Data Sufficiecy Flashcards
- In a certain year the United Nations total expenditures were $1.6billion. Of this amount, 67.8% was paid by the 6 highest contributing countries, and the balance was paid by the remaining 153 countries. Was country x among the 6 highest contributing countries?
- 56 percent of the total expenditures was paid by the highest - contributing countries, each of which paid more than country x.
- Country x paid 4.8 percent of the total expenditures
SPOILER: E
Good post? |
United Nations= total expenditures $1.6billion
6 highest contributing countries = 67.8% i.e. av (11.30) per country i
153 countries = 32.2% i.e. (.2% per country)
Question = Was country x among the 6 highest contributing countries?
Using 1.
Top 5 Contributing nations = 56 percent of the total expenditures
Each paid more than x
If top countries paid - 56, we are not clear how many countries constitute the top that contributed 56%
There can be no relation that can be derived about the expenditure made by x
2) If country x paid = 4.8%
here 4.8% could constitute the top 6 or it can be the bottom 153.
Only if x constituted less than .2% then we could tell that it was part of bottom 153. else had it been greater than 12% or so, we could have made some definite reply
If x,y and z are integers and xy + z is an odd integer, is x an even integer?
- xy + xz is an even integer
- y + xz is an odd integer
SPOILER: A
xy + z is an odd integer
This means
CASE 1
xy is odd and z is even
x and y => odd
z=> even
CASE 2
xy is even and z is odd
either one of x and y is even or both of them are even
z=> odd
Ques=> Is x even?
Statement 1: xy + xz is an even integer If we take case 1 xy is odd hence to make xy+xz even xz too should be odd this cant be possible because z is even
now we consider case 2 xy is even so in order to make xy+xz to be even .. xz too should be even we know that z is odd hence x has to be even
This statement is Sufficient
Statement 2
y + xz is an odd integer
for y+xz to be odd
i)
y is odd and
xz is even
let us take case 1 again
xy is odd and z is even
but this isnt possible because z is even
now lets look at case 2
xy is even and z is odd
y+xz is odd
y is odd
now if xy is even and y is odd
x has to be even
ii)
y is even
xz is odd
case 1
xy is odd and z is even
not possible becaouse z xz is odd
case 2
xy is even and z is odd
xz is odd
x has to be odd
looking at the conditions .. x could either be even or odd
Insufficient
Option
SPOILER: A
xy + z is an odd integer
This means
CASE 1
xy is odd and z is even
x and y => odd
z=> even
CASE 2
xy is even and z is odd
either one of x and y is even or both of them are even
z=> odd
Ques=> Is x even?
Statement 1: xy + xz is an even integer If we take case 1 xy is odd hence to make xy+xz even xz too should be odd this cant be possible because z is even
now we consider case 2 xy is even so in order to make xy+xz to be even .. xz too should be even we know that z is odd hence x has to be even
This statement is Sufficient
Statement 2
y + xz is an odd integer
for y+xz to be odd
i)
y is odd and
xz is even
let us take case 1 again
xy is odd and z is even
but this isnt possible because z is even
now lets look at case 2
xy is even and z is odd
y+xz is odd
y is odd
now if xy is even and y is odd
x has to be even
ii)
y is even
xz is odd
case 1
xy is odd and z is even
not possible becaouse z xz is odd
case 2
xy is even and z is odd
xz is odd
x has to be odd
Option
SPOILER: A
Originally Posted by adt29
I did the problem this way.
Factored out 9^x. So we have the equation simplified to:
9^x (1+ 9^1 + 9^2 + 9^3 + 9^4 + 9^5) = y.
Since odd powers of 9 end in 9, the sum of ( 9^1 + 9^2 + 9^3 + 9^4 + 9^5 ) will end in 9. If you add a ‘1’ to that, you get some number that ends in ‘0’.
Now if x=1/2 which is not an integer, 9^(1/2) = 3. And 3 times a number that ends in 0, will give you a number that is divisible by 5.
So doesn’t statemtnet 2 get refuted? What am I missing here?
I didn;t get it. Why would you refute B.
You were right all through out.
(9^x) X (10y) = multiple of 10 only if
we can prove that 9^x will not result in a fraction or an irrational number.
Both A and B prove the statement therefore D is the right answer
Of the 75 houses in a certaion community, 48 have a pation. How many of the houses in the community have a swimming pool?
- 38 of the houses in the community have a pation but do not have a swimming pool
- The number of houses in the community that have a patio and a swimming is equal to the number of houses in the community that have neither a swimming pool nor a patio.
SPOILER: B
Total Number of Houses in the Community (T) = Houses with Patio (P) + Houses with Swimming Pool (S) - Houses with both (S and P) + Houses with (neither S and P)
T = P + S - (PxS) + !(P or S)
Statement 1)
38 houses have Patio but no S. Here the statement does not consider that there could be houses that may not have both a Patio and a Swimming Pool therefore Not Sufficient
Statement 2)
Suggests that Houses have both P and S = Houses having neither P or S.
