Deviant behaviour and motivation Flashcards
What is the self-maintenance theory?
The self-maintenance theory states that the decision to lie imposes a threat to an individual’s moral self-image, which is aversive. Hence, individuals are tempted to lie only rarely. Individuals engage in a form of ethical maneuvering, thereby securing additional payoffs while also trying to maintain a positive self-view. With all else being equal, dishonesty should increase with increasing benefits.
What are brazen liars?
Participants with a very high proportion of “yes”-responses, indicative of consistent cheating even for small incentives. To brazen liars incentives seem to be of little relevance as they will consistently cheat even if relatively small payoffs are at stake.
What are corruptible individuals?
Participants whose willingness to lie increase significantly with increasing payoff. Payoffs between €20 and €50 were sufficient to elicit cheating.
What are incorruptible individuals?
Higher incentives did not increase the willingness to lie for these individuals. There were still more “yes”-responses than the to-be-expected amount, so there was still cheating present (although limited).
In the second experiment this group was the honest group because the experiment required that they do not cheat at all.
What are small sinners?
Small sinners are willing to cheat for relatively small payoffs but refrain from cheating for larger sums.
Does everyone cheat for the right price?
Depends highly on individual differences in the display of dishonest behaviour (brazen liars, corruptible, small sinners, and honest individuals). A distinction can be made between ethical and economic people. Either a person will never lie (ethical), or he will lie when he prefers the outcome obtained by lying compared to the one obtained by telling the truth (economic). There are three different types of individuals: the income-maximizing subjects that cheat to the maximum extent possible, the partial liars that cheat to a limited extent, and the honest subjects that do not cheat at all.
What issues arise when describing human aggression?
- It is hard to interpret research findings and theories without a clear definition of aggression.
- Many laypersons and misinformed professionals use the term aggresssion interchangeably with other concepts.
- The term “violence” is often used interchangeably with aggression which leads to confusion and misunderstandings.
What different forms of aggression are there?
- Physical, verbal, and relational.
- Direct or indirect.
- Function to punish someone, or it involves a deliberate plan to harm another to gain the deisred outcome.
- Automatic response driven by self-protection mechanisms.
Aggression can be put on three dimensions:
1. The degree to which the goal is to harm the victim versus benefit the perpetrator.
2. The level of hostile or agitated emotion that is present.
3. The degree to which the aggressive act was thought through.
What is the frustration-aggression hypothesis?
This hypothesis suggests that the occurrence of aggressive behaviour always presupposes the existence of frustration and that the existence of frustration always leads to some form of aggression (research: not always the case).
How do learning theories relate to aggression?
Learning theories explain aggression in terms of classical conditioning. Children can be taught to behave aggressively by rewarding aggressive behaviour or removing a painful consequence after aggression. Children learn to discriminate between situations where aggression has a desirable consequence and when it does not and to generalize this knowledge to new situations. Aggression can be learned through observing and imitating others (vicarious learning of aggression).
How does social learning theory relate to aggression?
Making inferences about observed aggression not only increases the likelihood of imitating it, but also expands the range of situations to which the response might be generalized.
What is the excitation-transfer theory (ETT)?
Posists that if two arousing events are seperated by a short amount of time, arousal from the first event will add to arousal from the second. However, the cognitive label given to the second event will be misattributed as being relevant to all the arousal experienced, thus producing an inappropriately strong response.
What is the social information processing theory (SIP)?
Emphasizes the way people perceive the behaviour of others and make attributions about their own motives. A key concept here is the hostile attributional bias which describes a tendency to interpret ambiguous events as being motivated by a hostile intent.
What is the script theory?
Emphasizes the acquisition of scripts for behaviour through either direct experience or observational learning. Scripts define praticular situations and provide a guide for how to behave in them. In script theory, a person faced with a particular situation first considers a script relevant to that situation, assumes a role in the script, assesses the appropriateness or likely outcome of enacting the script, and if judged appropriate, then behaves according to the script.
What is the cognitive neo-association theory (CNA)?
This theory is based on the frustration-aggression hypothesis and states that aversive events produce negative affect, which is neurally linked to various thoughts, feelings, and behavioural tendencies that are in turn linked to fight/flight tendencies. Depending on personal characteristics, one response will eventually dominate.