ‘epistemic virtues’ of the privileged

A

access to information, access to educational institutions, capacity to disseminate knowledge and to common epistemic authority, having a credible voice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an epistemic vice

A

a set of corrupted attitudes and dispositions that get in the way of knowledge. character flaw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an epistemic virtue

A

a character trait that constitutes an epistemic advantage for the individual who possesses it and for those who interact with him/her.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the first epistemic vice of the “privileged elites” and what is it a result of?

A

As a result of having cognitive benefits due to the access to education and more importantly mastering cognitive authority when speaking and receive no resistance or challenges to their voice. They presume to “know everything” and therefore are more prone to “epistemic arrogance.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What example does Medina use of the privileged elites having epistemic arrogance. (Historical example)

A

Alexis de Torqueville and the slave holders in the 1830s. This white southerner first habit he learns is to “rule without resistance.” The slaveholders have to be subservient to his voice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe “epistemic arrogance.” What time of “knowing” is this due to.

A

Letting one’s perspective go unchecked results in oversights, biased stereotypes and distortions. This is because they presume to know all there is to know from one’s own racial and gender perspective (often without realising he has one.) insensitive to contrary viewpoints and perspectives.
cultivated by the privilege of being “assumed to know.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the second epistemic vice that the “privileged elites” have?

A

Epistemic Laziness: there are entire domains that those in a position of privilege do not need to familiarise themselves with.
lack of effort and motivation to find out more about how racial or gender differences might have an impact on people’s experiences and standpoints.
carefully orchestrated and socially produced lack of curiosity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is laziness cultivated by…?

A

Cultivated by the privilege of not needing to know.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the example that Medina uses for laziness?

A

The not needing to know is shown in the domestic realm. Men who were powerful and wealthy would never bother to learn about the “housework, or “the care of children.” To change a nappy because they simply didn’t need to know as they would never have to change one.
This produces cognitive limitations in domestic aspects of daily life; certain things they cannot do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is another examples (not domesticity) that Medina uses to describe laziness

A

Another area put out of cognitive reach is the mechanisms of oppression that create marginalisation, social death - genocide. Although the machinery that punishes the oppressed is in the hands of the elite, not visible. In some cases when the machinery of oppression is particularly violent, it is made invisible to some members of elite because they are unable to handle it. Actually ignorant and surprised to hear about the oppression taking place which they benefit from.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does “not needing to know create? (A lack of…and the actual vice)

A

lack of curiosity about those areas of life or those social domains that one has learned to not concern oneself with.
EPISTEMIC LAZINESS, damages one’s objectivity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the ignorance differ with laziness and with closed mindedness

A

There is the luxury of not needing to know and the necessity of needing not to know. One is passive and one requires a huge amount of active ignorance to ignore.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Write the three Epistemic vices of privileged elites?

A

Laziness, Arrogance and Closed mindedness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the third epistemic vice that the “privileged elites” have?

A

Epistemic “closed mindedness”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is closed mindedness usually narrow?

A

usually involves the lack of openness to a huge range of experiences and viewpoints that can create trouble for your own perspective

18
Q

What is closed mindedness cultivated by…?

A

cultivated by a defence mechanism of needing not know in order to preserve privilege

19
Q

What is the example that Medina uses for closed mindedness? (The broad examples)

A

White supremacists who have deemed the voices and perspectives of members of other racist groups as unworthy of epistemic respect, not open to listen to them or learn as could result in their perspective changing. or the male who systematically undermines the authority of the women gives them no credibility to their perception, reasoning ect. by saying they’re hysterical, irrational.

20
Q

How can systematic closed mindedness be more narrow and specific?

A

to a particular historical event such as genocide or particular experience such as date rape. an event like the systematic practices of torture during the Bush administration.

21
Q

How is closed mindedness implicit yet explicit?

A

it is implicit attitudes and unconscious habits to ignore certain perspectives and experiences; defence mechanism to live with yourself. But explicit in actively managing oppression in regards to political and social policy; colour blindness and gender blindness.

22
Q

What is the issue with saying “When I look at you, I do not see gender: I do not see a woman.” “When I look at you, I do not see colour: I do not see a black person.”

A

This is not an achievement, intention might be that you do not see stereotypes with people, but just by saying it does not mean prejudices go away. the complete refusal to see colour of gender in a racist or sexist society involves refusal to acknowledge that these prejudices exist and how they affect you. Not seeing the person for who they are, for what has made their identity.

23
Q

Why is gender blindness and colour blindness usually only directed at the oppressed?

