Developmental Flashcards

1
Q

What is an attachment

A

An attachment is a strong long lasting emotional tie or bond to a particular individual (PCG). It involves efforts to get physically close to the attachment figure and leads to distress of separation (separation anxiety). A baby is capable of making this firm emotional bond at 7-11 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the learning theory

A

Children learn to become attached to their caregiver because they give them food. Learning can be due to associations being made between different stimuli (Classical conditioning) or behaviour can be altered by patterns of reinforcement (operant conditioning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain classical conditioning

A

It proposed that infants are born with reflexes to eat, an automatic inbuilt response. Infants become attracted to people who feed them and look after their physical need. The caregiver who feeds the infant becomes associated with pleaser through satisfying the main drive of hunger.

  1. Food is an unconditioned stimulus that produces an unconditioned response (pleasure)
  2. At first the caregiver is a neutral stimulus who produces no response
  3. However, because she is continually paired with the unconditioned stimulus (food) she slowly becomes associated with it until eventually mother alone can produce pleasure
  4. Mother has now become a conditioned stimulus and the pleasure she brings is a conditioned response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain operant conditioning

A

Learning by rewards (reinforcement). Once an infant has made an association between the caregiver and pleasure it will engage in behaviours that encourage the caregiver to remain present e.g. Smiling, crying. This is reinforcing so a baby learns to repeat its behaviour to get the same response. If behaviour gets an unpleasant result it is less likely to be repeated

  1. Any behaviour resulting in rewards will be repeated
  2. A hungry infant feels uncomfortable and is driven to reduce discomfort. When fed it feels pleasure (reward)
  3. The food is the primary reinforcer as it directly satisfies hunger
  4. The PCG is the secondary reinforcer as she provides the primary reinforcer (food)
  5. So attachment occurred because the child seeks the person who can supply the reward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

One strength of the Learning theory

A

+ substantial body of lab evidence to support the principles. This is well controlled, objective and replicable. E.g. Pavlovs dog (CC) and Skinner (OC - bird pecks certain colour and is rewarded) However this research has been conducted on animals and we might not be able to generalise the result to humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 weaknesses of learning theory

A
  1. CC predicts that the infants strongest attachment would be to its PCG but Schaffer and Emerson, in a longitudinal home-based observation of Scottish infants (60) found that’s less than half (39%) had attachments to the PCG. E.g. Babies became attached to the fathers and siblings even through they didn’t provide food.
  2. Harlows monkeys - found that physical contact, rather than food, is vital for attachment. Baby monkeys had 2 surrogate mothers (wire which provided food, and cloth mum). The monkeys showed a preference to the cloth mothers rather than the wire one providing food. This suggests theres more to attachment than ‘cupboard love’ (food)
  3. Suggests attachments can form at any time, but research suggests there’s a sensitive period
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 2 explanations of attachment

A
  1. Learning theory

2. Bowlbys theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Briefly describe Bowlbys theory of attachment

A

Attachment is biological and instinctive, it gives a newborn an advantage as it promotes survival. Therefore it’s more likely to grow up and pass on its genetic makeup. Attachment is an evolutionary advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 main points of Bowlbys theory of attachment

A
  1. Attachment has survival value - Bowlby was influences by research with animals, especially imprinting in birds such as geese. Infants who are close to their mothers are more likely to avoid dangers. Infants have an innate drive to become attached. They encourage care by social releasers e.g. Facial features, smiles and cries. Attachment behaviour is reciprocal and carers are programmed to respond to the infants needs, so an attachment is formed.
  2. The attachment acts as a template or model for later relationships - Infants form one special relationship (monotropy) and this serves as an internal working model that is the basis of all expectations and rules regarding later relationships (continuity hypothesis)
  3. There is a critical period - attachment needs to occur after 7 months to 11 months as it’s synchronised with crawling and exploration.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 positive criticisms of Bowlbys theory

