Day 3 Part 2 Conflict Mgmt Flashcards

1
Q

What is the USAF definition of a military negotiation?

A

An ongoing, deliberative process between multiple parties that uses communication, critical/creative thinking, and trust-building to create cooperative and mutually beneficial options.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is distributive negotiation?

A

A negotiation style assuming limited resources; it’s zero-sum, meaning one party’s gain is another’s loss, often leading to conflict and mistrust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is integrative negotiation?

A

A negotiation style focused on cooperation and mutual benefit, where resources aren’t seen as fixed and solutions can protect relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are AFNC’s Five Problem Solving Approaches

A

Insist
Cooperate
Comply
Evade
Settle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does TIPO stand for in military negotiation planning?

A

Trust, Information, Power, and Options.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two types of trust in TIPO?

A

Personal Trust (between individuals) and Process Trust (in rules, institutions, or procedures).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does trust impact information sharing in negotiation?

A

Higher trust increases openness and use of shared information; low trust limits problem-solving due to skepticism of accuracy or intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the difference between “Power Over” and “Power With”?

A

1) Define the problem, and 2) Identify resources (info, power, people, time, etc.) that can help solve it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens when option building is one-sided?

A

Trust is not developed, information flow is stagnant, and power may be used to force a solution, risking reduced trust and unsatisfactory long-term results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What should be considered when selecting a problem-solving approach?

A

The importance of the task and the relationship with the people involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does a high task orientation indicate?

A

Strong motivation to complete the task or resolve the problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does a low task orientation indicate?

A

The task is not important, or there’s no desire to resolve the situation currently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Evade approach?

A

A passive, unassertive method used when the task or relationship isn’t important or more information is needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is the Evade approach appropriate?

A

When the task is low-priority, there’s no need to build trust or relationships, or more information is needed before acting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the bumper sticker for the Evade approach?

A

“Not now, can you come back later?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Comply approach?

A

Letting the opposite party resolve the issue their way, often to build or maintain trust and relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When is the Comply approach appropriate?

A

When the task is less important than the relationship, trust exists or is desired, and you’re willing to accept their solution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the bumper sticker for the Comply approach?

A

“Yes, absolutely, let’s do it your way!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the Insist approach?

A

A method focused on achieving your objective regardless of relationship cost, often using power and limited trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When is the Insist approach appropriate?

A

When the task is critical, trust isn’t needed, and you have the power to act without input from the other party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What must be considered when using the Insist approach?

A

Whether you have enough power to demand your way and ensure compliance.

22
Q

When might an Insist approach be appropriate?

A

In a crisis when time is short.

23
Q

Why is Insist not suitable for long-term solutions?

A

Because it doesn’t typically lead to durable, collaborative outcomes.

24
Q

Insist Strategy Bumper Sticker?

A

“Take it or Leave it” or “Today - Do it My Way!”

25
What is the Settle approach used for?
When resolution is needed quickly, Insist is not right, and Comply is not preferred. It’s efficient but rarely results in optimal outcomes.
26
Settle Strategy Bumper Sticker?
“Let’s just split the difference and call it a day.”
27
Describe the relationship factor in the Settle approach.
Relationship matters, but improving it isn’t paramount.
28
In the Settle approach, what’s assumed about trust?
It may or may not be important; trust is neutral.
29
How is information treated in the Settle approach?
Opposite is seen as mostly truthful; info shared slowly.
30
How is power viewed in the Settle approach?
Power is likely evenly divided; both sides control outcome.
31
What characterizes Cooperative/Interest-Based Negotiation (IBN)?
Focus on interests (why) instead of just positions (what).
32
What are the three types of interests in IBN?
Procedural, Psychological, and Substantive.
33
What are procedural interests?
Interests about how processes are conducted.
34
What are psychological interests?
How people feel, are perceived, and relate to others.
35
What are substantive interests?
Tangible things like salaries, prices, or physical needs.
36
In IBN, how should information be handled?
Freely and openly shared; critical for building options.
37
IBN Strategy Bumper Sticker?
“Let’s work together and come up with an even better solution.”
38
How can emotions affect negotiation?
Negative emotions can prevent mutually satisfactory agreements.
39
What are common biases in negotiation?
Age, Sex, Race, Rank, Religion, Political, AFSC.
40
What is "Thin Slicing"? What can thin slicing lead to?
Making decisions based on limited information. Being aware of how your behavior affects others.
41
High vs. low self-monitoring—what’s the difference?
High: “What does this situation require?” Low: “How can I be me in this situation?”
42
What is active listening? What are key active listening behaviors?
Listening to understand, not to judge or reply. Summarize, clarify, don’t interrupt, and focus fully.
43
Why shift negotiation approach?
To find mutually beneficial solutions and improve communication.
44
Describe sources of conflict (factors)
○ Communication Factors ○ Structural Factors ○ Personal Behaviour Factors ○ What are the stakes ? ○ What is the situation ?
45
Conflict Management Styles
Competing Avoiding Compromising Accommodating Collaborating
46
CONFLICT STYLES Competing (Forcing)
(High assertiveness and low cooperativeness.) Attempts to overwhelm an opponent with formal authority, threats, or the use of power.
47
CONFLICT STYLES Avoiding
(Low assertiveness and low cooperativeness.) Appears to indicate a neutral position of participants which can often lead to ‘things working themselves out,’ but can also result in an escalation of a situation by allowing it to go unresolved.
48
CONFLICT STYLES Compromising
(Some assertiveness and some cooperativeness.) Requires a willingness of both parties to change, adjust, or give something up. Involves behavior that seeks to partially satisfy both parties’ desires and resolves the conflict.
49
CONFLICT STYLES Accommodating
(Low assertiveness and high cooperativeness.) Often simply consists of giving in to another person’s wishes.
50
CONFLICT STYLES Collaborating
(High assertiveness and high cooperativeness). Uses an attempt to satisfy the concerns of both sides through honest discussion. Creative approaches to conflict reduction, such as sharing resources, may lead to both parties being materially better off. Trust and openness are required of all participants. Involves behavior that seeks a ‘win’ position for both groups.