developmental area Flashcards

1
Q

background to Bandura’s study

A

predominant thought at the time was believed that children would imitate the way they had seen an adult behave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aim of Bandura’s study

A

to see whether children would imitate adult behaviour when given the opportunity, even if they saw these behaviours in a different environment and the original model they observed performing the behaviour was no longer present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sample and location of Bandura’s study

A

-72 children, equal gender split
-3-5 years old
-Stanford University

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what experimental design did Bandura’s study use

A

matched participants- each participant is paired with another participant with a shared characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the children matched on in Bandura’s study

A

-physical aggression levels
-verbal aggression levels
-inhibition aggression levels
-aggression towards inanimate objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the inter rater reliability of Bandura’s study

A

0.89

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how did the researchers know what the childrens prior levels of aggression were in Bandura’s study

A

children were observed prior to the experiment by both the teacher and nursery teacher and they made judgements on how aggressive they were rated on a five point scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

one advantage and disadvantage of using matched participants design in Bandura’s study

A

-stops prior levels of aggression influencing the results
-long process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

procedure in Bandura’s study

A

1) each child taken to a room with lots of toys eg stickers and tinker toys
2) model would punch Bobo doll in aggressive condition and ignore it in non aggressive condition
3) mild aggression arousal stage- children taken into a smaller room by the experimenter containing attractive toys, allowing the child to play with these for 2 minutes before being taken away
4) all 72 children taken back to main room and observed through a one way mirror, recording physical, verbal, partial and novel aggressive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

quantitative findings in Bandura’s study

A

-boys + aggressive male model = 25.8 mean physical aggressive acts
-boys + control = 2.0 acts

-girls + aggressive female model = 13.7 mean verbal aggressive acts
-girls + control = 0.7 acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

qualitative findings in Bandura’s study

A
  • ‘he’s a good fighter like daddy’
  • ‘that girl was just acting like a man’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

background in Kohlberg’s study

A

morality explained in terms of super ego, ego and id
or explained as a consequence of children observing and imitating models who behave in a moral way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

aim in Kohlberg’s study

A

wanted to provide research that would back up his theory of moral development inspired by Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sample and location of Kohlberg’s study

A

-75 boys aged 10-16 until they were 22-28
-Taiwan, Turkey, Mexico, Malaysia, Canada, UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

procedure of Kohlberg’s study

A

-every boy presented with moral dilemmas eg Heinz every 3 years during this time
-using the boys answers, Kohlberg ranked them from 1 (least morally developed) to 6 (most) , forming his theory of the stages of moral development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

findings of Kohlberg’s study - stages

A

pre conventional:
-orientation towards punishment- child responsive to cultural norms but behaves immorally if authority is missing
-self-interest orientation- child behaves in a self centred way

conventional:
-good boy/good girl orientation- child seeking approval from others
-orientation towards authority/fixed rules- child sees right behaviour as duty

post conventional:
social contract orientation- child does what is right based on law and personal values
universal ethical principles- child bases judgement on universal human rights of justice

17
Q

background to Chaney et al’s study

A

-In Australia about 1 in 4 kids have asthma
-compliance with asthma medication is at 30-70%

18
Q

aim to Chaney’s study

A

wanted to see whether the principles of positive reinforcement could be incorporated into an attachment spacer device to help train children in how to use their inhaler properly

19
Q

sample and location of Chaney’s study

A

-32 children (22 boys, 10 girls)
-recruited from GP clinics near Perth, Australia

20
Q

procedure of Chaney’s study

A

1) parents contacted by phone before being visited at home, they obtained written consent from parents before they filled in a questionnaire about their child’s current inhaler spacer device
2) parents were given a Funhaler to use with their child for 2 weeks - makes whistle sound and disc spins around
3) after 2 weeks, parents were contacted again and given another questionnaire to fill in on the Funhaler

21
Q

findings in Chaney’s study

A

-50% of children had achieved the desired 4 or more breath cycles per delivery with their previous asthma inhaler, 80% achieved this with Funhaler
-10% parents had said they were happy with child’s previous asthma inhaler, 61% said this about Funhaler

22
Q

background in Lee et al’s study

A

in individualistic cultures, people’s identities are defined by personal choices and achievements whereas in collectivist cultures people’s identities are defined by the groups they see themselves as a part of

23
Q

aim of Lee’s study

A

culture- to find out if the culture a child grows up in affects their views about truth telling and lying
age- to find out if the views of children about truth-telling and lying change as they grow older

24
Q

sample and location in Lee’s study

A

40 aged 7, 40 aged 9 and 40 aged 11 in China- collectivist
36 aged 7, 40 aged 9, 32 aged 11 in Canada - individualist

25
Q

procedure in Lee’s study

A

1) each child had 4 different stories read to them of 4 scenarios:
-child would behave antisocially, and then lie to teacher about what they had done
-child would behave antisocially, and tell the truth to their teacher about it
-child would behave prosocially, and then lie to their teacher about it
-child would behave prosocially, and then tell the truth to their teacher about it
2) for half the children, the stories had a social impact, and for the other half an environmental impact
3) the children had to answer 2 questions for each story:
-is what xxx did good or naughty?
-is what xxx said to their teacher good or naughty?
using a 7 point rating chart

26
Q

findings in Lee’s study

A

-children in China viewed telling the truth about something prosocial they had done less positively as they got older (begging for praise)
-children in China viewed lying about something prosocial they had done more positively as they got older

-children in Canada and China rated telling the truth about something antisocial they had done very positively
-children in Canada and China rated lying about something antisocial they had done very negatively, worse as they got older