Debates Flashcards
3x strengths of reductionism
- psychological research is more scientific as it allows the researchers to test the impact on behaviour of one factor at a time
- highly controlled, therefore possible to draw more accurate conclusions
- highly controlled, more replicable (good as it enables us to establish a consistent effect)
2x weaknesses of reductionism
- human behaviour often too complex to be reduced down to one explanation
- focusing on one variable means others may be left out
- highly controlled, therefore can lack ecological validity
2x strengths of holism
- more complex understanding of behaviours
- research not limited to a single area or perspective within psychology so can consider different explanations for the behaviour being investigated
2x weaknesses of holism
- can be difficult to pin down the factor that is having the biggest effect
- holistic explanations can only be verified by separating the different elements within them and testing them one by one to confirm that the factors they claim play a part actually do so; holism can then collapse back into reductionism
Reductionist studies
Freud - explained Little Hans’ phobias and fantasies in relation to his theory of psychosexual development only
Holistic studies
Piliavin et al. - draws on a range of different approaches to explain the helping behaviour of the Subway users; physiological and cognitive reasons
3x strengths of ethical considerations
- participants treated with respect
- enhances the reputation of psychology as an academic discipline
- makes it easier for researchers to obtain participants for future studies if they know the previous ones were treated well
2x weaknesses of ethical considerations
- can place limits on research - e.g. cannot use deception to increase the validity, cannot subject participants to harm for psychological purposes, must reveal true aim of study (unhelpful in situations such as Milgram’s study) by gaining informed consent
- can reduce the validity of a study if they know the aim - may lead them to behave differently to how they might have done if they were deceived
Studies that were conducted ethically
Sperry - participants consented to be studied, were not deceived, harmed or unduly stressed by the experimental tests
Studies that were conducted unethically
Milgram - participants did not give informed consent, were deceived as to the true aim of the study and deceived as they thought they were really shocking someone, put under enormous stress (14 displayed ‘definite signs of nervous laughter’ and 3 had ‘full-blown, uncontrollable seizures’, and were told in 4 different ways (prods) that they could not withdraw
2x strengths of nature
- useful - be it only pointing towards genetic modification of biological interventions
- not ethnocentric - biological factors affect people anywhere
3x weaknesses of nature
- limited usefulness - may not be possible to change a person’s nature
- reductionist - can mean missing out on the impact of nurture
- socially sensitive - identifying a problem about someone that they cannot change
1x strength of nurture
- can be useful - e.g. in education or in changing the way a child is brought up
3x weaknesses of nurture
- reductionist - can mean missing out on the impact of nature
- could be ethnocentric as nurture varies across cultures
- socially sensitive - leading children to blame their parents for the way they were brought up
Studies relating to nature
Kohlberg - theory of moral development suggested that any individual is within a set of predetermined, innate stages, which, no matter what environment the child was brought up in, will remain invariant