Deception Flashcards
Property
Section 2, CA 1961
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right or interest.
Obtain
Section 217, CA 1961
Obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.
Hayes v R
A pecuniary advantage is “anything that enhances the accused’s financial position. It is that enhancement that constitutes the element of advantage.
An unsuccessful use of a document is a much use as a successful one.
Dishonestly
Section 217, CA 1961
In relation to an act or omission, means done or omitted without a belief that there was expressed or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to give such consent or authority.
Claim of Right
A belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in the property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
R v Misic (document)
EIR
Essentially a document is a thing which provides evidence or information or serves as a record.
What is required to be proved
IRRKR
An intent to deceive
A representation by the Defendant
Representation was false;
Knew it to be false in a material particular OR
Reckless whether it was false in a material particular
R v Morley
- An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practiced in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception.
- Representation must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement of future intention.
Cameron v R
Recklessness is established if:
Real possibility
Proscribed result
Circumstances existed
Having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.
Continuing effect
In many cases a representation by words or conduct may have a continuing effect.
Eg. entering a restaurant and ordering dinner represents that the diner will follow the normal practice and pay for the meal. If during the course of dinner the diner decides to avoid payment, the continuing representation will become false, and the obtaining of food will come within s240.
Nature of belief required
- A belief in a proprietary or possessory right in property.
- A belief that the Defendant had proprietary or possessory right.
- belief must be held at the time of the conduct alleged to constitute the offence.
- Belief must be held by the Defendant.
Knowledge can be established by
PIA
- Admission
- Implication from circumstances surrounding the event.
- Propensity evidence.
Device, trick, or stratagem:
Device: A plan, scheme or trick
Trick: An action or scheme undertaken to fool, outwit, or deceive.
Stratagem: A cunning plan or scheme especially for deceiving an enemy, or trickery.
Distinction between theft and obtaining by deception:
- Obtained without the owners permission.
- Title is not passed on.
Special interest
It is sufficient if the person from whom the goods were obtained had some special property or interest in the goods without having actual ownership of them.
Special interest lien:
The Defendant was the owner of a motor car being repaired by a garage. The garage proprietor placed a ‘lien’ over the vehicle until payment of the debt was made.
The effect of this was to permit him to retain possession of the car and gave him a ‘special property or interest in the vehicle.
Debt
Money owing from one person to another.
Liability
A legally enforceable financial obligation to pay, such as the cost of a meal.
Credit
Refers to the obligation on the debtor to pay or repay, and the time given for them to do so by the creditor.
Fisher v Raven
‘Credit’ refers to the obligation on the debtor to pay or repay, and the time given for them to do so by the creditor. Credit does not extend to an obligation to supply services or goods.
Legally enforceable:
The obligation to pay must be legally enforceable against whomever the credit is obtained (usually the Defendant)
Continuing representations:
‘Adam’s in Criminal Law’ said that in many cases a representation, whether by words or conduct, may be of continuing effect. This, entry into a restaurant and ordering a meal would usually be a representation that one will follow the normal practice and pay for the meal at the appropriate time. If, during the course of the meal, a diner decides to avoid payment, the continuing representation of an intention to pay will become false and any subsequent result braiding of food will come within s240
Hire purchase
Where goods are obtained on hire purchase by a false representation, the offence committed is deception.
Proof of the inducement
- That the false representation was believed, and
- That it was the consequence of that belief that the victim parted with his or her money.
Prosecution may offer propensity evidence:
SCAN-FC
When assessing the probative value of propensity evidence, the Judge may consider, among other matters, the following:
1. Frequency
2. Connection in time between the acts.
3. Extent of similarity between the acts.
4. Number of persons making allegations.
5. Whether the allegations may be the result of collusion or suggestibility.
6. Extent of which the acts, omissions, events, or circumstances constitute the offence for which the Defendant is being tried are unusual.
Voidable title
DFDM
A title obtained by deception, fraud, duress or misrepresentation is called a ‘voidable title’. This means that the title can be voided by the seller.
Until the title is voided, the defrauded has voidable title, and can confer good title on anyone who acquires the goods from him or her in good faith and for value.
Example: Hire purchase
Where goods are purchased on hire purchase, title is not obtained until the full amount is paid (ie. title remains with the complainant/owner)
Two core elements of proof required:
- Received property on terms or in circumstances which, to the Defendants knowledge, affect what the Defendant may do with the property or its proceeds or require the Defendant to act in accordance with the requirements of another person, and
- That the Defendant intentionally departed from the relevant obligation.