DDIUDUDUUOSADU Flashcards
Why might younger children experience less functional fixedness than adults
They have not become accustomed to using familiar objects in a fixed way (they have less knowledge therefore can find different uses/points of views)
What does the validity of a syllogism depend on
2 premises/statements and a conclusion, makes it valid always but not always true
Why might people engage in risky decisions?
When dealing with loss/emphasis on loss
Or when risk reward is emphasized
(gambling)
How do we measure intelligence?
iq tests
Why might these measures be problematic?
standardized and it doesn’t cover the varying types of intelligence and is limited to general intelligence
How does creativity relate to problem solving?
Creative individuals have the ability to generate remote (uncommon) solutions
4 types of problems
- well defined problem
- ill defined problem
- insight problem
- non insight problem
traits of a well defined problem
-only one way to solve + one correct answer
(math problems)
traits of a ill defined problem
-more than one solution + unsteady path
(relationship problems)
traits of a insight problem
look at problem at a different angle to solve
(AHA - answer appears suddenly)
traits of a non insight problem
-use knowledge + logical deduction
Barriers to problem solving (2)
- functional fixedness
2.einstellung effect
functional fixedness
Inability to see beyond the designed or most common use of a particular object (cannot think outside of the box)
einstellung effect
mental set + person’s predisposition to solve a given problem in a specific manner even if better problem solving methods exsist
inductive reasoning
relies on patterns and trends (observations that lead to conclusions) observation may be correct but conclusion is often wrong NOT ALWAYS CORRECT
deductive reasoning
relies on facts and rules (take 2 statements/premises to form a conclusion) ALWAYS CORRECT
deductive reasoning (syllogisms)
Deductive reasoning draws logically sound (valid) conclusions from premises
- includes 2 assumptions (premises) followed by a third statement (conclusion)
validity in syllogisms
Valid ≠ True
If the conclusion follows logically from the two premises of a syllogism, then the syllogism must be valid
(in other words, the validity of a syllogism depends on its form)
deductive reasoning (syllogisms) 2 types
1.conditional syllogisms
2. categorical syllogisms
conditional syllogisms
occurrence of an event may be conditional on the occurrence of another
- “If X, then Y” statements
categorical syllogisms
3 categorical propositions (two premises and a conclusion)
- Usually, premises specify a relationship between two categories
syllogism errors
- confirmation bias
- belief bias
confirmation bias
the tendency to seek confirmatory evidence for a hypothesis
belief bias
valid syllogisms are rejected more often when the conclusion unbelievable
invalid syllogisms are accepted more often when the conclusion is believable
FRAMING EFFECT
cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations (e.g., a loss or a gain)
heuristics
mental shortcuts to facilitate problem solving and judgements
2 types of heuristics
- Representativeness Heuristic
- availability heuristics
Representativeness Heuristic
basing the estimated probability of an event based on how similar it is to the typical prototype of the event
(suit + tie + briefcase = they must be rich/a lawyer)