Putting back in our equation above:
T = P + S - (PxS) + !(P or S) (PxS) = ! (P or S)
Therefore T = P + S
T = 75
P = 38
S = 27
B is the right answer
Q1. If x and y are positive integers, is xy a multiple of 8?
(1) GCD of x and y = 10
(2) LCM of x and y = 100
(folks, frustratingly enough , despite working quite a bit on number properties, I got this wrong…I know this is fairly basic but please post explanations)
SPOILER: Official Answer=C
Q2. Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)?
(1) p = r
(2) r > 0
SPOILER: Official Answer=C
Originally Posted by dominicsavio
Q1. Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)?
(1) p = r
(2) r > 0
SPOILER: Official Answer=C
Statement 1:
If we replace p with r, the target question becomes “Is 1/r > r/(r^2 + 2)?”
In this form, it might be tough to answer the new target question.
However, since (r^2 + 2) must be positive, we can multiply both sides of the target question by (r^2 + 2) to get a new target question: Is (r^2 + 2)/r > r?
From here, we can simplify the left-hand-side to get Is r + 2/r > r?
Finally, if we subtract r from both sides of the target question, we get Is 2/r > 0?
At this point, it’s easy to answer the target question.
2/r can be greater than zero or it can be less than zero.
As such, statement 1 is not sufficient.
Statement 2:
Since we are given no information about p, statement 2 is not sufficient.
Statements 1 AND 2:
Statement 1 allowed us to rewrite the question as Is 2/r > 0?
Since statement 2 tells us that r is positive, we can now answer the new target question with certainty (2/r is definitely greater than zero).
So, the answer is
SPOILER: C
Cheers,
Brent
Q6:
a four sided figure abcd
In the figure shown, line segment AD is parallel to line segment BC. What is the value of x?
(1) y = 50
(2) z = 40
Answer is D
Good post? |
IMO answer is A
AC is the traversal cutting the parallel lines BC and AD
- Alternate angles y=x=50.Hence sufficient
- z=40 but value of y is unknown.Even though we know the exterior angle theorem that angle= angle y+ angle z, we are still helpless as value of angle y is known to find value of angle x. hence insufficient.
So answer is A.
The GMAT is scored on a scale of 200 to 800 in 10 point increments. (Thus 410 and 760 are real GMAT scores but 412 and 765 are not). A first-year class at a certain business school consists of 478 students. Did any students of the same gender in the first-year class who were born in the same-named month have the same GMAT score?
(1) The range of GMAT scores in the first-year class is 600 to 780.
(2) 60% of the students in the first-year class are male.
Given: If scores are between 200 and 800 then there are 60 scores possible. Assuming worst case, each kid is born in a different month so and different kids in the same month score different GMAT scores Therefore: 1260 males and 1260 ladies are possible720 males and 720 ladies can go without any repetition.
Option A If range = 600 - 780 then 18 scores possible. And the maximum again becomes 18*12= 216So if males = 217 and ladies = 217 then there has to be a repetitionIf total kids = 478 then minimum boys = 478/2 = 239 and so with ladies which is greater than 217 so it is sufficient
Option B Males = 227. Can’t say. We need more than 712 of the same gender to prove the point so not sufficient
Official Answer please? imo = A
Is 2x - 3y > x2 ?
(1) 2x - 3y = -2
(2) X >2 and y > 0
SPOILER: Official Answer: D. i know its simple but took me more than few mins to get to it.. can anybody explain it better?
Nice question, Lav.
Target question: Is 2x - 3y > x2 ?
Statement 1: 2x - 3y = -2
Let’s take the target question and replace 2x - 3y with -2
We get: Is -2 > x2 ?
The square of any number must be greater than or equal to zero, so we can be certain that -2 is not greater than x2 .
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2: x >2 and y > 0
Let’s first take the original target question (Is 2x - 3y > x2 ?) and subtract 2x from both sides
We get: Is -3y > x2 - 2x ?
Now factor the right hand side to get: Is -3y > x(x - 2) ?
Well since y>0, we know that -3y will be negative
Since x>2, we know that x(x-2) must be positive (since x-2 must be positive)
So, the target question is really asking Is some negative number > some positive number ?
We can answer this question with certainty (some negative number is not greater than some positive number)
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is sufficient.
So, the answer is
SPOILER: D
Cheers,
Brent
At 9 a.m, a hiker was due south of point P. What direction was point P from her position at noon?
- From 9 a.m to 11 a.m,she walked due east at 2 miles per hr, and from 11 a.m until noon, she walked due north at 3 miles per hr.
- At noon, she is exactly 4.5 miles from point P.
