derivative claims cases Flashcards
foss v harbottle
Wigram VC: ‘prima facie the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character’
two rules: 1) the majority rule 2) the proper plaintiff rule
edward v halliwell
exceptions 1) fraud on the minority 2) ultra vires 3) special majority
wallersteiner v moir
the company could be liable for costs
iesini v westsrip
Lewiston J on s172 ‘essentially a commercial decision which the court is ill-equipped to take expect in a clear case
franbar holdings v patel
application was refused - was possible to bring a s994 action available - court’s discretion
cullen investments
permission was granted - hypothetical director would have questioned the actions of the defendant - show the courts are willing to have a more flexible approach
prudential assurance co
the principle of no reflective loss - if the loss of the member is reflective of the loss of the company, the company comes above the members