A
  • Very influential - it’s changed the way young children are looked after
  • Evidence from animals - Lorenz’s study of geese suggests attachment is evolutionary and develops for survival
  • Evidence that attachments can only be formed if the PCG is responsive - Harlows monkeys
  • Evidence to support the continuity hypothesis that children who had strong attachments as children were better emotionally and socially as adults
  • Research into the ‘critical period’ - Hodges and Tizard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4 negative criticisms of Bowlbys theory

A
  • Ethnocentric - in many cultures the normal patterns of child rearing are different than Western practice e.g. Israeli Kibbutz children are looked after by a metapelet and may have several attachments
  • Shaffer and Emerson - suggests that children don’t always have one special attachments but multiple strong attachments
  • Kibbutz children and Shaffer & Emerson go agains the idea of monotropy
  • Temperament hypothesis - theory that babies temperaments affect the mothers responses and attachment. This isn’t considered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who developed the Strange situation

A

Ainsworth and Bell (1971)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the strange situation

A

Method of controlled observation to see how infants behaved under conditions of mild stress and novelty. Stress was created by the presence of a stranger (stranger anxiety) and separation from PCG (separation anxiety). The aim was to test the quality of the infants attachment by looking at exploration, reactions to the stranger, and reunion with the PCG. During this time reactions were noted by an observer who watched through a one way mirror and recorded the child’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How long was the strange situation and describe the Ps

A
  • Approx 20 minutes (3 mins each stage, apart from 30 second first stage)
  • 100 middle class USA infants from 12-18 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the stages of the strange situation

A
  1. PCG, infant and observer - observer shows caregiver and infant the experimental room and leaves
  2. PCG and Infant - caregiver sits and watches, infancy explores and plays with toys
  3. Stranger, PCG and infant - stranger enters, silent, then talks to PCG, then interacts with infant. PCG leaves the room
  4. Stranger and infant - first separation from PCG. Stranger interacts, talks and plays with infant
  5. PCG and infant - first reunion. PCG returns, stranger leaves. PCG greets, comforts, settles infant then leaves
  6. Infant alone - second separation
  7. Stranger and infant - stranger enters and interacts
  8. PCG and infant - second reunion. PCG enters, greets infant and picks up infant. Stranger leaves quietly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name and describe the 3 types of attachment found by Ainsworth and Bell in the strange situation

A
  1. Securely attached (70% USA infants) - infant explores, plays happily, uses PCG as a secure base, shows moderate distress when separated from PCG, goes to her for comfort when she returns, easily soothed. Clearly prefers PCG to stranger
  2. Insecure avoidant (20% USA infants) - pays little attention to PCG, shows little concern when PCG leaves, PCG tends to ignore the infant, little stranger anxiety, makes little effort to renew contact with PCG or actively avoids contact (looking and turning away), shows no real preference
  3. Insecure resistant (10% USA infants) - very distressed when separated from PCG, difficult to comfort on reunion, infant rushes to PCG but may show anger and struggle to get down, PCG behaviour inconsistent (sometimes rejecting and angry, sometimes overly sensitive and responsive), tends to ignore stranger, resists attempts to interact, difficulty moving away from caregiver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Which type of attachment is associated with healthy development in terms on emotions, social and cognitive development

A

Secure attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ainsworth found the sensitively (maternal sensitivity hypothesis) of the PCG is of crucial importance. Explain the behaviours of the PCGs in the 3 types of attachment found

A
  • secure - very sensitive, responded in an emotionally expressive way, encourages exploration and interaction if the child is unsure
  • avoidant - uninterested, ignoring them, self-centred and rigid
  • resistant - behaved inconsistently, suffocating in their behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

2 positive criticisms to the strange situation

A
  • easily replicated because of its systematic procedures. This facilitates easy comparison between Ps and makes it easier to identify behaviours and grands. The replicability also means the observation can be repeated to check for reliability
  • non experimental method but based in a lab for control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