The answer is E. At noon, we know: a) the hiker is 4 miles east of point P b) the hiker is 4.5 miles from point P Unfortunately, we don't know whether the hiker is north or south of point P (so the answer is E, since the question asks us to find the direction from P)
Example:
- If the hiker is 1.5 miles south of point P at 9am, then at noon the hiker will be 1.5 miles north of P
- If the hiker is 4.5 miles south of point P at 9am, then at noon the hiker will be 1.5 miles south of P
In both cases, the hiker would be the same distance away from point P, but the direction would be different.
Cheers,
Brent
If x > 1, what is the value ofinteger x?
(1) There are x unique factors of x.
(2) The sum of x and any prime number larger than x is odd.
The answer logic starts by mentioning that (1) tells us that there are x unique factors of x. In order for this to be true, EVERY integer between 1 and x, inclusive, must be a factor of x.
Can some one explain (with example) what does it mean???
Originally Posted by tarunlakhani
If x > 1, what is the value ofinteger x?
(1) There are x unique factors of x.
(2) The sum of x and any prime number larger than x is odd.
The answer logic starts by mentioning that (1) tells us that there are x unique factors of x. In order for this to be true, EVERY integer between 1 and x, inclusive, must be a factor of x.
Can some one explain (with example) what does it mean???
Let’s say that x=2.
Notice that 2 has 2 positive factors (divisors). They are 1 and 2
So, if x=2, we satisfy the condition that there are x unique factors of x.
Conversely, if x=3, the condition is not met.
Notice that 3 has only 2 positive factors. They are 1 and 3
Aside: the answer logic says “(1) tells us that there are x unique factors of x. In order for this to be true, EVERY integer between 1 and x, inclusive, must be a factor of x.”
Given the present wording of the question, this is logic incorrect. The present wording allows for factors that are negative as well.
Now I’m assuming that the question is meant to restrict factors to positive factors, but this is not explicitly stated.
Okay, if we restrict x to being positive and we restrict the factors to being positive, statement 1 tells us that x must equal either 1 or 2. These are the only values where the number of positive factors equals the number itself.
I won’t go any further, since the question, it its current form, has too many ambiguities.
Cheers,
Brent
Online video lessons | GMAT Prep Now
If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?
(1) k is divisible by 4.
(2) k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.
PLEASE EXPLAIN.
Originally Posted by cinghal1
If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?
(1) k is divisible by 4.
(2) k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.
PLEASE EXPLAIN.
(E) it is
(1) k is divisible by 4 => k can be a square of an interger (16, 64 ….) or not a square (12, 24 …) => insuff
(2) k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers. Again, k can be or not a square of an interger.
For example: Let’s say k is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7
If k = 210 = (2x3x5x7) => k is not a square
If k = 6300 = (2x2x3x3x5x5x7x7) => k is the square of 210
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) and (c, d) equidistant from the origin?
(1) a/b = c/d
(2) root a square + root b square = root c square + root d square
SPOILER: Official Answer: C
Using distance formula we know that the given 2 points are equidistant from the origin when
: sqrt (a^2+b^2)=sqrt (c^2+d^2).
(Note that change in Xs and Ys for both points are actually the Xs and Ys of those points due to the fact that the question asks distance from “the origin”).
1/5=2/10 but if we square them we’ll get different answer. On the other hand 1/5= -1/-5 and these points are equidistant from the origin. INS.
By simplifying the equation we get: a+b=c+d, 2+4=1+5 but if we square each term then we see that 20 doesn’t equal 26. On the other hand 2+4=4+2 and the sum of their squares are equal.
INS.
For both statements let’s take poor mathematical approach, just for fun:
Question: a^2+b^2= c^2+d^2 if ad=bc and a+b=c+d? a=c+d-b ((c+d)-b)^2+b^2= c^2+d^2 (c+d )^2-2b(c+d)+b^2+b^2= c^2+d^2 c^2+2cd+d^2-2bc-2bd+2b^2=c^2+d^2 2cd-2bc-2bd+2b^2=0 cd-bc-bd+b^2=0 -bc+b^2= bd- cd b(b-c)=d(b-c) b=d If b=d we know that a=c (statement 2 (we cannot use statement 1 for that conclusion> if b and d equal 0 then a and c can equal any number)) and if two coordinates are equal it means that the points share the same coordinates and they are equidistant from the origin. SUFF C
If a, b, and c are three consecutive prime numbers such that a
from 1,
b=a+2=(a+b+c)/3
==> a+4=c
and we have a+2=b
the 3 primes are a,a+2,a+4
only 3,5,7 satisfies
2) suff.
If x,y and z are integers and xy+z is an odd integer, is x an even integer?
