Democracy and The RoL Flashcards

1
Q

How is democracy expressed

A

Democracy within the union
Democracy in member states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What article provides founding values of the union

A

TEU article 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TEU article 2

A

Founding values:
Democracy
RoL
Respect for human rights
human dignity
Freedom
Equality

RoL and democracy are the cornerstones of the EU
Also some overlap w fundamental rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Democracy and the EUs legal framework
Which article provides for it

A

The EU is sufficiently democratic
Democracy is the basis of legitimacy of the union
Principle of conferral: Member states give some of their sovereigty to the EU

Article 10 TEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Article 10 TEU

A

Citizens democratically represented through european parliament

Member states democratically represented through the european council and the council is democratically accountable to its member states and thus its citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the EU indirectly democratic?

A

Because the council s composed of heads of each state
Some countries democratically elect their head thus theres some type of democratic representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Composition of European council
Which article gives effect to council

A

Head of member state from each country,ie. taoiseach in ireland

Article 15 TEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Article 15 TEU

A

Council gives the impetus of the EU and the political direction of the Eu but does not execute legislative functions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is the EU sufficiently democratic?
Who comments on this?

A

In the beginning the parliament wasnt even directly elected but then it became representation through election but it still had way less power than the council which are not elected
Varrious treaty reforms have attempted to give parliament equal adoption power to the council

Craig and De Burca p.182

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Craig and de burca p182

A

Noted some issues with democracy in the EU

Resistant to democratic pressure
The council is not democratically elected and citizerns cannot directly vote to change its composition

Rebuttal: in some countries You democratically elect your head of state/can vote for a referendum etc so theres some element of democracy

Executive dominance
The council, not directly elected, still holds a significant more amount of power than the parliament that is

Remoteness from citizens
Citizens cant really change the EU law themselves
And this is also due to
Lakc of transparency and complexity
Difficult for citizeens to comprehend and understand functioning and issues that arise before the EU

Conclusion: EU democratic but democracy ,mostly stems from democracy in member states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Member states and democracy
Which article provides for it

A

Article 49 TEU
in order to join the EU the member state must uphold the values of the Eu under Article 2 TEU.

Note that these values arent just a one off thing, must continuously have respect for them
Issue: EE and RoL crisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What defines the RoL and rules surrounding it
Name recitals and explain

A

RoL Condiditonality regulation 2020
Recital 6: In order to have respect for human rights and remocracy,must have respect for RoL and vice versa

RoL is the hinge of dem and fundamental rights

Recital 3:
Defines RoL
Member states must adhere to the laws and their contraints whilst having respect for democracy and fundamenta rights under the control of independent and impartial courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

RoL Crisis in Poland

A

Prior government had no respect for RoL
New government wanted to rebuild RoL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hungary

A

Constantly under scruitiny for lack of independence of judiciary and human rights violations

Examples
Restricitons on media and freedom of expression
Resritcions on NGOs and universisits
restricitons on LGBTQ rights
LAck of respect /poor treatment of refugees and asylum seekers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Eu deal with these issues

A

Article 7 TEU provides a mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

State Article 7 TEU mechanism

A

Council can find that theres a serious breach of values of EU
Breach mist be considered to be serious and persistent
Can choose to impose sanctions on the treaty rights of the member state,ie voting rights

NEver been used as need 4/5 majority for 1st step

17
Q

Other ways to enforce the RoL

A

Monitoring by the Comission
Restritciton on Eu funding
Legal Proceedings

18
Q

Monitoring by the Comisison

A

COmission looks at values within each memebr state yearly and report on access to courts, RoL and functioning of courts
Aims to stop breaches from the onset

19
Q

Restriction on funding

A

Can restrict funding or lessen it from EU budget
Note: A breach doesnt automatically mean tha funding will be restricted

RoL Regulaion
Eu can restrict funding if the breach of the values restricts the financial management of the Eu

20
Q

Legal proceedings
State 2 routes

A

Witholding funds
Refering the Matter to the CJEu

21
Q

Witholding funds state case

A

Hungary v Council and Parliament

22
Q

Hungary v Council and Parliament

A

Issue: Argument that the treaty already provided mechanisms to deal with breaches of the RoL.

Held: The court did not agree.
The values are not just a one-off requirement to meet: there must be continuous respect for the values.
Vales are so integral to the identity of the EU, shouldn’t be addressed by only a singular mechanism.
It is open to the union to create another mechanism to enforce these values as long as they are different to the Article 7 procedure.

December 2022: The Council decides to withhold around 55% of the EU Structural Funds

December 2023: They felt that there was some improvement so they released 10 billion and 20 billion remained suspended.

23
Q

Reference to CJEU
State cases

A

Comisison v Poland
Comission v Poland - disciplinary procedure for judges

24
Q

Comisison v Poland
State relevant article

A

TEU Article 19(1):
Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.

25
Q

Comission v Poland

A

Facts: Poland lowered the retirement age of judges significantly.
As a result, a lot of sitting judges were removed from court.
The president had the power to selectively allow judges to stay on the court even if they surpassed the retirement age.
This posed as a huge issue in regard to judicial independence.

Argument: The commission argued that this was in breach of Article 19.

Held: The courts interpreted Article 19 teleologically.
P58: The requirement of independence forms part of the fundamental right to a fair trial.
It guarantees the right to effective judicial protection.
These are both guarantees that directly derive from EU law and are consistent with the values under TEU Article 2.
RoL must be safeguarded.

P118: Removing a large number of judges and selectively allowing certain ones to stay raises reasonable doubt as to the neutrality of these judges and their protection from external factors.

26
Q

Comission v Poland - disciplinary procedure for judges

A

Facts: Concerned a measure implementing disciplinary procedures for judges referring cases to the CJEU.

Held: This measure by Poland was a breach of Article 267.
P222: The keystone of the judicial system established by the Treaties is the preliminary ruling procedure provided for in Article267 TFEU.

There must be mutual trust between the national courts and the courts of justice.

It is implicit in the function of the mechanism that judges be allowed to refer matters to the CJEU.

Measures that permitted judges to be subject to disciplinary proceedings because they referred a case to the CJEU were in breach of Article 267.