Debates in Psychology and section B Flashcards
What is the definition of the free will debate
Some argue that human beings are entirely free to act as they choose and bear repsonsibility for the outcome of their behavior
What are the strengths of free will
Exercising free will can allow us to take advantage of situational factors and make changes to our environment to improve behavior which is much more ethical than changing someones biology
Addressing free will is less socially sensitive as it empowers individuals to take control of their own actions to improve behavior
What are the weaknesses of free will
Addressing free will can remove compassion for people who make the wrong choices as they have the ability to make good decisions as their behavior is their responsibility
People feel under pressure to change something about their lives or their behavior which may cause distress and harm if they are unable to
What is the determinism debate
Suggest that we lack control of our behavior and that it is predetermined by factors such as our genes and past experiences
What are the strengths of the determinism debate
Allows us to predict behavior based on predetermined factors increasing predictive validity meaning we can intervene to target this factor
Determinism allows us to establish a root cause that predetermine behavior as such increasing the scientific nature of behavior of deterministic explanations
What are the weaknesses of the determinism debate
Can be socially sensitive as it stigmatizes those with certain pre determined factors that are out of their control
Often deterministic explanations are reductionist as they focus on one predetermining factor
Suggest that humans are more like machines being controlled by factors they have no control over making people feel powerless
What does useful mean
Research that enhances our knowledge and understanding and can be applied to real world situations
What are the strengths of usefulness
Always a strength in relation to the enhancement of knowledge and the ability to apply findings of research to improve human behavior with practical applications
What is limited usefulness
Research that may lack credibility, generalizability or be difficult to apply outside of a research setting
What is the nature debate
Sees biological factors as the explanation for thinking and behavior such as genetics nervous system and brain chemistry
What are the strengths of the nature debate
A nature approach is more scientific as it is easier to understand a root biological cause of behavior which can be measure in an objective way with empirical evidence
Nature explanations are high in predictive validity as we can predict how people will behave depending on their biological factors meaning we can intervene if we predict negative behavior that may occur
What are the weaknesses of the nature debate
Nature explanations are highly deterministic as it assumes that an individual has no control over their behavior as its predetermined by biological factors
These explanations are therefore socially sensitive as they suggest people cannot be held accountable for their actions thus removing from the individual when displaying negative behavior which is due to their nature
What does the nurture debate state
Sees behavior as learned or acquired through experiences in the environment
What are the strengths of the nurture debate
Much more ethical and practical to modify someones environment and learnt behavior so more effective practical applications
Allow us to take control of our own actions so give individualds free will to change their behavior for the better
What are the weaknesses of the nurture debate
May stigmatise those individuals who have had faulty nurturing or role models and who may have learnt poor behavior within their environment
Often these explanations focus only on learnt behavior as therefore ignore individual explanations thus lowering the construct validity as not all aspects of behavior are explored
What does the reductionism debate state
Attempts to break down behavior into its constituent parts and using single factors such as individual genes or paticular hormones to account for a given behavior
What are the strengths of the reductionism debate
Reductionism is more scientific as it allows us to more easily establish a root cause of behavior when focusing on single factors alone
Reductionism also allows for more focused and effective practical applications when focusing on single factora