- xy and xz is an even integer
- y + xz is an odd integer
SPOILER: A
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Good post? |
from question stem, one of the xy & z is to be odd.
from stem 1, xy & xz = even. SO, xy must be even. so, z= odd (question stem).AS xz is even, X must be even. Sufficient. (B,C and E out)
from stem 2, one of xz or y is to be odd. let x=odd,y=odd and z=even. Question stem -(oo+e = o) OK and stem 2, (o+oe = o OK)
AGAIN, if x = e, y=o & z=o,question stem (eo+o=o) and stem 2 (o+oe = o). STILL OK. (D out)
A is the pick.
(under exam situation it will be a very tough question)
Good post? |
Co-Ordinates
1. In the xy - co-ordinate plane, line L and line K intersect at point (4,3). Is the product of their slopes negative?
1. The product of the x-intercepts of the lines L and K is positive
2. The product of the y - intercepts of the lines L and K is negative
SPOILER: C
The product of the slopes is negative, if one line is slanted “downwards” and the other one “upwards”.
Insufficient, try 1 and 6 (negative and positive slopes) and then try 6 and 6 (negative slopes) , 2 and 2 (positive slopes) , -5 and -2 (positive slopes).
Insufficient, try 1 and -1 (positive slopes), 4 and -6 (positive and negative slopes).
Both: The line which has negative y intercept, and one of its points lie in the first quadrant, must have positive x intercept and a positive slope .
The line which has positive y intercept and positive x intercept must have negative slope.
Thus the product of the slopes is negative. Suff. C
What is the greatest common divisor of positive integers m and n?
- m is a prime number
- 2n = 7m
Originally Posted by kjain
Brent, I feel that answer to first question should be E, because even by combining both conditions, I am unable to find GCD. Can you pls provide an explaination to this question.
Statement 1:
If m is a prime number, it has exactly 2 divisors (1 and m), so this tells us that the GCD of m and n must be either 1 or m.
Since we know nothing about n, statement 1 is not sufficient.
Statement 2:
If 2n = 7m then we can rearrange the equation to get n = (7/2)m
Important aside: Notice that if m were to equal an odd number, then n would not be an integer. For example, if m=3, then n=21/2. Similarly, if m=11, then n=77/2. For n to be an integer, m must be even.
So, for example, we could have m=2 and n=7, in which case the GCD=1
We could also have m=4 and n=14, in which case the GCD=2
We could also have m=10 and n=35, in which case the GCD=5 . . . and so on.
Since we cannot determine the GCD with any certainty, statement 2 is not sufficient.
Statements 1 & 2
From statement 1, we know that m is prime, and from statement 2, we know that m is even.
Since 2 is the only even prime number, we can conclude that m must equal 2.
If m=2, then n must equal 7, which means that the GCD must be 1.
Since we are able to determine the GCD with certainty, statements 1 & 2 combined are sufficient, and the answer is
SPOILER: C
Cheers,
Brent
Good post? |
DS - number properties
If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?
a. Every factor of s is also a factor of r
b. Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r
In my opinion A.
from a) if EVERY factor of s (denominator) is also factor of r (numerator), THEN r/s must be an integer. let s= 12 (factors, 1,2,3,4,6,12) r= 36(1,2,3,4,6,9,12,18,36)
Here EVERY factor of s (1,2,3,4,6,12) is also factor of r (1,2,3,4,6,9,12,18,36) . r/s = 36/12 = 3 (an integer). PLEASE NOTE: all the factors of r is not (9,18,36) factor of s, so if we devide s by r we will not get an integer. (12/36) = 0.33.
(sufficient)
from b) common prime factors can not ensure (as we dont know about their power) divisibility
let r = 6, S =12 Prime factorization of r= 2*3 Prime factorization of s=2^2 * 3 Here both r and s share s same prime factor (2,3) BUT r/s = 6/12 = 0.5 (not an integer) let r=12, s=6, r/s= 12/6 = 2. (integer) So we can not be sure. (not sufficient)
If Line k in the xy-plane has equation y = mx + b, where m and b are constants, what is the slope of k?
(1) k is parallel to the line with equation y = (1-m)x + b +1.
(2) k intersects the line with equation y = 2x + 3 at the point (2, 7)
Originally Posted by missionGMAT
If Line k in the xy-plane has equation y = mx + b, where m and b are constants, what is the slope of k?
(1) k is parallel to the line with equation y = (1-m)x + b +1.
(2) k intersects the line with equation y = 2x + 3 at the point (2, 7)
We know that if we write the equation of line in slope y-intercept form, y = mx + b, then m = the slope of the line and b = the y-intercept of the line.
The target question asks us to find the slope of line k, so we can reword the target question to be “What is the value of m?”
Statement 1:
We know that if 2 lines are parallel, their slopes must be equal.
So, the slope of line k is equal to the slope of the line with the equation y = (1-m)x + b +1
What is the slope of the line y = (1-m)x + b +1?
