Debates Flashcards
What is the formal approach to family definition
´ A formalistic definition would depend on the fulfilment of certain formalities to legally establish a family.
´ This approach is linked to the need for certainty in law.
´ It would provide a criteria that can be established as being met through proof.
´ It would be based on an objective criteria.
´ This could include whether a couple is married or in a civil partnership, whether they have children.
´ It would not be focused on the nuances of intimacy or commitment.
´ It could be easily administered by the courts, so it would be simple, clear, and cheap.
What are the issues with a formal approach to defining a family
´ It can be too technical, and thus include those it should not and exclude those that arguably be included.
´ For instance, if the criteria is as simple as marriage or civil partnership then it would exclude a couple who have been cohabiting for decades, or include a couple who are still married but have been separated for decades.
´ Results can be arbitrary and even unjust.
What is the functional approach to a family definition
´ Focus on the social function of families.
´ The formal nature of the relationship does not matter.
´ ‘What they do, rather than what they are.’
´ For instance, a person caring for a child will have a parental and familial role regardless of formal status.
´ David Morgan: it is difficult to define what a family is, but familial practices can be defined.
What are the issues to the functional approach to family definition
´ What then are the key functions?
´ Care is becoming a more prevalent aspect within many family law debates.
´ When something is defined as a key function does this give it a higher value?
´ How do we decide what combination of factors or number of factors will be required? Who is best to decide this?
What is the normal definition of family approach
´ As understood by the ordinary person.
´ Family is a social construct and thus should be socially defined.
´ It is circular and does not depend on objectivity.
´ Will be impacted by social change, and will vary widely based on social groups.
´ Would allow the law to develop in accordance with society.
What are the issues with the normal meaning of family
more sociological, borderline cases will be hard to definitively determine
What is the self definition of family approach
´ A society gradually accepts more variation in family types, then society may be able to accept those who say they are a family as a family.
´ It does not stigmatise people as not being a family if they wish to be considered as a family.
´ It rejects the idea of an ideal family.
Issues with self def on family approach
´ While a good social approach, it is difficult to use in law.
´ Such an approach could not be used in a meaningful way in law, as it would be difficult to attach significance, rights etc. to such a definition.
´ Incompatible with the notion that some family structures are better (as to the security, welfare and care they provide).
What is the concept of care centred family law
´ Traditional family has been defined by sexual relations and contract.
´ This would represent a move towards a ‘sexless’ family law.
´ The focus becomes care and interdependency.
´ Like a functional approach, but the focus is on one function.
Issues with care centred family definition
´ Traditional family has been defined by sexual relations and contract.
´ This would represent a move towards a ‘sexless’ family law.
´ The focus becomes care and interdependency.
´ Like a functional approach, but the focus is on one function.
What is the idea of having no definition of family
´ There is no real agreement, so a legal definition cannot be provided.
´ The law can rely on other concepts and not define family.
´ It can operate without a definition, but that is not desirable.
´ In order to pursue legal aims in relation to the family a definition of family is really needed.
´ Trying to find a perfect definition is likely to be doomed to failure.
Name the approaches to defining family
Functional/normal/self definition/ care centred/no definition
How do the courts approach morality in family law
Previously very willing to make moral judgments. Used to declare best way to raise child/those at fault for breakdown etc. Now less keen to do this, especially due to no fault divorce
How do the courts consider conduct when it comes to granting financial orders
´ Bad conduct would frequently lead to a reduction in the financial order made, and a very good conduct could increase the award.
´ However, conduct became less relevant and was then only considered when it is obvious and gross or when it would be inequitable to disregard it.
´ Therefore, financial orders will now only consider conduct in the most serious cases.
Why are we moving away from morality
´ Society no longer has one shared set of moral values. A diverse society, with various values and nuanced approaches to the same values cannot then result in a uniform law of morals.
´ Otherwise, it would risk favouring the moral values of a certain group.
´ It would also conflict with wider acceptance of self-determinism as to how people lead their lives.
What does Andrew Bainham say about society and values
´ Andrew Bainham uses the example of adultery and the common practice of infidelity, and thus argues that it cannot be concluded as morally wrong within society while people often assert that is morally wrong.
´ There is often an inconsistency between what people say and do. Which then should determine a society’s values?
What does Alison Diduck say regarding individualisation
´ Alison Diduck: individual autonomy is becoming more recognised within law. Both the importance of the family and the individual family members is being asserted within law.