7 negative criticisms of the strange situation

A
  • Ethnocentric - Ps from USA, lowers generalisability to wider population
  • Conducted in 1971 - research may now be dates as child rearing practices have changed
  • Harm to Ps - ethics. Causing Ps to become distressed
  • Small sample of 100 - lowers pop validity
  • May not be a valid measure of attachment - children who have been in day care may show insecurely attached behaviour as they’re used to being left by PCG. The SS may be testing the child’s relationship rather than a characteristic that has developed in the child as a result of attachment
  • Kagan - criticised the maternal sensitivity hypothesis and proposed the temperament hypothesis
  • Too simplistic to say behaviour can be divided into 3 types - Ainsworth later discovered the ‘disorganised’ attachment (very rare, abused or parent pathology, child dazed and confused)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Name the cross-cultural studies which support Bowblys view that attachment is universal, and describe the studies

A
  • Fox (1977) - studies Israeli Kibbutzim where children spent a large proportion of time looked after by a metapelet in a communal children’s centre. Tests in the SS showed the mother was still the primary attachment figure despite shared care
  • Tronik (1992) - studied an African tribe, the Efe, from Zaire where infants are looked after and breast fed by different women, although they did sleep with their own mother at night. At 6 months the infants still showed one primary attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Name the cross-cultural studies that suggest there are important cultural differences, and describe them

A
  • Takahashi (1990) - used the SS to study 60 middle class Japanese infants and their mothers. In comparison with Ainsworths research in the US he found similar rates of secure but no avoidant and a higher rate of resistant. The Japanese infants were particularly distressed at being left alone which may be because they’re rarely separated from their PCG. This may lead them to appearing insecurely attached
  • Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg (1988)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe the method of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburgs study on cultural differences

A

Used a meta-analysis, comparing the results of 32 studies using the SS in 8 different countries, including West Germany (3 studies), Israel (2 studies), Japan (2 studies), and USA (18 studies). The aim of the study was to see whether cross-cultural differences in attachments exist, and whether there were any differences in attachments within cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Describe the findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburgs study

A
  • The variation within a culture was 1.5% greater than the variation between cultures
  • In all cultures the highest % of children were securely attached
  • There were variations between cultures
             SA.     IA.      IR 
USA.    65%.  21%.  14%
Israel.   64%.  7%.    29% (collectivist)
Japan.  68%.  5%.    27% (collectivist)
WG       57%.  35%.  8% 

Israel and Japan have less avoidant and more resistant attachments than WG. Israel and Japan have similar % for IR but probably because for different reasons. Israeli infants are brought up in a Kibbutzim so aren’t used to strangers (stranger anxiety), and those in Japan aren’t used to separation from their mother (separation anxiety)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

4 negative criticisms of research into Cultural Variations in Attachments

A
  • SS may be unsuitable for classifying attachment in different cultures - it reflects the norms and views of US society. However in WG children are encouraged to be independent and this is interpreted at IA behaviour. Israeli children are not used to seeing strangers, this is interpreted as IR. Japanese children aren’t used to being separated from their mother, this is interpreted as IR
  • Its false to see each country as a single culture - there are subcultures e.g. Rural/urban
  • Similarities may be explained by the effects of mass media rather than innate cultural similarities
  • Aviezer (1994) - found that Kibbutzim system has changed, children return to their parents at night instead of staying in the Kibbutzim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How can disruption of attachment occur

A

Through Deprivation, meaning when a child has formed an attachment bond but then is separated from its mother. This might occur when the mother has died or when the child’s mother has to go into hospital, or when the child has to go to hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are the short term components of distress and explain them

A
  • Protest - an immediate reaction to separation involves crying, screaming, kicking/struggling to escape, clinging to mother to prevent her leaving. This is an outward, direct expression of the child’s anger, fear and confusion
  • Despair - calmer behaviour but the child feels inward angry and fear. The child may no longer expect the mother to return. They may hardly react to other peoples offers of comfort and instead prefer to comfort themselves by rocking or thumb sucking
  • Detachment - child begins to respond again but everyone is treated alike and superficially. When reunited with mother, child may have to relearn their relationship, possibly even rejecting her as they feel as though she had rejected them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Name and explain the one long term component of distress

A

Separation anxiety - characterised by extreme clingyness, detachment and demanding (doesn’t want to be left, doesn’t accept comfort and wants more from parents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Separation is likely to be most distressing……..? (6 factors influencing distress)

