Deception Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of deception

A

An act intended to foster in another, a belief that the deceiver considers false (e.g. if “deceiver” doesn’t consider what they are saying is false, they are not being deceptive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the key to determining what is deceptive or not?

A

Conscious deliberate intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the duel nature of deception?

A

Communication of specific information and meta-communication about the truth value of the content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Deception Cues vs. Leakage Cues

A

Deception Cues: information that gives away the falsehood

Leakage Cues: information that gives away the true information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is cue competition?

A

When verbal and nonverbal signs carry implications that are at odds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is detection apprehension?

A

The fear of being caught at telling a lie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Othello Error?

A

It occurs when a lie catcher fails to consider that a truthful person who is under stress may appear to be lying; truthful people may be afraid of being disbelieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Underlying emotional factors in Deception

A
  • Fear (detection apprehension)
  • Guilt (deception guilt)
  • Excitement (“duping delight”) - some people take pleasure in being deceptive

Most lies fail due to either inadequate preparation or the interference of emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theoretical approaches to deception

A

A) Attempted control - lacks spontaneity and is overly-planned. This is one way deceptive people can come across
B) Arousal - lying causes people to be aroused and change their speech rate & pitch, their pupils dilate, they increase gesture use, change their gaze, etc.
C) Affect - when the stakes are high and a lot can be lost. “Microexpressions” leak out before people knowingly turn them off.
D) Cognitive load - keeping your story straight can be hard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence for humans being poor lie detectors

A

Vrij (2000)

  • reviewed 40 studies. 67% accuracy rate for detecting truths, 44% accuracy for detecting lies.
  • “Truth bias” - we assume people are telling us the truth.

Bond & DePaulo (2006)

  • results from 206 reports and 24,483 judges
  • people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments
  • correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as non deceptive

Bond & DePaulo (2008)

  • 142 studies reviewed with 19,801 judges of deception
  • mean accuracy of 54.05% in discriminating lies from truths

CONCLUSION: People do not do much better than chance at detecting deception, even though people typically report extremely high confidence in their detection ability; this is misplaced confidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How good are the professionals?

A
  • In the study where students had to lie to cops about having a pair of headphones, their accuracy rates were low.
  • 60% accurate AT BEST
  • Cops’ confidence for detection was high
  • Correlation between confidence and actual accuracy was nearly 0
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the “Truth Bias”

A
  • People are especially likely to judge familiar vs. unfamiliar persons as truthful.
  • “My partner has been honest with me in the past, therefore she/he is being truthful now” - the truth bias won’t pick up on cues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Detecting deception in children

A
  • 3-7 yr olds induced to lie with a cool toy
  • They haven’t fully developed their deception skills, but judges could not accurately detect the liars based on nonverbal cues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is anyone good at detecting lies?

A
  • no compelling evidence for this

- someone in the 86th percentile of detection ability is only 1% better than someone in the 16th percentile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why are humans poor lie detectors?

A

Vrij et al. (2010)

  • People lack the motivation to catch liars (ostrich effect)
  • Absence of Pinoccio’s Nose effect - no single cue (nose growing) that indicates someone is lying
  • Countermeasures - people attempt to deliberately conceal their lying qualities in high stakes situations to throw people off
  • Embedded lies - lies embedded with the truth, don’t know how mud is true and how much is a lie. Nonverbals won’t change when you’re partially telling the truth
  • No adequate feedback - no immediate feedback about how well we’re doing at detecting a lie. You may never know if they’re lying or not.
  • A violation of conversational rules
  • There are simply just good liars out there
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common errors in lie detecting

A
  • Examining the wrong cues (using heuristics, or short cuts i.e. liars look away, fidget, or smile) *Liars will actually increase eye contact to try to make people accept their lie.
  • Overemphasis on nonverbal cues - you should focus more on verbal inconsistencies
  • Othello Error
  • Neglect of interpersonal differences - some people just make more eye contact than others; some people are naturally more fidgety
  • Over confidence in lie detection skills - makes you jump to early conclusions and have low levels of vigilance. Better to be skeptical about your skill
17
Q

Cues significantly associated with deception

A
  • Provide fewer details
  • Person makes less sense
  • Internal discrepancies (story starts to slightly change)
  • Repetitions
  • Less verbal/vocal involvement
  • Fewer illustrators
  • Less verb immediacy
  • Pupil dilation
  • Increased vocal pitch (from stress) and very difficult to control so it’s usually a pretty good indicator
18
Q

Cues NOT associated with deception

A
  • Response duration
  • Eye contact
  • Speech disturbances (stutter start and filled pauses)
  • Smiling
  • Silent pauses
  • Head nods
  • Response latency
  • Shrugs
  • Shifting posture
  • Speech rate
  • Foot and leg movements
  • Self fidgeting
19
Q

Detecting deceptive communication

A
  • Nurses watched videos and some instructed to tell truth about video, other instructed to tell lie about it
  • Liars used fewer illustrators, hand movements, more ah-speech disturbances, and longer response latencies than the truth tellers
  • Using these 4 NV behaviors, 71% of truth tellers and 85% of liars were correctly classified.
20
Q

Microexpressions

A

PAY ATTENTION TO THEM!

  • It is a momentary expression of facial emotion
  • Squelched almost immediately
  • Insight into underlying emotional state