Definitions of Abnormality Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 4 definitions of abnormality?

A

Statistical infrequency
Deviation from social norms
Failure to function adequately
Deviation from ideal mental health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is statistical infrequency?

A

Statistical infrequency is used to define an occurrence when an individual has a less common characteristic within a given population.
According to this definition any relatively usual behaviour or characteristic can be thought of as ‘normal’, and any behaviour that is different to this is ‘abnormal’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

IQ and intellectual disability disorder example for statistical infrequency?

A

The average IQ is 100. Most people (68%) have an IQ ranging from 85-115. Only 2% of people have an IQ below 70, and therefore may be rendered ‘unusual’ or receive a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a limitation for statistical infrequency?

A

One limitation of statistical infrequency is that characteristics that would be classed as abnormal are actually positive.
According to this definition, individuals with an IQ above 130 would be deemed as abnormal even though having a high IQ is a desirable characteristic.
This means that, although statistical infrequency can form part of assessment and diagnostic procedures, it is never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a strength for statistical infrequency?

A

One strength of statistical infrequency is that it has real-world applications.
Statistical infrequency is used in clinical practice, both as part of formal diagnosis and as a way to assess the severity of an individual’s symptoms. An example is the Beck Depression Inventory, where a score of 30+ indicates severe depression.
This shows that the value of the statistical infrequency criterion is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are social norms?

A

Social norms are the unwritten rules of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours that are considered acceptable in a particular social group or culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is deviation from social norms?

A

Deviation from social norms is used to define occurrences that are different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society.
Groups of people choose to define abnormality based on whether or not it offends their sense of what is the ‘norm’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 4 important things to consider when applying deviation from social norms?

A

Time
Cultural Relativism
Context
Degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Deviation from social norms: time?

A

Social norms change over time.

There are instances where social norms that were acceptable in the past are no longer deemed as acceptable in modern society, such as drunk driving and smoking.

There are also instances where social norms that were previously unacceptable are now considered ‘normal’ in modern society, such as homosexuality and having children out of wedlock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deviation from social norms: cultural relativism?

A

Behaviour only makes sense when viewed within the originating culture.

Abnormality cannot be judged without reference to the standards of culture where the behaviour arose.

A diagnosis of mental illness may be different for the same person in two different cultures.

For example, hearing voices is socially acceptable in some cultures but would be seen as a sign of mental abnormality in the UK (schizophrenia).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an example for cultural relativism?

A

The Kayan people live on the mountain border between Burma and Thailand.
From the age of 5, women wear a brass coil that increases in size as they age. Over the years, this coil presses on the clavicle resulting in the appearance of a long neck, a sign held in great esteem by the tribe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Deviation from social norms: context?

A

The context of the behaviour has to be considered.
For example, wearing a bathing suit on a beach would be considered normal. However, wearing a bathing suit to do your weekly shopping in Tesco would be considered abnormal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Deviation from social norms: degree?

A

An important consideration is the degree to which a social norm is deviated from and how important society sees that norm as being.
For example, being very rude to someone else would be considered deviant. But, how rude does someone have to be before such behaviour is considered pathological?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a strength for deviation of social norms?

A

One strength of deviation from social norms is that it has real-world applications.
Deviation from social norms is used in clinical practice. For example, social norms play a part in the diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder, where the term ‘strange’ is used to characterise the thinking, behaviour and appearance of people with the disorder.
This is a strength as it shows that the deviation from social norms criterion has value in psychiatry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a limitation for deviation from social norms?

A

One limitation of deviation from social norms is that too much reliance on this definition can lead to systematic abuse of human rights.
For example, Drapetomania was a supposed mental illness that, in 1851, physicians thought was the cause of enslaved Africans fleeing captivity. This was centred around the belief that slavery was such an improvement upon the lives of slaves that only those suffering from some form of mental illness would wish to escape.
This is a limitation as historical examples of deviation from social norms such as this show how these mental health diagnoses were really there to maintain control over minority groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does failure to function adequately mean?

A

A person may cross the line between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ at the point when they can no longer cope with the demands of everyday life.
It may be decided that someone is failing to function adequately if they are unable to maintain basic standards of nutrition or hygiene, unable to hold down a job, or maintain personal relationships.

17
Q

When is someone failing to function adequately?

A

David Rosenhan and Martin Seligman (1989) proposed some signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping:
Unpredictability
Maladaptive behaviour
Personal distress
Irrationality
Observer discomfort
Violation of moral standards
Unconventionality

18
Q

What is the most common way to decide if someone is failing to function adequately?

A

Global assessment of functioning scale (GAF).

19
Q

What is the GAF?

A

The GAF is part of the DSM-V and is an assessment tool used by mental health clinicians to rate the social, occupational, and psychological functioning of adults.
There is a GAF scale for adults and a GAF scale for those under 18 years old.

20
Q

What is a strength for failing to function adequately?

A

One strength of failure to function adequately is that it does attempt to include the subjective experience of the individual.
By focusing on the individual and how they are managing in everyday life from their perspective, they will be deemed as abnormal and get the help that they need.
This is a strength as it suggests that failure to function adequately is a useful criterion for assessing abnormality.

21
Q

What is a limitation for failing to function adequately?

A

One limitation of the failure to function adequately is the issue of individual differences.
For example, one person who hears voices may be unable to function adequately; whereas, another person may suffer from the same symptoms but function perfectly well. Therefore, despite the same psychological and behavioural symptoms, each person would be diagnosed differently according to this definition.
This is a limitation as it questions the validity of the failure to function definition.

22
Q

What does deviation from ideal mental health mean?

A

This definition ignores what makes people abnormal. Instead, it focuses on what makes people ‘normal’.
We consider how far people deviate from ideal mental health.
Those who do not possess the characteristics of someone with ideal mental health are considered abnormal.

23
Q

What is Marie Jahoda’s (1958) criteria for ideal mental health?

A

We have no symptoms or distress
We are rational and can perceive ourselves accurately
We self-actualise
We can cope with stress
We have a realistic view of the world
We have good self-esteem and lack guilt
We are independent of other people
We can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure

24
Q

What is a strength for deviation from ideal mental health?

A

A strength is that this definition focuses on what is helpful and desirable for the individual, rather than the other way round.
By focusing on what is desirable, individuals can identify personal goals they need to work towards and achieve normality. For example, one person may aim to be less pessimistic in order to gain more of an accurate perception of reality.
This is a strength because this is the only definition of abnormal behaviour that emphasises a more positive approach to mental problems, allowing individuals to focus on what is desirable, not undesirable.

25
Q

What is a limitation for deviation of ideal mental health?

A

One limitation of this definition is that the mental health criteria is very over-demanding, with extremely high standards.
Very few people attain all of Jahoda’s criteria for mental health. For example, few people experience personal growth all of the time. Therefore, according to this definition, most people are abnormal.
This is a limitation as it suggests that the mental health criteria may be ideals (how you would like to be) rather than actualities (how you actually are), making the standards for ideal mental health far too high and unachievable.