Did either party fail to perform its part of the deal, and if so, was that non-performance excused? Flashcards
Condition precedent
Required performance = non-occurrence of which terminates other party’s performance, occurrence of which triggers other party’s performance
(uncertain event which must occur before one party’s performance is due)
How do you satisfy express conditions precedent?
Strict compliance
How do you satisfy constructive conditions precedent?
Substantial performance
Express condition precedent
Parties agree
How do you satisfy an express condition of obligee’s satisfaction?
- Services that do not require personal taste = whether reasonable person would be satisfied (objective)
- Services that do require personal taste = whether obligee in good faith would be satisfied (subjective)
How do you satisfy an express condition of 3P’s satisfaction?
Whether 3P in good faith would be satisfied (objective)
Constructive condition precedent
Court applies based upon what is reasonable under circumstances
In interpretating, what do courts give greater weight to?
- Specific terms over general terms
2. Negotiated or added terms over standard terms
How do courts construe: against or for drafting party?
Against drafting party
How would a court construe terms like
- “if”
- “provided that”
- “on condition that”
- “subject to”?
As evidence of condition
What are some terms that could be evidence of an express condition?
“If”
“Provided that”
“On condition that”
“Subject to”
If performances can be due simultaneously, how does a court prefer to construe them?
To be due simultaneously
If one performance is expressly due at a specific time and other performance has no express deadline, when would court likely construe performance to be due? (At the same time, specific deadline first, no deadline first)
The performance with the express deadline is due prior to performance without express deadline.
What are the excuses for non-occurrence?
- Acceptance of performance despite non-occurrence
- Other party is bad faith cause of breach
- Impracticality/impossibility
- Disproportionate forfeiture
What is required for impracticality or disproportionate forfeiture to excuse non-occurrence?
Non-occurring condition must not have been a material term
If breach is not material, who can sue on the contract?
Either party
If breach is material, who can sue on the contract?
Non-breaching party
If breach is material, how can non-breaching party sue?
Limited to a remedy in quasi-contract with damages measured by excess of benefits conferred over/above harm caused
If breach is material, how can breaching party sue?
On the contract with any defects in performance recompensed by a setoff for the damages caused
Factors in determining whether failure to render performance is material
- extent to which injured party will be deprived of benefit which he reasonably expected
- extent to which the party failing to perform or to offer to perform will suffer forfeiture
- likelihood that the party failing to perform or to offer will cure his failure, taking account of all the circumstances including any reasonable assurances and
- extent to which the behavior of party failing to perform or to offer to perform comports with standards of good faith and fair dealing
Generally, when is a delay in performance material?
Only if time is of the essence (it operates to significantly deprive the other party of the benefit of the contract)
When is time is of the essence?
It operates to significantly deprive the other party of the benefit of the contract
In determining whether time is of the essence, what is the presumption?
Time is not of the essence, unless made apparent by contract or conduct
UCC perfect tender rule
Close performance is not good enough = buyer has right to reject any imperfect tender
Buyer’s right under UCC perfect tender rule
right to reject any imperfect tender
Under the UCC Perfect Tender Rule, when does the seller have an opportunity to cure and how long for each?
- Reasonable grounds to believe imperfect delivery would be allowable (ex. by past conduct) = seller gets reasonable time to cure
- Still time left for delivery = seller gets rest of contracted-for date to cure
Under UCC Perfect Tender Rule, what options does a buyer have for an imperfect delivery of goods?
- Reject the whole
- Accept the whole
- Accept any commercial unit or units and reject the rest
Under UCC Perfect Tender Rule, once goods are accepted, may the buyer reject the goods?
No
When does acceptance of goods occur?
- After reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in spite of their non-conformity or
- Fails to make an effective rejection after buyer has had reasonable opportunity to inspect them or
- Does any act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership
When may a buyer revoke his acceptance?
- If non-conformity substantially impairs its value to him and
- He accepted it on reasonable assumption that its non-conformity would be cured and it hasn’t been seasonably cured or
- Without discovery of such non-conformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either
a. by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance or
b. by seller’s assurance
Installment contract
One which requires or authorizes the delivery of goods in separate lots to be separately accepted
What can a buyer do if installment is nonconforming?