Well, since the equation y = (1-m)x + b +1 is written in slope y-intercept form, we can see that the slope of this line is 1-m
We also know that the slope of line k is m
Since the two lines are parallel, their slopes are equal, which means that 1-m = m
When we solve this equation, we get m = 1/2
Since we are able to find the value of m with certainty, statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2
All this really tells us is that line line k passes through the point (2,7).
Since there are a lot of different lines (with different slopes) that can pass through the point (2,7), there is no way to determine the slope of line k with any certainty.
As such, statement 2 is not sufficient, and the answer is A
Cheers,
Brent
If 2^(-2k) =14. Along with -2 it gives a negative exponent ….if 2 is a prime, then k=14, if 3 is the first prime k=15. SUFFICIENT
IMO B.
K>-2
- K can be any odd number above -2. Insf
- K-12 is prime and K >-2
K can have values 14, 15, 17, 23…..
Insuff
1 and 2 together….Still not suff, as 2 is the only even prime number….
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b-a at least twice the value of 3^n-2^n?
1) a=2^(n+1) and b=3^(n+1)
2) n=3
Good post? | 1) 3^n*3- 2^n*2 > 2*(3^n-2^n)? 3^n*3- 2^n*2-2*3^n+2*2^n >0? 3^n*3-2*3^n>0? 3^n>0? answer is definitely yes suff. 2) we don’t know values of b and a, thus ins
A
Hi,
The question in Official Guide Ed.11 (128):
If x is an integer,is x|x|
Good post? |
1) Look at x as a negative scalar, more x moves left direction of the number line, the
“more negative” becomes xIxI, break even value for x=-2, when -2I-2I=2*(-2)
ins
2) Just plug in -10 (we already know that when x is negative, -2 is break even value and left hand side of inequality would be less than right hand side.
Suff
B
P.S. I don’t get your question.
If b, c, and d are constants and x2 + bx + c = (x + d)2 for all values of x, what is the value of c?
(1) d = 3
(2) b = 6
Originally Posted by crazy800
Official Answer is D
I put it in the form
x^2 + bx + c = x^2 + 2dx+ d^2
i feel like i read somewhere in secondary level that in such cases, we can write in this form
c = d^2 and bx = 2dx
if it works (1) is sufficient for sure because we get the value of d=6. as c = d^2, c = 6^2 = 36 but from (2), we can't find the value of 'd' or 'c'
No idea. Further explanation needed
You were right in the approach but I guess just missed for little
Taking thy approach furthur
x^2 + bx + c = x^2 + 2dx+ d^2
thus equating the coefficients of ax^2+bx + c we get
b = 2d -- eqn a c = d^2 --- eqn b
from Option 1) d = 3
Thus c = 9 (from eqn b)
Sufficient
from 2) b = 6
Thus d = 3 (from eqn a)
and thus c = 9 (frm eqn b)
Sufficient
Hence D
Please explain
If k, m, and t are positive integers and k/6+m/4=t/12 do t and 12 have a common factor greater than 1 ?
(1) k is a multiple of 3.
(2) m is a multiple of 3.
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Good post? |
A
(2k+3m)/12=t/12
2k+3m=t 1) If k is a multiple of 3 we can factor out 3 from (2k+3m): 3(2*n+m)=t note that 3n = k So in any case t is multiple of 3 Suff 2) m is a multiple of 3 in this case we can or cannot factor out 3, depending on value of k. e.g. if k=1 and m=9 then t=29 if k= 3 and m=3 t=15 so shares multiples 1 and 3 with 12. INS
r s t
u v w
x y z
Each of the letters in the table above represents one of the numbers 1, 2, or 3, and each of these numbers occurs exactly once in each row and exactly once in each column. What is the value of r?
(1) v + z = 6
(2) s + t + u + x = 6
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
D
Good post? | The question stem says that the value of a point 1,2 or 3. we can infer - 1. the highest value 3 2. the lowest value 1 3. sum of any row / column = 6.
from statement 1: v+z = 6. So, v=z=3. So, none of the alphabet in any row or column can be 3 ! R must be 3. Sufficient.
from statement 2:Column 1 + Row1 - 2r =12.
As per inference value (sum) of any column = 6. For the same reason value of any row = 6
Now, C1+R1 = 6+6 =12.
C1+R1 - 2r =6 => 2r=C1+R1 -6 => 2r = 12-6 => r =6/2 => r =3 . SUFFICIENT.
D is the pick
If x and y are positive, is x3 > y?
(1) x^1/2 > y
(2) x > y
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Good post? |
x can be between 0 and 1
thus E
Is x less than y?
(1) x-y+1<0
The Official Answer given is A, which I think is wrong. Please comment.
Originally Posted by missionGMAT
Is x less than y?
(1) x-y+1< x+1 and x-1 < x
The target question asks “Is x < y?”
