DETERMINATION OF LEASES Flashcards
What is Forfeiture?
Forfeiture is the early termination of a lease by the Landlord because of some breach of covenant by the Tenant
What are the relevant ways a lease can end?
- Forfeiture
- Peaceful re-entry
- Notice
Where a contract does not stipulate, where does the Lessor’s power to forfeit come from?
s107(d) PLA.
A landlord can forfeit:
1. If the rent is in arrears for one month; or
2. The tenant has been in default of any other covenant for TWO months.
How is Forfeiture achieved?
- First a notice under s124 PLA must be given
2. Then where the tenant fails to remedy the breach, a letter of unequivocal demand for possession: Ex Parte Whelan
What are the requirements of s124 Notice?
It must:
- Specify the breach
- If the breach is capable of remedy, require the lessee to remedy the breach
- Allow reasonable time for the remedy of the breach
- if Compensation is claimed, then the LL must specify the Compensation that T is to pay
Where would a breach not be able to be remedied?
Rugby School v Tannahill
Where the value of the premises has been seriously affected.
This does not mean s24 Notice need not be given, it should still be given, however does not have to require the Tenant to remedy the breach
What is the relevance of Glass v Kencakes?
The subtenant used the premises for prostitution. The tenant did not know the Subtenant’s business activities.
The notice served under act was defective because it did not require the Tenant to remedy the breach. A fresh notice had to be given.
Can the tenant get relief against forfeiture?
Yes, s124(2) allows the tenant to apply for relief, when a s124 notice has been served against them.
What will the courts consider when granting relief to the Tenant against forfeiture?
- All circumstances of the case;
- Conduct of the tenant
- Nature and gravity of breach
- Any capability on the part of the Tenant to rectify consequences of breach
- Whether breach was deliberate.
What is the relevance of Gill v Lewis?
The tenant was in arrears of a substantial amount of rent and had been particularly bad payers of rent.
LL decided to forfeit lease and the notice was served. They go to court to get the lease forfeited.
At court, the tenants show u with money for arrears of rent and they request relief from forfeiture
Courts held: They grant forfeiture on the basis that the LL had recovered all he was entitled to and the breach was cured.
What case where there was no relief against forfeiture?
Stieper v Deviot.
In this case, the Tenant had outstanding costs and arrears of rent.
The tenant in this case had highly flammable liquid stored on premises.
Because of this, the insurance companies refused to ensure premises with those chemicals which had exposed the premises to risk of fire.
Courts held: because of this, there was no relief against forfeiture.
Where the breach is not remedied, what can the Landlord do?
- Give a notice for the unequivocal demand for possession of premises - Ex Parte Whelan or
- Commence proceedings for possession of premises: Moore v Ullcoats
What does unequivocal demand mean?
Ex Parte Wheelan
The LL wanted to forfeit lease by gaining possession. He goes together with solicitor’s clerk and they say they are effecting a re-entry.
The tenant says go away and threatens to call police. They go away, and subsequently go to court.
Held: The courts indicate it is enough that the LL demands possession, there does not need to be actual surrender to be forfeiture.
What is the relevance of Moore v Ullcoats?
This case, LL wanted to forfeit lease by commencing an action for possession.
The LL also brought an action for an injunction to restrain any breaches.
Courts held:
This would have been fine to allow forfeiture, however the second claim for the injunction indicated that there was no unequivocal demand as that claim was based on the fact that the lease would still be enforced.
What is peaceful re-entry?
This is when after the lease has been forfeited, but the tenant remains in possession.
The LL can use force that is “Reasonably necessary” (Macintosh v Lobel) to remove the tenant.