Reject nonconforming installment if
- nonconformity substantially impairs value of that installment and
- cannot be cured
What happens if nonconformity or default substantially impairs the value of the whole contract?
Breach of whole contract
Does the UCC presume single-delivery or installment contracts?
Single-delivery
When one party unambiguously declares to the other party that it will not perform prior to date of performance, what choices does a non-breaching party have under common law?
Non-breaching party’s performance is excused and may either
- await performance by repudiating party for commercially reasonably time or
- immediately sue for breach
When can a repudiating party retract their repudiation?
Before the other party materially alters position in reasonable reliance upon the repudiation
What is the effect of a retraction of repudiation?
Obligations of both parties are revived
Under UCC, if a party has reasonable grounds for insecurity, what can the party do?
Demand in writing adequate assurance of future performance and suspend performance until such assurance is received within a reasonable time no more than 20 days
What does failure to provide such reasonable assurance constitute? What is the deadline?
Constitutes anticipatory breach if assurance is not received within a reasonable time no more than 20 days
Between merchants, what determines reasonable grounds for insecurity?
Determined according to commercial standards
Does acceptance of any improper delivery/payment prejudice aggrieved party’s right to demand adequate assurance?
No
If aggrieved party notified repudiating party that he would await latter’s performance and urged retracting of repudiation, what action can he take?
- Await performance for commercially reasonable time or
- Resort to any remedy for breach
AND - Suspend performance (either way)
What are excuses for nonperformance?
- Breach
2. Failure of conditions (precedent or subsequent)
If a breach is material, is the non-breaching party’s duty discharged?
Yes
Material breach
undermines substantial benefit of bargain
Minor (immaterial) breach
slight deviation from the promised performance
If a breach immaterial (minor), is the non-breaching party’s duty discharged?
No, but can sue for damages caused by breach
When is performance due (in contract with conditions)?
Performance is due when there are no conditions or all conditions are satisfied/executed
Which is type (time) of condition is the default?
Condition concurrent
When are conditions concurrent due?
simultaneously
How does condition precedent affect the other party’s performance?
Triggers
How does condition subsequent affect the other party’s performance?
Terminates
Examples of conditions subsequent
Until
So long as
Examples of conditions precedent
On the condition that
As long as
If
What are the two types of condition (based on source)?
- Express
2. Implied/constructive
Excusing conditions (when is nonperformance excused)
- Hindrance/failure to cooperate in good faith
- Substantial performance (in implied/constructive conditions)
- Equitable doctrines of waiver or estoppel
- Impossibility, impracticability, frustration of purpose
Equitable doctrine of estoppel
protected by a condition before event was to occur and other party relies (statement made by a person)
Equitable doctrine of waiver
protected by condition made after even already failed to occur
Discharging conditions (when is duty discharged)
- Tender of, or actual, performance
- Condition subsequent
- Unforeseen post-formation changes of position
- Impossibility, impracticality, frustration of purpose
- Later agreement
Impossibility
Objective = nobody could do it
Impracticality
Subjective = doing it would be unduly burdensome
Later agreements that discharge duty
- Rescission
- Modification
- Novation
- Accord & satisfaction
- Statute of limitations
Rescission
Mutual promises to end
What is required for rescission to be enforceable?
Some obligation is still remaining
What is required for modification to be valid?
New consideration (common law) or good faith (UCC)
Novation
Mutual agreement of both original contracting parties to substitute one of original contracting parties for A STRANGER
Accord
agreement by parties to accept different performance in satisfaction of existing obligation
Satisfaction
performance of accord
What triggers the statute of limitations (when does it begin to run)?
Breach, NOT FORMATION
When contract itself allocates risk of loss, who bears risk of loss?
Whichever party designated by contract
What factors affect risk of loss?
- Contract
- Breach unrelated to this contract/breach
- Shipment vs. destination contract
- Merchant vs. non-merchant seller
Who bears risk of loss in shipment contract?
Buyer
Who bears risk of loss in destination contract?
Seller
With a merchant seller, who bears risk of loss?
Buyer upon receipt
With a non-merchant seller, who bears risk of loss?
Buyer upon tender