Did Hitler have a master plan for his foreign policy? Flashcards
To what extent did Hitler shape Nazi foreign policy?
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Who did Hitler keep which suggests long-term planning?
Until 1936, Hitler kept many Weimar foreign ministry officials from before he came to power. This could suggest long-term planning. His plan was to seem more moderate and thus be able to gain greater control of Germany.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): However, keeping foreign ministry officials could also show what?
Shows that he had no master plan and did not interfere/pose a foreign policy plan when he cane to power.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Territorial expansion
Nazi land gains between 1935 and 1939 are consistent with Hitlerโs ideas expressed in Mein Kampf, such as the policy of lebensraum and overturning the Treaty of Versailles.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Territorial expansion
However, policies such as eastward expansion could be argued to be simply broad aims rather than a master plan which he began to follow when he came to power.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Anschluss with Austria
The Nazis planned for each foreign policy move such as Anschluss with Austria.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Anschluss with Austria
Alternatively, it could be argued that Nazi takeover of Austria happened earlier than Hitler planned due to the actions of Austrian Nazis. While the move may have been planned, the Nazis took advantage of the circumstances of March 1938.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป for his foreign policy before 1933, which he pursued when he came to power in January 1933: Mein Kampf (1925) and Zwites Buch (1928)
Hitlerโs publications e.g Mein Kampf outlined his foreign policy aims which Hitler made reality after 1933. This included uniting German-speaking people; creating a lebensraum by expanding eastwards; and overturning the Treaty of Versailles.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: To fulfil his foreign policy plan outlined before 1933 what did Hitler do?
Systematically prepare Germany for war.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: What kind of policy did Hitler seem to follow?
Hitler followed a seemingly programmatic policy of German expansion in the east, by taking over Austria, the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia and Poland.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: What did Hitler envisage in Mein Kampf?
In Mein Kampf, Hitler envisaged an alliance with Britain and Italy and made several attempts to secure one e.g in 1936, he sent von Ribbentrop to Britain with the aim of securing an agreement, demonstrating evidence of long-term planning.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: From his appointment as chancellor in January 1933, what did Hitler begin to do that could suggest long term planning?
Began to reverse the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
- 1935 rearmament
- 1935 Naval agreement with Britain (35% the size of Britainโs)
- 1936 Remilitarisation of the Rhineland
- 1938 Anschluss with Austria
After the removal of von Blomberg and Fritsch, what did Hitler do?
Acted decisively to make himself commander in chief of the armed forces - his dominance over the military was complete.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Further evidence which suggests that Hitler prepared Germany for war to fulfil his long-term plans?
- Four Year Plan (1936-1939) - geared at developing a war economy
- 1937 Hossbach Conference - outlined three war scenarios
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Further evidence which suggest that Hitler pursued his foreign policy outlined in Mein Kampf?
- Alliance with Italy: 1936 Rome-Berlin Axis, 1939 Pact of Steel
- October 1st 1938: Took over the Sudetenland (3.5 million German-speaking people)
- March 1939: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
- September 1st 1939: Invasion of Poland
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป), Hitlerโs foreign policy was influenced by external factors, which led him to act opportunistically: How did Hitler follow and opportunistic foreign policy?
Took advantage of international situations to guide his policy e.g the timings of Anschluss in Austria in March 1938 was driven by the activities of the Austrian Nazis, as well as Italyโs preoccupation with the Spanish Civil War and domestic problems in Britain and France (such as the resignation of British foreign secretary Anthony Eden).
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Example of Hitler adapting his foreign policy in response to Germanyโs international position and strength at the time?
In Mein Kampf, Hitler claimed that Poland would serve as the gateway to creating lebensraum in the east. Instead, in January 1934, Hitler negotiated the Polish-German non-aggression pact to secure its eastern borders while the country developed militarily.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Mein Kampf argument
Mein Kampf did not put forward a programme for the Naziโs future foreign policy. At most, it was a series of broad aims and ideas.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Example of external factors preventing Hitler from carrying out his ambitions outlined in Mein Kampf?
Despite devising a military plan to โsmash Czechoslovakia by military actionโ in May 1938, Hitler delayed his invasion and settled for the Munich agreement in September 1938 in response to: Mussoliniโs unwillingness to provide military support; the threat of a military response from Britain and France.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): When Hitler first came to power, what was not changed?
When Hitler first came to power, German foreign polecat was not immediately changed - he kept most of the foreign policy officials like Konstantin von Neurath until 1938.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): Evidence of von Ribbentrop having influence rather than Hitler
- Von Ribbentrop who acted as an alternate foreign minister to von Neurath, negotiated the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939. He said this pact was โmy very own ideas which I urged on Hitlerโ.
- In 1943, Goering remarked that โthis war is Ribbentropโs war.โ
When did Goering remark that โthis war is Ribbentropโs war.โ?
1943
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): What did Goering push Hitler to be?
