Death and the Afterlife Flashcards

1
Q

Are heaven, hell, and purgatory physical places, non-physical states, or symbolic ideas?

A

Some believe heaven, hell and purgatory are physical places where resurrected bodies exist.
Others think they are non-physical states of the soul, reflecting spiritual conditions rather than locations.
A third view is that they are merely symbolic, serving as metaphors for moral and spiritual truths about life on earth, rather than referring to actual post-mortem realities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are heaven and hell eternal?

A

Heaven and Hell are traditionally considered eternal destinations. This view is supported by the story of the Rich man and Lazarus, where a permanent chasm separates the two, indicating that once a soul is judged, its fate is fixed forever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Does Heaven exist now, or is it something that only comes into being at the of time?

A

Some theological interpretations argue that heaven is the future transformation of creation into a perfect form, often called the New Earth, which happens at the end of time. However, the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus suggests that heaven already exists, as Lazarus is shown to be in heaven while the rich man’s family is still alive, indicating that Heaven is not just a future reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does God’s judgement happen- immediately after death or at the end of time?

A

The story of the Rich Man and Lazarus suggests that judgement occurs immediately after death. Both the rich man and Lazarus are judged and are sent to their respective afterlife destinations while the rich man’s family remains on earth. This implies that divine judgment doesn’t necessarily wait until the final resurrection or end of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does everyone pass through
Purgatory?

A

The parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus indicates that not everyone does. Both individuals go directly to their eternal destinations, with no mention of an intermediate purification process. This raises the possibility that Purgatory may not be a universal experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who goes to heaven? How does the concept of election influence this?

A

There are several theological views. Limited election holds that only some Christians are chosen for Heaven. Unlimited election proposes that all morally good people, regardless of faith, may be saved. Universalism suggests that ultimately, everyone will be saved, The Rich Man and Lazarus story appears to support unlimited election, as the rich man is condemned not for disbelief but for failing to act morally, while Lazarus is rewarded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What theological ideas are expressed through the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus?

A

The story portrays Heaven and Hell as real, tangible places, using images of water, a chasm, and physical discomfort. It suggests that people are judged immediately after death and that their destinies are eternal and irreversible. It also implies a moral standard where failing to help others leads to damnation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Martin Luther interpret the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus?

A

Martin Luther argues that the story is a parable, not a literal account. He believes it’s meant to teach a moral lesson rather than describe actual events. He points out inconsistencies, such as the rich man speaking and feeling thirst, which would require a body- yet the resurrection of the body doesn’t happen until the end of time. Therefore, Luther sees the narrative as metaphorical rather than doctrinal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the counterarguments to Luther’s interpretation of the Rich Man and Lazarus?

A

St Jerome challenges Luther’s view by noting that this parable uniquely uses a specific name- Lazarus- whereas other parables only refer to anonymous figures. This could suggest that the story is meant to be taken literally. Furthermore, the seemingly physical details could be metaphorical elements within a real story, not indicators that the entire account is fictional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Even if the story is a parable, does it still support the idea of unlimited election?

A

Possibly. Even if the story is not literal, its moral message implies that people go to Hell for failing to act morally and compassionately. This supports the idea that moral goodness, rather than mere religious identity, is a key factor in salvation- pointing towards unlimited election, at least in its ethical implications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the central belief of New Earth Theology?

A

New Earth Theology teaches that at the end of time, God will transform creation back into its perfect Eden-like state. heaven, in this view, is not a separate realm that currently exists, but a future transformed version of Earth, where resurrected bodies of the righteous will live eternally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does N.T. Wright support the idea of the New Earth?

A

N.T. Wright supports new Earth Theology by referencing the Lord’s Prayer, which says “Thy kingdom come.” He argues this shows that Christians are meant to pray for God’s kingdom to come to Earth, not for believers to leave Earth and go to heaven. This interpretation implies that God’s kingdom will expand to earth at the end of time, restoring creation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What scriptural support is there for the New earth Theology?

A

revelation chapter 21 describes a vison shown to John in which there is a “new heaven and new earth” where suffering no longer exists. This supports the idea that heaven will be a renewed physical creation, rather than an entirely spiritual realm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to New Earth Theology, when does judgment take place?

