Character Evidence (2) Flashcards

1
Q

Pertinent in 404(a) means ___

A

about the charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reputation evidence can be rebutted/crossed by prosecutor under 404(a)(2)(a) to ____

A

test credibility through knowledge of reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In Michaelson, cross about whether character witness knew about D’s prior bribery charge was proper to ___

A

weaken assertion law-abiding citizen and undermine credibility of witness who didn’t know

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FRE 405 is about ___

A

methods of proving character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

405(a) says that when evidence of character trait admissible it can be proved by ___

A

testimony about person’s reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

405(a) allows for cross-exam to ___

A

prove allow relevant inquiry into specific relevant instances of the person’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

405(b) says that when a person’s character or trait is an essential element then -__

A

the character or trait may also be proved by relevant specific instances of the person’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

405(b) is very narrow and limited to cases like ___

A

entrapment, parental custody, libel, sexual violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FRE 406 is about ___

A

habit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FRE 406 says that Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove ___

A

on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FRE 406 says that court may admit this evidence irregardless of ___

A

corroboration or eyewitness testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Driver testify in civil case against him that careful driver. Admit?

A

No, bc 404(a)(1) prohibits character evidence (propensity to be careful).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Driver testify always signals before switching lanes. Admit?

A

Yes, habit under 406.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Character witness wants to talk about specifics. Admit?

A

No, under 405(b). Allowable through cross under 405(a).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Character witness talks about reputation for honesty. Can cross with: “Have you heard X was arrested for completing false mortgage app…?”

A

Yes under 405(a). Allowable cross of credibility thru arrests thru Michelson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“I wouldn’t shoot anybody” during direct; then cross with “Have you ever shot at other people before?” → “Do you recall telling us you shot somebody before?

A

Allowed 405(a) cross bc D used herself as character witness by saying “I wouldn’t shoot anybody,” kicking in 404(a).
Pros can rebut pertinent trait per 404(a) and with specific instance 405(a).

17
Q

Defendant themselves can become ____

A

character witness through statement

18
Q

Keiser charged w shooting/paralyzing Romero in self-defense. Romero shouted “Remember his face” to his friends re Keiser’s brother. Admissible for Romero’s violent nature?

A

404(a)(2)(B) allows introducing evidence of victim’s character; reputation evidence under 405(a).
BUT brother can’t say victim/Romero has reputation for violence → not qualified to speak on reputation/opinion based on one incident; so improper.

19
Q

You can’t speak on reputation/opinion based on ___

A

one incident

20
Q

James’s testimony that victim had boasted about killing people and got away with it.

A

404(a)(2)(B) allows victim’s character evidence – no specific details under 405(a).
BUT can argue specific instances allowed under 405(b) bc this is about proving essential element of reasonable fear in D’s mind bc self defense.

21
Q

D claimed acted in self defense against victim whose toxicology report included cocaine, alcohol, morphine which can stimulate violent behavior.

A

Not character evidence! Literally at time of incident, had in system. Can admit.

22
Q

Under 608, evidence of truthful character only admissible when ___

A

truthfulness been attacked (otherwise bolstering)

23
Q

404(b) is about ___

A

other act/propensity evidence

24
Q

Habit is a _____

A

regular response to a repeated specific situation (more narrow than character)

25
Q

FRE 608 is about ___

A

character for truthfulness/untruth

26
Q

Evidence assumes that once a liar ___

A

always a liar

27
Q

608(b) extrinsic evidence means ___

A

evidence outside witness’ personal knowledge