Statement 1: x-y+1< y
Since we also know that x < x+1, we can combine the two inequalities to get x < x+1 < y
From this we can see that x < y, so statement 1 is sufficient
Statement 2: x-y-1< y
Now we also know that x-1 < x, but what can we do with this?
We know that x and y are both greater than x-1, but we cannot say for certain whether or not y is greater than x.
As such, statement 2 is not sufficient and the answer is A
Cheers,
Brent
For a set of 3 numbers, assuming there is only one mode, does the mode equal the range?
The median equals the range
The largest number is twice the value of the smallest number
Originally Posted by missionGMAT
For a set of 3 numbers, assuming there is only one mode, does the mode equal the range?
The median equals the range
The largest number is twice the value of the smallest number
Notice that if all 3 numbers are different, then we will have 3 different modes. So, if there is only 1 mode, then there are two possible cases:
case a: 2 numbers are equal and the 3rd number is different
case b: all 3 numbers are the same
Statement 1:
If the median equals the range, does the mode equal the range?
Well, does the median equal the mode here? The answer is yes. Here’s why:
If we have case a, then the median must equal the mode (since it would be impossible for the middle-most number to be different from the other 2 values).
So, the median = mode = range
If we have case b, then the median must equal the mode, since all 3 numbers are equal.
So, the median = mode = range
Since we can be certain that the mode equals the range, statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2:
We can use counter-examples to show that this statement is not sufficient.
The 3 numbers could be 3, 3, 6 in which case the mode equals the range
The 3 numbers could be 3, 6, 6 in which case the mode does not equal the range
So, the answer is A
A. Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all the employees on the task force.
SPOILER: C
The DS wants to know whetehr the percentage of directors can be known.
let us consider
total employee (count) - x
director (count) - d
manager (count) - x-d
average salary of total employee = a
we have to find - d/x-d = ? or d/x = ? or d/ x-d = ?
from stem 1:
(x-d)(a+5000) = …? we just have the connection between agerage salary of managers to average salay of all employee. as no other information is given to fill-up the right hand side of equation. we even can not go further. INSUFFICIENT. A, D OUT.
from stem 2:
d(a+15000) = …. ? the explanation is reciprocal for d (as per stem 1). B OUT.
LET US COMBINE -(x-d)(a-5000)+d(a+15000) = ax
=> xa - ad - 5000x - 5000d + ad + 15000d = ax
=> xa -ax - 5000 x + 15000d = 0
=> 5000x= 15000 d
=> x = (15000/5000)d
=>x/d =3 ( we got the ratio)
c is the pick.
alternatively, we can choose signs for average salaries of d,m.
Thus C is the answer.
S is a set of integers such that
i) if a is in S, then –a is in S, and
ii) if each of a and b is in S, then ab is in S.
Is –4 in S?
(1) 1 is in S.
(2) 2 is in S.
Originally Posted by missionGMAT S is a set of integers such that i) if a is in S, then –a is in S, and ii) if each of a and b is in S, then ab is in S. Is –4 in S?
(1) 1 is in S.
(2) 2 is in S.
Statement 1:
All we can conclude is that 1 and -1 are in set S
INSUFF
Statement 2:
If 2 is in set S, then -2 is in set S (by rule i).
If 2 and -2 are in set S, then we can conclude is that -4 is in set S (by rule ii)
SUFF
So, the answer is B
- If y is >or = 0, what is the value of x?
- /x-3/ >or= y
- /x-3/
B
C
If A,B and c are lines in a plane, is Aperpendicu*lar to C?
(1) A is perpendicular to B.
(2) B is perpendicular to C.
I know its an easy one..but i guess I am missing something. Please provide your explanations.
Good post? |
Draw it and you will see that A is parallel to C .
(C)
On his trip from Alba to Benton, Julio drove the first x miles at an average rate of 50 miles per hour and the remaining distance at an average rate of 60 miles per hour. How long did it take Julio to drive the first x miles
- On this trip, Julio drove for a total of 10 hours and drove a total of 530 miles
- On this trip, it took Julio 4 more hours to drive the first x miles than to drive the remaining distance
SPOILER: A
06-30-2011, 08:27 AM #2
missionGMAT
Within my grasp!
Join Date May 2011 Location Singapore Posts 110 Rep Power 2
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Good post? |
Official Answer is A.
Lets examine the question first. We have been given considerable data in the question itself:
Let t be the time taken to drive first x miles and t’ be the time taken to drive the rest of distance. Let total distance be Y. So from the given data, we can form the following equations:
x= 50t and Y-x = 60t' . We need to find t.
Statement 1:
Trough this statement we get, t+t’ = 10 and Y = 530.
We had four variables in the equations from statement so we need atleast four equations to find the value. After combining the equations from statement 1, we get the desired result. Hence SUFFICIENT
Statement 2:
We cannot get two more equations, hence INSUFFICIENT.