A
  • between the ages of 7/8 months to 3 years (Bowlbys theory). There’s a peak at 12-18 months (Maccoby, 1980)
  • for boys, although there are individual differences within genders
  • if there have been any behavioural problems (e.g. Aggressiveness) prior to separation
  • if the relationship to the mother has been too close
  • if the child has never been separated before
  • if there aren’t any other attachment figures who can provide love and care in the mothers absence
30
Q

What is the key study on disruption of attachment

A

‘John’ - Robertson and Robertson (1989)

31
Q

Describe the study of John

A

According to Robertson and Robertson, the boy John was ‘a sturdy, good looking boy who ate and slept well and said a few words. John and his mother had a quiet and harmonious relationship’ (expected for a 17 month old). John had never been separated from his mother before and became increasingly distressed from Day 3 of his 9 day stay in a residential nursery while his mother was in hospital. On day 9 when his mother came to take him home, John started throwing himself around and crying loudly. When his mother tried to put him on her lap, he struggled, screamed and ran away from her. Although john finally did lie quietly on her lap, he never once looked at her. When his father arrived, John escaped into his fathers arms, firing the course of the 9 days in the nursery John displayed all the components of distress as described by Bowlby (1969)

32
Q

1 negative and 1 positive criticism of the research done by Robertson and Robertson

A

+ high ecological validity - as films were naturalistic observations (real life events in a real setting) James and Joyce Robertson were meticulous in the way they designed the observational record in order to avoid any bias (ie. lack of observer bias) and the record is available for others to inspect
- Case study - these lack validity so may not be generalisable. Also these children may share certain characteristics that differentiate them from other children (ie British, or being from an urban community) and there is not appropriate to think that all children would respond in the same way

33
Q

How did Joyce Robertson care for the children in her care as a foster carer

A
  • cared for them in her own home
  • arranged for the children to visit their mothers in hospital
  • the children brought things from home (e.g. Blanket, photos) to maintain an emotional bond with home
  • Joyce acted as a substitute attachment figure for the children

These children ate and slept well, and welcomed their parents at the end of their stay

34
Q

What is Privation

A

A failure to from an attachment bond. This may occur when a child is raised in an orphanage or institution. This can link to developmental and social problems

35
Q

What are the 3 studies for Institutionalisation (Privation)

A
  • Hodges and Tizard
  • Rutter
  • Quinton
36
Q

What are the 2 studies of Isolated children (Privation)

A
  • Genie

* JM & PM (Czech twins)

37
Q

What was Hodges and Tizards study aim

A

Aimed to investigate the effects of failure to form attachment (privation) on later social and emotional development and to test Bowlbys hypothesis that lack of an continuous relationship between infant and mother figure in the first few years of life would have permanent long term negative effects

38
Q

Describe the Ps in Hodges and Tizards study

A

65 children which were placed in an institution when they were less than 4 months old. They had excellent physical care, but the children had no opportunity to form attachments with the staff, as each child had 50 different carers.

39
Q

By the age of 4 years what had occurred (H&T)

A
  • 24 adopted
  • 15 restored to their biological mothers
  • interviews and questionnaire (self report method) were conducted with children, parents, teachers and peers
  • comparisons were made with a control group of children raised in a normal home environment
  • the institutional children were more attention seeking and more indiscriminately affectionate then non-institutional children
40
Q

What had occurred at the age of 8 (H&T)

A
  • most children had formed close attachments with parents
  • teachers reported the children from both groups were more attention seeking from adults (a sign of disinhibited attachment) and less successful in making friends
41
Q

What had occurred at the age of 16 (H&T)

A
  • adopted children were more closely attached than the restored children
  • all ex-institutional adolescents were less likely to have a special friend, to be part of a crowd, or to be liked by other children.
  • all ex-institutional adolescents were more quarrelsome and more likely to be bullies
  • all ex-institutional adolescents had difficultly in peer relationships. This suggests their ability to form relationships may have been damaged by early privation
42
Q