A

In this view, judgment happens at the end of time. Since heaven (as the New Earth) is not yet created, no one can enter it until that final moment. This contrasts with beliefs that souls are judged immediately after death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a common counterargument to New Earth Theology based on Jesus and the thief on the cross?

A

Critics point to the moment when Jesus tells the thief, “Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” This appears to suggest that Heaven already exists and is accessible immediately after death, contradicting the idea that Heaven is a future event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does New Earth Theology respond to the thief-on-the-cross objection?

A

The response highlights that the original Greek manuscripts of the Bible did not contain punctuation. If the verse is read with the comma placed differently — “Assuredly I say to you today, you will be with me in paradise” — it changes the meaning to a promise of future salvation, not immediate entry into Heaven. This interpretation preserves the possibility of a future New Earth and general judgment at the end of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the overall evaluation of New Earth Theology based on biblical evidence?

A

While there is some scriptural ambiguity, the cumulative evidence from the Lord’s Prayer, Revelation 21, and reinterpretations of key verses like Jesus’ words to the thief support the idea that Heaven is a future, physical reality. The alternative view that Heaven exists now is not definitively proven and may rest on translation and punctuation choices, making New Earth Theology a strong and biblically grounded theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does the physical view say about Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory?

A

The physical view holds that Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory are real, physical places. This is supported by biblical imagery — such as the parable of the sheep and the goats, which describes Hell as “eternal fire” and “eternal punishment,” with people physically gathered before Jesus and separated left and right. These descriptions suggest a physical, resurrected existence in the afterlife.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does the Bible support the physical view of the afterlife?

A

The Bible, especially the writings of St Paul, strongly supports the idea of physical resurrection. Paul describes Jesus’ resurrection as the “first fruits,” indicating it is the first of many and a promise of our future bodily resurrection. Jesus’ tomb was found empty, suggesting his physical body was used in the resurrection, reinforcing the belief in a bodily, physical afterlife.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the spiritual view of the afterlife?

A

The spiritual view argues that Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory are not physical places but states where the soul exists after death. This view focuses on the idea that humans are primarily spiritual beings. It also accounts for what happens immediately after death — since the physical resurrection happens at the end of time, this view suggests our souls are judged and then dwell in a spiritual state until the final resurrection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What biblical support is there for the spiritual view of the afterlife?

A

St Paul, in Philippians 1:21–24, expresses a desire to “depart and be with Christ,” implying that immediately after death, his soul would be in Christ’s presence. This supports the idea of a spiritual afterlife before physical resurrection. Philosophers like Descartes also influenced this view, arguing that the soul is the essential part of human identity, not the body.

22
Q

How does N. T. Wright offer a balanced evaluation between the physical and spiritual views?

A

N. T. Wright presents a view that combines both perspectives. He believes that the ultimate afterlife is physical — with resurrected bodies living in a new Heaven or Earth — but he also accepts that immediately after death, souls exist in a spiritual state. According to Wright, there is an initial judgment after death, and the soul may go to a temporary spiritual state such as Sheol or Hades. Then, at the end of time, the soul is reunited with the body and faces final judgment, entering either a physical Heaven or a physical Hell.

23
Q

According to N. T. Wright, how does judgment work in relation to physical and spiritual existence?

A

Wright teaches that judgment happens in two stages. First, immediately after death, the soul is judged and enters a temporary spiritual state of reward or punishment. Then, at the end of time, there is a final, physical resurrection and judgment, after which people enter a renewed physical Heaven or a physical Hell. This dual-phase model respects both biblical references to immediate post-death presence with Christ and the physical resurrection at the end of time.

24
Q

What is the Catholic understanding of Purgatory?

A

Purgatory, according to Catholic belief, is a temporary state that the soul enters after death if it dies in a state of venial (lesser) sin. It is not a physical place, nor merely symbolic, but a non-physical condition in which the soul is purified before it can enter Heaven. Mortal sins like murder or adultery, if unconfessed, lead to Hell, but venial sins require cleansing — hence, purgatory exists to “purge” the soul before resurrection and entry into eternal life.

