Defences To Murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what act was diminished responsobilities established in

A

coroners and justice act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

stage 1 of DR?

A

the defendent must be suffering from a abnormality of mental functioning which arised from a recognised medical conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did bryne define

A

astate of mind so different from that of an ordinary human being that the reasonable man would term it abnormal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

recognised medical conditions

A

1)battered wives syndrome -hobson
2)epilepsy-campbell
3)chronic depression -seers
4)pre menstural tension-smith
5)drug and alchol dependancy -stewart
6)irresistable impulses-bryne
7)paranoia- martin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

stage 2 of DR

A

the abnormality must be substantially impaire defendants ability to
a)form rational judgments
b)understand the nature of there conduct
c)exercise self control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did the case golds establish

A

that the abnormality has to be weighty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

stage 3 of DR

A

that the abnormality must establish the reason for killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

homocide act 1957

A

the abnormality must be a significant contributory factor in the killing via the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

side rule for stage 3 DR

A

intoxication/drugs -if the defendant was suffering from an abnormality and is intoxicated at the same time the jury must ignore the drinking and consider the abnormality alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what act determined loss of control

A

coronors and justice act (s54)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

stage 1 OF LOSS OF CONTROL

A

defendant must have lost there control
does not need to be sudden but the longer the delay the less likely they are to recieve the defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did the case of gregson determine

A

you must tske into consideration the defendants circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

stage 2 loss of control

A

loss of control must be due to a qualifying trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 stages of qualifying trigger are

A

fear trigger (pearson)-the defendent must have genuine fear for themselves but the violence does not need to be directed at them

anger trigger (hatter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 stages in anger trigger

A

1 things said or done to provoke d
2 amoumting to circumstances of an extreme grave charecter affecting the deffendant
3 defendant must have a justifiable sense of being wronged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

side rule by clinton

A

sexual infedelity must not be the only qualifying trigger there has to be another provoking factor or the defense will be lost

17
Q

stage 3 of loss of control

A

s54(3) would a person with the same age gender with a normal degree of tolerance have acted in the same way

18
Q

side rule of stage 3

A

defence will not be given for the desire of revenge