Declarant Witness Hearsay Exceptions Flashcards

1
Q

Declarant-Witness hearsay exceptions

A
  • past inconsistent statements made under oath at trial/hearing/depostion
  • past consistent statements to rebut fabrication charge or restore credibility
  • statements of ID
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FRE 612

A

adverse party has certain rights to use writing to refresh memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FRE 613 is about ___

A

impeachment (can’t come in for its own truth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under 613(a) when examining witness about a prior statement a party need not __

A

show or disclose to the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under 613(a) a party must upon request ___

A

show contents of prior statement to the adverse party’s attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Difference between 613 and 801(d)(1)

A

613 can only come in to show lied, 801 can come in for truth of prior statement because it was taken under oath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FRE 613(B) says that extrinsic evidence of witness prior inconsistent statement admissible only if ___

A

witness given opp to explain or deny AND adverse party given opp to examine witness about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Woman claims D robbed her of all money, but had taken cab home and paid cabbie (according to what cabbie told cops after).

A
  • Inadmit under 801(d)(1)(A) bc prior statement needs to be in prior proceeding, very limited. Doesn’t include talking to cops.
  • Admit under 613 to show inconsistency. Limiting instruction to show this is coming in for inconsistency, not truth. (Means you can’t say in, e.g., closing that woman paid cabbie → no evid!)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly