Design Economics & Cost Planning Flashcards

1
Q

What is a good wall to floor ratio?

A

Between 0.4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does it mean for a wall to floor ratio to be 1?

A

That the area of the external wall is equal to the area of the floor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the different sources of cost data?

A

SPONS
BCIS
Tender Returns
Benchmarked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who produces SPONS?

A

Aecom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name a pro and con of spons?

A

Pro - Can access useful cost data quickly (compared to market testing).

Con - Only updated once a year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

You worked on a project in Leeds, what was the location factor?

A

Leeds: 90.
London: 121.
-26% difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

On Confidential Project South Wing, why was you measuring in accordance with NRM 1 at RIBA stage 4?

A

NRM 2 is for Detailed Measurement of Construction Works, such as BoQ. I was producing a cost plan, not a BoQ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is it necessary to apply for inflation?

A

My companies policy is to adjust for inflation on a quarterly basis, however this can be reviewed more closely depending on the item and volatility of the market. For example steel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When market testing, how do you ensure the returns you are getting are an accurate reflection of what the Main Contractor’s would be?

A

1) Use the same subcontractors the Main Contractor would use
2) Give accurate information about project specifities (location / start-on site date)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

You mention on PwC Leeds that you advised on the rearranging of partitions. What impact did this have regarding abutments to mullions?

A

My advice was based on the value improvement that could made through rearranging the layout of the partitions. I proposed this to the design team who considered this impact, and subsequently developed a solution that worked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

You mention on PwC Leeds that you advised on the rearranging of partitions. What impact did this have regarding insurance for touching up the facade?

A

Impact to insurance is outside of my professional expertise and is excluded within my cost plans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

On PwC Manchester, how did you advise your Client about the risk of cost overrun between stages?

A

I held percentages from RIBA Stage 1 - RIBA Stage 3 as there was insufficient information available to produce a risk register.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

On PwC Manchester, why at Stage 4 was it now overbudget? Did you not hold sufficient risk considering the level of design at that time?

A

The project was overbudget at Stage 4 due to the minimal design information produced prior to that. At “RIBA Stage 3” the design team had used floor plans rather than having detailed DWG’s, specifications to market test etc.

The issue wasn’t that I wasn’t holding enough in risk, the issue was that there were large changes from RIBA stage 3 to 4 around the assumptions i made and reviewed with the design team, such as the increase in feature lighting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

On PwC Leeds, you say there was an increased requirement for feature acoustic suspended rafts than what was allowed for at Stage 2. Why not just reduce the quantities back to Stage 2?

A

The issue was not the amount of ceilings, it was that the rates I included at RIBA Stage 2 where standard acoustic rafts, whereas in the RIBA stage 3 design they were more feature acoustic panels, with some of the ceiling finishes being as high as £2,000/m2 when market testing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can you tell what should be considered when adjusting cost data?

A

Project Specifities
Inflation
Location
Abnormals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the formula for adjusting cost data for inflation?

A

(New - Old) / Old

17
Q

What are the four risk allowances as per NRM1?

A

Construction Risk
Employer Change Risk
Employer Other Risk
Design Development Risk

18
Q

What would you expect construction risk to be at Stage 2?

A

It would depend on the nature of the project and the surveys / information available that could impact the Construction stage. For example, ground contamination, ordinance surveys, ground condition surveys.

19
Q

Can you give me 4 elements as per NRM elemental breakdown?

A

Facilitating Works
Substructure
Superstructure
Finishes

20
Q

What are the key cost drivers on a typical project?

A

On a new build:
Services
External Walls
Superstructure

21
Q

Can you walk me through the process of getting cost data from sub contractors?

A

Depending on the confidentiality of the project, I would contact them typically via phone and follow up with an email, identifying what I need assistance with pricing. I would provide as much detail as possible to assist.

22
Q

What would you say is the best method for gathering cost data?

A

It would depend on the projects priorities. For example, market testing is typically the most accurate however can be time consuming obtaining costs from the market.

23
Q

What informed you that the ceiling finishes were too high?

A

I split the costs elementally and compared the costs/m2 against other CAT B PwC fitouts.

24
Q

What was the target rate? Why this number?

A

£350/m2. I found on other PwC office Cat B fit-outs that this rate was more than sufficient to obtain a ceiling finish that met the Client quality and function. In Leeds, some ceiling finishes were as high as £2,000/m2.

25
How did you identify that the electrical installations were a cost driver?
The amount of feature lighting had increased significantly since RIBA stage 3.
26
Why were they not sufficient VE opportunities and how did you assess this?
Due to the minimal scope and nature of the project. It was 700k construction value, and 200k overbudget. The scope was minimal (new partitions, new carpet, new feature lighting), and there were insufficient VE opportunities that wouldn't have compromised on quality / function.
27
Can you explain what value you added on PwC Manchester and to your client through your advice?
The value I added was engaging with all parties at every stage of design, and acting in my Client's best interest. My Client didn't wish to invest heavily in the design, so I actively managed costs when design was limited by meeting and communicating with the architects. Once I found there to be scope creep and the costs exceeded the Client's budgets, I proactively managed this process to get the project within my Clients budget.
28
What is a cost analysis?
Elementally splitting the costs on a £/m2 or £/ft2 basis and comparing this against other projects of a similar nature.
29
What was the rate allowed for the glazed partitions?
£650/m2.
30
What was the cost difference between London and Leeds?
London = 121 Leeds = 90 25% difference.