What was the conclusion of Hodges and Tizards study into privation

A

Children given good quality, loving environments (the adoptive families) can recover and form attachments. This goes against Bowlbys maternal deprivation theory because the children did not show characteristics of delinquency, affectionate psychopathy and intellectual retardation which he predicted, despite their lack of early attachments. However, there was some support for his maternal deprivation hypothesis because the early privation did seem to have LT negative effects on children’s peer relationships at 8 and 16

43
Q

4 negative criticisms of H&T study of privation

A
  • attrition - worse affected people tend to drop out
  • small sample
  • longitudinal study and natural experience = low levels of control over extraneous variables
  • self report methods - social desirability bias
44
Q

One positive criticism of H&T study of privation

A

• natural occurring situation - high in validly, couldn’t be set up deliberately because of ethical reasons

45
Q

Describe Genie

A
  • found at 13 years old (2yo onwards)
  • Isolation, sever neglect, physical restraint (by father who may have thought she’s mentally retarded)
  • strapped to a child’s potty in a bare room, and tied in a sleeping bag
  • punished if made a sound
  • appearance of a 6/7yo
  • ‘unsocialised, primitive, hardly human’
  • made no sounds and was hardly able to walk
  • father committed suicide before trail
  • Genie never achieved good social adjustment (couldn’t function in the world) or language despite intervention and being placed with a foster family
46
Q

Describe the Czech Twins

A
  • twin boys JM&PM
  • first 7 years of their lives locked up in a cellar
  • mother died at 18 months went to love with father who remarried
  • very short, tickets, no spontaneous speech just gestures
  • cared for by an excellent foster family
  • by age of 20 were above average intelligence and had formed excellent relationships
  • both married and had children
  • age 29 - stable, no abnormalities, warm relationships
47
Q

Why might the twins have had a better recovery than Genie

A
  • they were younger when they were found
  • they had each other
  • Genie might have been brain damaged from birth
48
Q

Describe Quinton et al

A

Followed a group of women who had been reared in institutions. The women had extreme difficulties when they became parents e.g children more frequently in care, women were less sensitive and less warm with their children than a control group

49
Q

Negative evaluation of Quinton et al

A

It may not be early institutionalisation that explained their lack of parenting skills. It may be more simply that they had inadequate models for how to parent and this made them less able to cope as mothers

50
Q

Describe Rutter and his study on Romanian Orphans

A
  • 111 Romanian orphans
  • assessed them at 4,6 and 11yo
  • those who were adopted by British families before 6 months old have shown ‘normal’ emotional development
  • children who were adopted later showed slower progress, disinhibited attachments and problems with peers
  • suggests LT consequences may be less severe than once thought if the child has opportunity to form attachments
  • However when children continually fail to form at attachment then the consequences are severe
51
Q

Evaluation of Rutter (Romanian orphans)

A
  • difficult to obtain information about the quality of care in many institutions in Romania, making it difficult to assess the extent of privation in the early environments of the children in the study
  • attrition due to longitudinal study
    + used a range of methods to assess the children’s behaviour including semi structured interviews and observation to see if the child makes inappropriate physical contact. This makes the research rich and detailed
52
Q

Conclusions to effects of disruption, privation and institutional care

A
  • methodological difficulties - difficult to generalise from case studies and they cannot be replicated. Controlled experiments are possibly only with animals; studies with humans may be natural experiments where random allocation to conditions is not possible and children may be selected e.g. For adoption or fostering
  • children were in unstimulating environment
  • individual differences - temperament of children may affect later outcomes, some children may be more resilient than others
53
Q

what are the variations of daycare

A
  • Crèches, playgroups, childminders, day nurseries - out of home facilities
  • nannies - in home arrangements
54
Q

What did Belsky and Rovine study

A

Daycare, and Daycare and Attachments.
Compared the quality of attachment shown by young children who spent time in day care with the quality of attachment shown by children remaining at home with their mothers.