Guests at a recent party ate a total of fifteen hamburgers. Each guest who was neither a student nor a vegetarian ate exactly one hamburger. No hamburger was eaten by any guest who was a student, a vegetarian, or both. If half of the guests were vegetarians, how many guests attended the party?
(1) The vegetarians attended the party at a rate of 2 students to every 3 non-students, half the rate for non-vegetarians.
(2) 30% of the guests were vegetarian non-students.
Really A tough one !!!
A is my pick.
Critical point is - the question stem contains a LOT of information REQUIRED to solve the DS.
Let us consider the stem-
Guests at a recent party ate a total of fifteen hamburgers. Note - 15 hamburgers were eaten.
Each guest who was neither a student nor a vegetarian ate exactly one hamburger. Note - Only NON student and NON-veg 1 burger each. Note - 2: there must be 15 guests who were neither Student nor Veg.
No hamburger was eaten by any guest who was a student, a vegetarian, or both. Note -ONLY non student and non veg ate 1 burger each.
If half of the guests were vegetarians, Note - 50% of the guests were veg. Note 2: 50% of the guests were NON-VEG.
how many guests attended the party?
Links - we have -
1. the number of burger eaten (15 nos.)
2. Veg - 50%
3. Non-veg - 50%
4. Non-Veg Non-students eaten burger . S, their % will be equal to 15 nos.
We have to check whether we get sufficient information to find the % of non-veg & non-student.
From St 1:
(1) The vegetarians attended the party at a rate of 2 students to every 3 non-students, half the rate for non-vegetarians.
Veg guest - 50%. Ratio of Student (veg) and Non-student ( veg) - 2:3.
So, Student (veg) - 20% and Non-student (Veg) - 30%.
As this rate is half the rate for non-veg. for non veg Student : Non-student - 4:3 ~ 29% : 21% (SUFFICIENT).
we get the % of Non veg non student - ~ 21%.
St 1 alone is sufficient.
Now for Statement 2
(2) 30% of the guests were vegetarian non-students.
Total veg - 50%
Veg non student - 30%. So, veg Student 20%
Here we have no information of link / hints about NON - VEG STUDENT / NON VEG NON STUDENT.
INSUFFICIENT !
We can not solve for % of non-student non-veg = 15
Please correct me if I am wrong.
What is the source of this question ?
Official Answer ?
From May 1 to May 30 in the same year, the balance in a checking account increased. What was the balance in the checking account on May 30?
1) If, during this period of time, the increase in the balance in the checking account had been 12%, then the balance in the account on May 30 would have been $504
2) During this period of time, the balance in the checking account was 8%
The answer says A, but I don’t see how we can get the answer from A, as we can only find the beginning balance but we still don’t know the rate of increase? Can someone please explain?
Confusion between a and c
There is no doubt in miy mind that the answer is C, lets take a real life example:
Man: My bank account increased so much this month!
Woman: How much was the ending balance?
Man: Lets put it this way if it increased by 12% the ending balance would have been $504!
Woman: Ok, that gives me your beginning balanace, but how much did it ACTUALLY increase?
Man: 8%
Woman: Ah, now I can figure it out.
C
People are mistaking finding ANY ending balance with finding THE ending balance.
For instance if statement (2) was:
If, during this period of time, the increase in the balance in the checking account had been 14%, then the balance in the account on May 30 would have been $513.
The answer could not be D, there could not have been two ending balanaces, therefore, the answer would be E because we DO NOT know the ACTUAL increase.
Parabola
Shown: Parabola with a vertex (0;0) .
The line L is parallel to X axis. Is the distance between the points (A;B) and (C;D)equal to the distance between the points (C;D) and (E;F)?
1) The distances between the points> (A;B) and the origin and >(G;H) and the Origin are
Equal.
2) The equation of the parabola is: Y=X^2
Good post? |
The answer is E
If we knew the additional information: exact distance between (A;B) and the origin and (G;H) and the Origin; then we would have been able to determine the answer.
If the distance between (A;B) and the origin and (G;H) and the Origin = 1/4 then
the distances between the points (A;B) and (C;D) and the points (C;D) and (E;F)are equal, otherwise they aren’t equal
If n is an integer and x^n – x^-n = 0, what is the value of x ?
(1) x is an integer.
(2) n ≠ 0
Good post? |
(1) x is an integer. xn = x(-n)=> x2n = 1 = x0 2n = 0 => n = 0 If n = 0 then x^n – x^-n = 0 will be true for all values of x. INSUFFICIENT (2) n ≠ 0 xn = x(-n)=> x2n = 1 => x = 1 or x = -1 INSUFFICIENT Combining both statements, x = 1 or x = -1 INSUFFICIENT Hence E.
IF X & Y are positive, is 3X > 7Y ?