25
What is the moral argument in favour of Purgatory?
The moral justification for purgatory is that it would be unjust for someone to be condemned to Hell for relatively minor sins, but it would also be improper for them to enter Heaven while still in a state of sin. Purgatory provides a fair solution by allowing a temporary period of purification for such souls. It maintains the integrity of Heaven while upholding moral justice.
26
Why do Protestants reject the doctrine of Purgatory?
Protestants typically reject purgatory because it is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible. Key biblical texts, like the parable of the sheep and the goats, depict final judgment as binary — souls go either to Heaven or to Hell, with no mention of a third, intermediate state. This absence suggests, for many Protestants, that purgatory is unbiblical and unnecessary.
27
How did Martin Luther criticise the concept of Purgatory?
Martin Luther strongly opposed the idea of purgatory, claiming it was invented by the Catholic Church as a money-making scheme. He criticised the Church’s practice of accepting money in exchange for prayers to reduce a soul’s time in purgatory, calling it corruption. He famously described purgatory as “fabricated by goblins,” and rejected it as a false doctrine.
28
Is there any biblical support for the idea of Purgatory?
One possible biblical reference to purgatory is found in 2 Maccabees, where prayers are offered for the dead. This suggests that the souls prayed for are not in Heaven or Hell — where prayers would have no effect — but in some intermediate state. However, Protestants often reject this book as apocryphal, and Martin Luther considered it “straw,” attempting to remove it from the Bible entirely. As a result, the biblical basis for purgatory remains contested.
29
What is the overall evaluation of Purgatory as a doctrine?
While the concept of purgatory was historically misused by the Church and lacks explicit biblical backing, it still holds ethical appeal. It provides a logical and compassionate explanation for what happens to souls with lesser sins. Catholics argue that it is necessary to preserve both divine justice and the sanctity of Heaven. Even if its scriptural foundations are debated, purgatory continues to offer a morally coherent view of the afterlife.
30
What did liberal theologians like Schleiermacher argue about the Bible during the Enlightenment?
That the Bible is a product of the human mind, not the word of God.
31
How do modern liberals interpret heaven, hell, and purgatory?
As symbolic metaphors for human psychological states during life.
32
What does ‘heaven’ symbolize in the liberal view?
A better life experienced by those who do good to others.
33
What does ‘hell’ symbolize in the liberal view?
A worse life experienced by those who are evil to others.
34
What does ‘purgatory’ symbolize in the liberal view?
The human need to feel guilt and make amends for wrongdoing.
35
How does Tillich understand heaven and hell?
As symbols representing “ultimate meaning” and “unconditional significance” in human experience of the divine.
36
What is a main traditionalist criticism of the symbolic view?
That it leads to subjective interpretation and undermines biblical authority.
37
What is a key defence of the symbolic view?
Denominations already disagree; acknowledging human authorship makes symbolic interpretation rational.
38
What is Augustine’s doctrine of limited election?
Only those predestined by God’s grace before birth can be saved.
39
Why did Augustine think we need grace to be saved?
Original sin makes us incapable of doing good or having faith on our own.
40
What biblical evidence does Augustine use to support predestination?
Romans 8, where Paul says God “predestined” those he “foreknew”.
41
What is Pelagius’ main objection to Augustine’s view?
It is unjust for God to punish people for original sin they didn’t commit.
42
How does Pelagius argue against predestination and for moral responsibility?
Sin must involve free will; predestination removes moral responsibility and makes God unjust.
43
What is unlimited election?
The idea that all morally good people, regardless of religion, can go to heaven.
44
How does the parable of the sheep and goats support unlimited election?
It rewards people based on good actions, not faith or religious identity.
45
How does Catholic inclusivism support unlimited election?
By suggesting non-Christians can be saved through conscience and natural revelation.
46
What is Hick’s main critique of unlimited election?
It still allows for eternal punishment, which is unjust for finite beings.
47
What is universalism?
The belief that all people will ultimately be saved and go to heaven.
47
What biblical support is there for universalism?
1 Timothy 2:4 – God wills the salvation of all people.
48
How does Hick respond to the problem of evil people like Hitler in universalism?
Through purgatory as soul-making: bad people must reform before reaching heaven.
49
Why does Hick believe in physical purgatory and heaven?
Because human identity is psycho-physical, needing bodily resurrection in another world.
50
What ethical argument does Hick use against eternal hell?
Finite beings cannot deserve infinite punishment – it's unjust.
51
How does Hick defend universalism against critics who say it ignores punishment?
His version includes purgatory as a rehabilitative punishment that aligns with God’s love.