Development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Brain stem roles/functions?

A

Connects to spinal cord
Carries motor and sensory nerves
Autonomic functions- heartbeat, breathing, sleeping
Highly developed at birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cerebellum roles/functions?

A

Co ordination
Sensorimotor
Balance
One of the last parts of the brain to reach maturity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Thalamus roles/functions?

A

Deep inside brain- one on each hemisphere

Hub of information- receives sensory info from retina and sends signals to visual areas of the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cortex(cerebral cortex) roles/functions?

A
3mm thick, covers rest of the brain
Frontal- thinking 
Motor area- motor movements
Sensory functions- visual (occipital area)
Cortex develops throughout our lives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Role of nature/nurture?

A

Usually partially both
Product of genes
After first cell fertilised the environment has an affect on development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Infection affect on development?

A

If the mother’s has rubella it can cause deafness and brain damage to the unborn child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Smoking affect on development?

A

Makes babies smaller

Nicotine slows brain growth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Voices affect on development?

A

Babies recognise mothers voice immediately after birth

Shows brain is changed before birth due to external stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Piaget’s theory overview?

A

Young children not able to think logically- brains matures slowly
Schemes- framework of what you know about the world
Assimilation- adapting old schemes to fit something new you’ve discovered
Accommodation- making new schemas to fit new experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cognitive stages?(Piaget)

A

Sensorimotor(0-2) focuses on physical co ordination, cerebellum developing, learn object permanence
Preoperational(2-7) mobile and can use language, lacks reasoning
Concrete operational(7-11) perform better on egocentrism and conservation tasks, better reasoning
Formal operational(11+) formal reasoning , abstract understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sensorimotor?

A

Physical sensation, basic physical coordination(grasping), cerebellum developing, learn object permanence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pre operational?

A

Mobile and can use language, lacks reasoning, not consistently logical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Concrete operational?

A

Can conserve and perform better on egocentrism tasks, better reasoning, can talk about physical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Formal operational?

A

Formal reasoning and can understand abstract ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cognitive stages (Piaget) evaluation?

A

W-underestimated young children , other research found they performed better on conservation and egocentrism tasks(Piaget made the tasks seem difficult in the way it was explained)
W-overestimated older children’s abilities(11 year old children couldn’t understand abstract ideas in research)
S-basic idea is correct, children do go through cognitive stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

McGarrigle&Donaldson’s naughty teddy study aims?

A

They wanted to see whether the child’s reaction would be different if there was no deliberate change in the row of counters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Naughty teddy study method?

A

80 children from Edinburgh, 40 nursery school, 40 from primary school. The children were introduced to a naughty teddy that was known to escape and mess up their toys. The children were shown one row of 4 red and one row of 4 white counters. The teddy then jumped out and pushed one row to make it look smaller. They then asked which row had more counters or do they have the same amount?

18
Q

Naughty teddy study results?

A

41% (33/80) gave the correct answer- that each row had the same number of counters if the change was on purpose
68%(54/80) gave the right answer if the change in counters was accidental
Primary children had higher figures than nursery children

19
Q

Naughty teddy study conclusion?

A

This study proved young children were underestimated, many nursery children could conserve, which Piaget said they were unable to do. Primary school children still did better than nursery, proving they do go through cognitive changes with age.

20
Q

McGarrigle&Donaldson’s naughty teddy evaluations?

A

W-primary age children all came from same school, not applicable
S-challenges Piaget’s assumptions
W-a weakness is that a change in counters may not have even been noticed in the accidental condition

21
Q

Hughes policeman doll study aims?

A

Hughes aimed to see if children would perform better on egocentrism tasks if the task made social sense to them

22
Q

Hughes method?

A

Tested 30 children ages 3&1/2 to 5 years old. They introduced the task very carefully, he or she was shown a model with two intersecting walls. They would place the policeman doll in one place and move the boy doll into each section and ask if the policeman could see him. They then told the children to hide the boy from the policeman doll, then they did it with two policeman dolls.

23
Q

Hughes results?

A

Hughes found that 90% of the children could position the boy doll where the two policemen couldn’t see him.
In more complex trials , only 60% were successful

24
Q

Hughes conclusion?

A

This shows that Piaget underestimated young children’s abilities in egocentrism.

25
Q

Hughes evaluation?

A

S-challenges Piaget
W-researched could have subconsciously hinted at the answer
S-realism of the task in comparison to Piaget’s three mountains task

26
Q

Dweck’s theory: dealing with failure

A

Fixed-aren’t as talented, in point in trying

Growth- opportunity for improvement

27
Q

Dweck’s theory: fixed mindset

A

Intelligence fixed in genes
Don’t believe they should have to work for things
Effort has no effect

28
Q

Dweck’s theory: growth mindset

A

Set goals
Believe in improvement
Work pays off
Like a challenge

29
Q

Evaluation of dweck’s theory

A

Real world application

30
Q

Evaluation of learning styles?

A

Show traditional teaching may be too verbaliser based

No supporting evidence

31
Q

Willingham’s theory: self regulation

A

If you can control your actions, you can get better grades

Delayed gratification has good effect

32
Q

Willingham’s theory: praise

A

Should be unexpected

Praise effort

33
Q

Willingham’s theory: neuroscience

A

Particular brain patterns link to dyslexia, they can get help earlier

34
Q

Willingham’s theory: memory and forgetting

A

Practice retrieval

Learn cues

35
Q

Readiness

A

Cognitive ability comes with natural ageing

Child cannot understand something if they aren’t ready

36
Q

Learning and teachers role

A

Children must discover things themselves
Active
Stimulating environments that challenge schemes and provoke questions

37
Q

Effect if self efficacy on motivation?

A

If you believe you are capable, they persist more when they find things difficult

38
Q

Positive effects of praise?

A

Feel good and want to repeat behaviour
Must be honest, sincere and deserved
Increases self esteem

39
Q

Praise effort?

A

Emphasise effort more than performance

You can always change effort

40
Q

Self efficacy?

A

Idea of how capable you are