Goering pushed Hitler to be more aggressive and take Austria by force rather than diplomacy. Goering even told the tribunals at Nuremberg, โIt was less the Fรผhrer than I myself who set the pace.โ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Although von Ribbentrop had influence, evidence that Hitler still had a master plan. How?
Von Ribbentropโs suggestions are only acceptable when they were compatible with Hitlerโs personal vision.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): How did the German army influence Hitlerโs foreign policy?
The German army (the Wehrmacht) also wanted to reverse the Treaty of Versailles but they did thank Hitler was moving too fast.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ (๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป): What happened with von Blomberg and von Fritsch at the Hossbach Conference and what resulted from this?
They had sharp exchanges with Hitler. Within a year, they were removed from office. Evidence suggests it was Goering and Himmler who manipulated Hitler into firing them.
Further evidence that Hitler acted opportunistically with regards to his foreign policy, responding to external events and delaying his plans outlined in Mein Kampf:
- Took advantage of the weakness of the League of Nations
- Remilitarisation of the Rhineland (1936) in response to Italyโs aggression (Abyssinian crisis) and therefore diverted attention of the West e.g Britain, France.
- Munich Agreement - Hitler chose to sign agreement and not invade Czechoslovakia in response to Mussoliniโs lack of support.
- Appeasement e.g Britain Anglo-Naval Treaty - took advantage of Britain and Franceโs lack of intervention in his foreign policy e.g gave him the confidence to invade Czechoslovakia in March 1939.
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show he needs to make sure the Aryan race survives
โThe foreign policy of a folkish state must first of bear in mind the obligation to secure the existence of the race incorporated in this state.โ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show his aim of creating Lebensraum
โOnly a sufficiently large space on this earth can ensure the independent existence of a nationโฆโ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show his aim of creating Lebensraum/unification
โThe Nationalist Socialist movement must seek to eliminate the present disastrous imbalance between our population and the area of our national territory.โ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show his aim of overturning the T of V
โit ought to strive to eliminate the contrast between our past history and the hopelessness of our present political impotenceโฆโ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show he wanted to expand pre-1914 borders.
โThe demand for the restoration of the frontiers 1914 is a political absurdityโฆas to make it appear a crime.โ
๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป: Quote from Mein Kampf to show he wanted strategic alliances with Britain and Italy
โIf we look round for European allies from this point of view, only two states remain: England and Italyโฆโ
Historians have argued about the nature of foreign policy - what are the two viewpoints?
- It was derived directly from a coherent long-term plan personally engineered by Hitler and followed with logical, precise consistency to its inevitable military conclusion.
- Hitler was an opportunist who acted unguided, instead pragmatically reacting to changing circumstances.
Statement that Hitler was a master planner
Hitler was realising a foreign policy programme based on the ideological conceptions set out in Mein Kampf.
Statement that Hitler was an opportunistic gambler
Hitler did not have a premeditated plan: he lacked a clear plan and was essentially an opportunist.
Mein Kampf and Zwites Buch โ
outlined Hitlerโs foreign policy aims and set out his stufenplan which he made a reality after 1939 (overturning the ToV, uniting German people etcโฆ)
INTENTIONALIST: Hitler followed a programmatic policy of expansion into Austria, the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia
BUT Hitler had to back down over Austria in 1934 โ he was only able to unite with Austria after securing Italian support
* USAโs isolationism and the Neutrality Pact made Hitlerโs master plan possible
* Anglo-German Naval Agreement convinced Hitler expansion was possible
* Appeasement of GB and FR encouraged Hitler
(STUCTURALIST)
INTENTIONALIST: Hitler had a four year plan for war that put militarisation first
BUT he was not planning a long drawn out war, just small local war - was he just rearming for defence as he suggested in a speech to the Reichstag in 1933?
(STUCTURALIST)
INTENTIONALIST: Hitler left the Disarmament Conference in 1933 and began to rearm openly by 1935 and remilitarised the Rhineland in 1936
BUT the weakness of the League of Nations over Abyssinia in 1935/6 encouraged Hitler to rearm โ he felt confident GB and FR would not intervene.
(STRUCTURALIST)
INTENTIONALIST: In 1936 Hitler sent von Ribbentrop to Britain to negotiate an agreement with them (something he had outlined in Mein Kampf)
No structuralist
INTENTIONALIST: Hossbach Conference 1937 outlined 3 war scenarios โ but after 1943 as well as the destruction of Czechoslovakia by 1945
BUT this suggests Hitler had not intended war in 1939.
(STRUCTURALIST)
INTENTIONALIST: By 1939 Germany had 103 infantry divisions and 2000 fighter planes
BUT did this mean he just wanted expansion rather than war?
(STRUCTURALIST)
INTENTIONALIST: Hitler annexed Czechoslovakia in 1939 despite promises he would not at Munich. He broke the Munich Agreement of 1938
BUT appeasement encouraged Hitler โ he had been allowed the Sudetenland in 1938.
(STRUCTURALIST)