55
Q

Describe Belsky and Rovines method

A

Attachment was assessed using the strange situation (controlled = high ecological validity)

56
Q

What were the findings on Belsky and Rovines study

A
  • There was a greater risk of children forming insecure attachments if they had been in daycare for at least 4 months before their first birthday, and if they spent more than 20 hours per week in care.
  • large number of children in care developed secure attachments
  • however a larger proportion showed insecure attachment was found more among those in daycare
    >20hpw.
57
Q

What were the conclusions of Belsky and Rovines study

A

In certain cases children who spend time in daycare are more likely to show insecure attachments than those kept at home with mother

58
Q

2 negative criticisms of Belsky and Rovine

A
  • The children who have been in daycare are more used to being separated and therefore are less likely to experience it as stressful. Children’s ‘indifference’ may be independence and self reliance
  • Natural experiment therefore children are not randomly assigned into groups. Mothers who put their children in daycare may be different to mothers who do not
59
Q

What are the factors affecting daycare results

A
  • relationship with parents
  • how used the child is to being left alone
  • quality of daycare
  • ratio of staff to child
  • individual differences e.g. Shyness
  • Type of daycare
  • time spent in daycare
  • age of child when entering daycare
60
Q

How has research into attachment and daycare influenced child care practices

A
  1. Residential nurseries, such as the one studied in Robertson & Robertson, no longer exist - children like John would now be cared for by the father (increased paternity leave) If no relatives or friends were available the child would be placed in foster care
  2. The type of institutions studied by Hodges and Tizard have been closed - young children would remain with family or in foster care
  3. Increasing numbers of children in daycare - more mothers of preschool children now work. There have been efforts to improve the quality of daycare provision, including OFSTED inspection of all preschool provision
61
Q

In home care what factors indicate good quality care

A
  • more child orientated physical settings (fewer hazards, less mess, more toys, less adult decoration)
  • fewer younger children
  • more school like activities and individual attention
  • Caregivers less controlling and demanding
  • less time interacting with other children

Max 6 children under 8yo
Max 3 children under 5yo
Max 1 child under 1yo

62
Q

In daycare what factors indicate good quality care

A

• lower adult:child ratios

63
Q

Define Structural factors and Functional factors of child care, and who established these

A

Howes et al (1992)
• Structural factors - number of children present, the number of children per carer, the training received by the carers and the furniture and toys available
• Functional factors - the motivation of the carers, the sensitivity and warmth towards the children, the caregivers abilities to adjust to the child, caregiver-child attachment relationship

64
Q

What does high quality daycare include in general

A

Older children
• rich, varied and stimulating environment
• variety of activities, some structured, some unstructured

Young children
• small groups

All children
• qualified staff who are responsive to children with low staff turnover

65
Q

What effects can poor quality daycare have

A

Serious effects on social, emotional and cognitive development, and it’s is children from already disadvantaged backgrounds who are most likely to experience such care

66
Q

What is the Key worker policy

A

Replacement attachment figure care, for needs and builds up a relationship of trust. They respond sensitively which enables each child to feel secure and cared for

67
Q

What are the 3 studies of daycare and peer relations

A

Field, Clarke-Stewart, Shea

68
Q

Describe Fields findings into daycare and peer relations

A

Found that the amount of time spent in full time daycare was positively correlated to the number of friends children had once they went to school

69
Q

Describe Clarke-Stewarts findings into daycare and peer relations

A

Found children (150 sample from different forms of daycare) who had attended daycare (nurseries) could negotiate better with their peers (in family settings)

70
Q

Describe Sheas findings on daycare and peer relationships

A

Also suggested daycare can have a positive effect on social development. 3-4yo were assessed (videod - interobserver reliability, demand characteristics) for their social skills (aggression, rough and tumble play, frequency of peers, distance from teacher and nearest child) during their 10 weeks of attending a nursery school. One group attended 5 days per week, and the other attended twice a week. Both groups showed increasing social skills e.g less aggression and more interaction with others. The group that attended 5 days per week improved more quickly.

71
Q

Conclusion of the effects of daycare

A

It is difficult to find out whether daycare has any effects on children’s development and studies sometimes produce contradictory results. This is because so many variables are involved, including:
• the type of daycare
• individual differences - some children may find daycare harder to cope with than others
• the age at which daycare starts and the length of time spent in daycare
• quality of provision - high care = benefit, poor care = harmful. Helen Bee suggests this may explain many of the differences between research findings.