Declarant Witness Hearsay Exceptions Flashcards
Declarant-Witness hearsay exceptions
- past inconsistent statements made under oath at trial/hearing/depostion
- past consistent statements to rebut fabrication charge or restore credibility
- statements of ID
FRE 612
adverse party has certain rights to use writing to refresh memory
FRE 613 is about ___
impeachment (can’t come in for its own truth)
Under 613(a) when examining witness about a prior statement a party need not __
show or disclose to the witness
Under 613(a) a party must upon request ___
show contents of prior statement to the adverse party’s attorney
Difference between 613 and 801(d)(1)
613 can only come in to show lied, 801 can come in for truth of prior statement because it was taken under oath
FRE 613(B) says that extrinsic evidence of witness prior inconsistent statement admissible only if ___
witness given opp to explain or deny AND adverse party given opp to examine witness about it
Woman claims D robbed her of all money, but had taken cab home and paid cabbie (according to what cabbie told cops after).
- Inadmit under 801(d)(1)(A) bc prior statement needs to be in prior proceeding, very limited. Doesn’t include talking to cops.
- Admit under 613 to show inconsistency. Limiting instruction to show this is coming in for inconsistency, not truth. (Means you can’t say in, e.g., closing that woman paid cabbie → no evid!)