A

This is because ‘epistemic hiding’ needs to be directed at the oppressed so that the person who is making these claims can feel socially distanced from the racist and sexist ideologies and discrimination. Also if you don’t see prejudice than you also can not see the privilege that you experience as a result of being white, male, dominant.

24
Q

The epistemic vices of arrogance, laziness and closed-mindedness greatly contribute to the production of a particular form of…

A

ignorance called active ignorance.

25
Q

Define active ignorance ?

A

an ignorance that occurs with the active participation of the subject and with a battery of defence mechanisms.

26
Q

What is the opposite of epistemic arrogance…? and define it.

A

Epistemic humility = attentiveness to one’s cognitive limitations and deficits is a virtue as willing to qualify one’s own knowledge and other’s knowledge.
- Results from a humble and self questioning attitude, having the limits of one’s knowledge exposed and questioned leads to actually better learning.

27
Q

What did gender studies show?

A

Gender studies showed that the oppressed felt intellectually inferior as had a poor assessment of one’s cognitive capacities.

28
Q

What is ego skepticism and who does it affect?

A

a skepticism about the self and its capacities, a constant self questioning that leads to poor self esteem, poor self confidence and inferiority complex. Shown by Charles Mills (1998) who said the oppressed subject frequently questions whether they are a real person or deserve the treatment they are receiving.

29
Q

What is the opposite of epistemic laziness…? and define it?

A

Epistemic curiosity/diligence - more likely with subjects who identify what they cannot claim to know and are motivated to fill in those cognitive gaps; understand they don’t know everything.
- Another incentive is out of necessity, relations of oppression create cognitive needs, in order to satisfy one’s master. oppressed attain a surplus of intellectual curiosity and diligence.

30
Q

What is the opposite of Epistemic closed mindedness?

A

Epistemic open mindedness is the third virtue.

31
Q

Define epistemic open mindedness?

A

Oppressed subjects tend to feel the need to be more attentive to perspective of others. Have to acknowledge, respect and inhabit other perspectives as you don’t have the dominant perspective, forced to see reality through other people’s eyes in order to survive, often through the eyes of those whose perspectives matter more. You are aware of other standpoints unlike the elites.

32
Q

What is the opposite of active ignorance?

A

Subversive lucidity

33
Q

What does resistance mean? (Not epistemic resistance)

A

The dictionary definition of “resist” includes an active and a passive meaning: to exert oneself so as to defeat: and to withstand the force or effect of. What about withstanding epistemic force?

34
Q

What are the different kinds of epistemic resistance that subjects exert or endure in their cognitive lives?

A

There are both internal and external epistemic resistances, each can both be negative or positive.

35
Q

What is Epistemic resistance?

A

Responsibility for the resistances they contribute to maintain or to eradicate, for the ways these resistances are acknowledged or ignored…

36
Q

What does Iris Marion Young focus on in 2006?

A

a model of responsibility which focuses on shared responsibility.

37
Q

What kind of responsibility do we have?

A

We are not responsible for the family, community, or culture into which we are born, but we do bear a certain amount of responsibility (shared responsibility) for the marks left on us by different social groups, that is, for sustaining the influence of those groups in our acts and in our lives. Its the effect on us, not the actual attitude of the group, community ect.

38
Q

What can those not do if they are not critically aware of their own social identity and that of others…

A

cannot correct biases and achieve epistemic justice.

39
Q

Distinguish between active ignorance and epistemic lucidity?

A

The epistemic vices of arrogance, laziness and closed-mindedness greatly contribute to the production of a particular form of ignorance: active ignorance.
there are distinctive epistemic advantages that can be found among oppressed subjects:…there is a special kind of lucidity with a particular subversive force, which can be found among members of those groups.

40
Q

Explain how the virtues and vices are conditioned by social position? (How has the social position tended to produce these vices and virtues)

A

The key thing to look for is what is the argument he gives, of how the virtues and vices are conditioned by social positions.

41
Q

What is the other example for epistemic laziness?

the mechanisms of oppression that can create social death such as genocide…

A
Although the punishment of the oppressed is in the hands of those in power, its day to day operations, not visible to those who occur a position of power. In some cases the machinery that is performing this oppression is made invisible to protect some members of the privileged class because they maybe unable to handle it. 
They don't need to know about this oppressive machinery because it doesn't affect them. 
They have great access to this information but can be ignorant of the violence committed to maintain their privilege.
42
Q

What happens by converging the epistemic arrogance with epistemic laziness ?

A

it seriously compromises one’s learning potential and contributions to knowledge.