Development of attachment Flashcards
Who are the main researchers for the development of attachment?
Shaffer and Emerson
Aim of the study?
To investigate the development of attachment
Procedure of the study?
- 60 Glaswegian Babies
- Working class
- Children studied in their own homes
- Mothers asked to report the infants response to everyday situations (when separated across different situations and their intensity of protest
- mother asked to explain whom protest was displayed to
How was stranger anxiety measured ?
measured by assessing the infant’s response to interviewer at each visit
Findings of the study?
- As infant’s gets older stranger anxiety increases
- All 60 infants formed specific attachments by 1 year
- All 60 demonstrated stranger anxiety
- specific attachment develop faster than stranger anxiety
conclusions of the study?
Baby’s attachment development in four key stages
What is stage 1 called and at what age?
Indiscriminate attachment, 2 months
What is stage 2 called and what age?
Precocial attachment/ Beginnings of attachment, 4 months
What is stage 3 called and at what age?
Discriminate attachment, 7 months
What is stage 4 called and at what age?
Multiple attachments, 9 months
What are all the stages in order?
- Indiscriminate attachment
- Beginnings of attachment/Precocial attachment
- Discriminate attachment
- Multiple attachment
Describe stage 1
- newborn baby is predisposed to attach to any human
- responding equally to any caregiver
- babies respond similarly to all objects, but prefer social stimuli towards the end of stage
- Reciprocity and Interactional Synchrony begin to be established
Describe stage 2
- More social, prefer human company
- Can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people
- Accept care from anyone, do not display stranger anxiety
- Distress when separated from primary caregiver
Describe stage 3
- Formed attachments with their primary attachment figure (formed closet bond/intense relationship)
- role usually fulfilled by biological mother
- Display separation anxiety, shown by distress when separated from caregiver
- Stranger anxiety is shown
Describe stage 4
- consistent relationships with others lead to multiple attachments
- called secondary attachments
- distress shown when separated from these multiple attachment figures
A03 - Unreliable data collection
- Based on mother’s report
- some mothers may be less sensitive to infants protests and therefore less likely to report them
- may have given socially desirable answers
- create a systematic bias which would change the validity of data
A03 - Biased sample
- From working class population, findings may apply to that social group
- Sample from 1960’s - parental care has change, may not be bio mother
- stay at home dad’s quadrupled over the last 25 years (Cohn et al)
- If experiment conducted again they might be different
A03 - Challenging montropy
- Discussions relating to multiple attachments is whether all attachments are equivalent or whether one/two are more important
- Bowlby: infants form one special emotional relationship
- Subsidary to this are many other secondary attachment which are important as an emotional safety net or to meet other needs
- e.g. father/siblings
- Rutter argues all attachment figures are equivalent, all attachments being integrated to produce infant attachment type
- Suggests that Bowlby may have been wrong about the hierarchy of attachments
A03 - Cultural varations
- Important differences between cultures in terms of the way people relate to each other
- Individualist culture (UK, US) only focus on own needs or family
- Collectivist culture more focused on needs of of group rather than individual, people sharing things like childcare
- therefore multiple attachments common in collectivist culture
- Sagi et al: compared attachments in infants raised in family-based sleeping arrangements /raised in communal environments
- Closeness of attachments with mothers was twice as common in family-based arrangement
- Suggests stage model applies specifically to individualist cultures
What did Shaffer and Emerson say about the role of fathers?
Shaffer and Emerson state that fathers are less likely to be primary attachment figures
What did Lambs report show about fathers?
studies have shown little relationship between father accessibility (amount of time) and infant-father attachment
What factors make it so that men may not be able to form intense attachment with babies?
Biological and social factors
Explain the biological factor that may not allow men to form deep attachments with infants
- not psychologically equipped because they lack oestrogen
- oestrogen underlies caring behaviour so woman more oriented towards interpersonal goals than men
Explain the social factors that may not allow men to form deep attachments with infants
Cultural expectations: sex stereotypes that affect male behaviour. E.g. it is seen as feminine to be sensitive to the needs of others