Developmental Psychology Flashcards
Object permanence
Objects continue to exist even when they are out of sight
The occluded object retains its spatial & physical properties
The occluded object is still subject to physical laws
Piaget’s Theory
• Sensorimotor (0-2)
• Pre-operational (2-7)
• Concrete operational (7-11)
• Formal operational (11+
Sensorimotor Stage
• 0-24 months
• Learns about world through actions and sensory information
• Learns to differentiate self from the environment
• Start to understand causality, and form internal mental representations….
• Object permanence attained at 12 months, full internal representations by 18-24 months
When does reflex activity develop?
0-1 months
Stage 1: Reflex activity
Practice innate reflexes (ex: sucking, looking)
Sensorimotor Substages
• Reflex activity
• Primary circular reactions
• Secondary circular reactions
• Coordination of secondary circular reactions
• Tertiary circular reactions
• Internal representation
Primary circular reactions
̶ Simple behaviours derived from basic reflexes
̶ Start repeating behaviour (ex: thumb sucking)
̶ Focused on body
̶ No differentiation between self and outside world
Stage 2: When do primary circular reactions develop?
1-4 months
Stage 3: Secondary circular reactions
• “secondary” behaviours = own, not reflexes
• Start to focus on objects
• Begin to change surroundings intentionally ̶ Ex: kick legs, hit mobile, kick legs again
• Establish connection between body movement and external environment
When do secondary circular reactions develop?
4-10 months
Stage 4: Coordination of secondary circular reactions
• Engage with objects using a variety of actions
• Combine actions to achieve goals and solve novel problems
̶ Some evidence of means-ends behaviour
•Ex.movesomethingoutofwaytoreachandgettoy
̶ But, not insightful, driven by trial-and-error •Limitedbyexistingrepertoireofactions
• Lackflexibility
• A-not-B errors until 12 months ̶ egocentrism
When does coordination of secondary circular reactions develop?
10-12 months
Stage 5: Tertiary circular reactions
• Still repetitive or circular behaviours
• Discover the properties of objects and the environment
• Understand objects through trial-and-error
̶ Not yet inventive or insightful
• Improvements in problem-solving
̶ Experiment with new actions, modify unsuccessful actions
• Still lack internal representations
When do tertiary circular reactions develop?
12-18 months
Stage 6: Internal Representation
• Now has mental representation of the world
̶ Can think and plan actions
̶ Deferred imitation
• Solve novel problems insightfully
When does internal representation develop?
18-24 months
Deferred imitation (enduring mental rep.)
̶ Copying behaviour after a delay
̶ Not until stage 6
Typically a representation of a person, see if they can remember that representation after a time delay
Object permanence time scale
Begin to search for objects around 8-9 months
A not B error until 12 months
Critiques of Piaget
• Methods: Observational methods, often with own children ̶ quantitative, experimental data rare
̶ “clinical method” rather than standardized
• Confounds:
̶ Motor coordination and motor planning deficits
• Inability to perform coordinated actions (means-end) ̶ Memory deficits
̶ Communication – biased by cues • Younger infants could show some evidence if: ̶ Simplify procedure in experimental studies
• Change procedure
• Change the dependent variable
• Earlier than Piaget predicted? ̶ Basic object permanence
̶ Planning
̶ Deferred imitation
Critique of Piaget: A-not-B error earlier
• Piaget: don’t solve until 12 months
• Slight design tweaks can lead to different results. Examples:
̶ Butterworth (1977)
̶ Smith & Thelen (2003)
A-not-B error: Butterworth (1977)
• 3 conditions
̶ Normal design
̶ Covered but visible
̶ Visible and uncovered
BUT Errors in all 3 conditions, even when object covered but visible
̶ Reflects lack of coordination, not necessarily lack of object permanence
They’ve been reinforced to go to a certain side so may be difficult for infants to suppress that
A-not-B error: Smith & Thelen(2003)
One variation had infant stand instead of sit during “B” trial ̶ 10m old infants performed like 12m old
• Standing made the “A” position less salient
Which may have given the infant a chance to get out of the reinforcement rut
Methodological changes to Piaget studies
• Darkness rather than occlusion by other objects (visual vs manual search)
̶ Shown object within reach, lights turned off
̶ Infants as young as 5m will grasp for out of sight objects (Bower and Wishart, 1972)
̶ But still just performing “reaching action” (extension of ongoing action or reproduction of previous action)?
Bower (1982)
• Infants a few months old, shown object, screen moved in front of object, then returned to original position
̶ 2 conditions: Object still in place versus empty space ̶ Monitored child’s heart rate (infant doesn’t need to do anything)
• Piaget: too young to have info about objects that are no longer present = no reaction (wrong)
• Bower: faster heart rate (more surprise) in second (empty) condition