1) X > Y + 4
2) -5X < -14Y
SPOILER: Official Answer D. I guess its B
Originally Posted by shyamprasadrao
IF X & Y are positive, is 3X > 7Y ?
1) X > Y + 4
2) -5X < -14Y
SPOILER: Official Answer D. I guess its B
Statement 1: We can use counter examples to show this is insufficient
case a: x=10, y=1 gives us 3x is greater than 7y
case b: x=10, y=5 gives us 3x is not greater than 7y
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: -5X < -14Y
Multiply both sides by -1 to get: 5x > 14y
Multiply both sides by 3/5 to get: 3x > 42y/5
Big point: If y is positive, then it must be true that 42y/5 > 7y.
We can now add this inequality to the existing inequality to get: 3x > 42y/5 > 7y
From here we can see that 3x > 7y, which means statement 2 IS SUFFICIENT and the answer is B
If W & C are integers, is W > 0?
1) W+C > 50
2) C>48
SPOILER: Official Answer C. I guess they are missing the condition where C can be say 52 and W is -1. Please advice
Good post? |
The target question asks us whether W is positive.
Statements 1 and 2 combined: We can use counter examples to show that the statements combined are not sufficient.
Given the conditions in both statements, there are (at least) 2 cases:
Case a: C=52 and W=-1, so W is negative
Case b: C=52 and W=1, so W is positive
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the statements combined are not sufficient.
So, the answer is E
I think this is a nice upper-level question for students to tackle. Enjoy!
If x is a positive integer, is x divisible by 2?
(1) x^3 + x is divisible by 4.
(2) 5x + 4 is divisible by 6.
Answer:
SPOILER: soon
Cheers,
Brent
Good post? |
Okay, I’ll post my version of a solution:
Statement 1: x^3 + x is divisible by 4
When we factor the expression we see that x(x^2 + 1) is divisible by 4
For x(x^2 + 1) to be divisible by 4, there are essentially 3 possible cases to consider:
case a: x is divisible by 4 (in which case x is divisible by 2)
case b: x is divisible by 2, and x^2 + 1 is divisible by 2 (in which case x is divisible by 2)
case c: x^2 + 1 is divisible by 4, and x is not divisible by 2
case b is impossible, for the following reason: If x is even (i.e., divisible by 2) then x^2 is also even, in which case x^2 + 1 is odd. If x^2 + 1 is odd, it cannot be divisible by 2
case c is impossible for the following reason: First, if x^2 + 1 is divisible by 4, then x^2 + 1 is even, in which case x^2 is odd. If x^2 is odd, then x must be odd.
Now, if x must be odd, it is not possible for x^2 + 1 to be divisible by 4
We know this because, if x is odd, we can say that x = 2k+1 for some integer k (all odd numbers can be written as 2k+1)
This means that:
x^2 + 1 = (2k+1)^2 + 1
= 4k^2 + 4k + 2
= 4(k^2 + k) + 2
Since 4(k^2 + k) is definitely divisible by 4, we can see that 4(k^2 + k) + 2 is NOT divisible by 4, which means x^2 + 1 is NOT divisible by 4.
If x^2 + 1 is NOT divisible by 4, we can eliminate case c, which means case a MUST be true, which means x MUST be divisible by 2.
So, statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2: 5x + 4 is divisible by 6
If 5x + 4 is divisible by 6, we know that 5x+4 must be divisible by 2, which means 5x+4 is even
If 5x+4 is even, 5x must be even (since EVEN + EVEN = EVEN)
If 5x is even, x must be even (since ODD x EVEN = EVEN)
If x is even, then x is divisible by 2
So, statement 2 is sufficient, and the answer is D
If x is a positive integer, is the remainder 0 when (3x + 1)/10?
(1) x = 3n + 2, where n is a positive integer.
(2) x > 4
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is
sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
SPOILER: E
Originally Posted by albema
If x is a positive integer, is the remainder 0 when (3x + 1)/10?
(1) x = 3n + 2, where n is a positive integer.
(2) x > 4
SPOILER: E
Statement 1: If x = 3n + 2, then 3x + 1 = 3(3n + 2) + 1 = 9n + 7
So, we can now reword the target question to be “Is the remainder 0 when (9n+7)/10?”
Well, the remainder IS zero when n=7 but not when n=8
So, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2:
If x=13, then the remainder does equal 0 when (3x + 1)/10
If x=14, then the remainder does not equal 0 when (3x + 1)/10
So, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Both statements combined
At this point we know that the statements combined are not sufficient because, we already showed that statement 1 is not sufficient because n=7 and n=8 yielded different answers to our new target question.
In both cases (when n=7 and when n=8), the resulting value of x is greater than 4, so statement 2’s condition was already met.
This means the answer is E
Q1) Each of 25 balls is either red, blue, or white and has a number from 1 to 10. If one ball is selected at random, what is the probability that the ball is either white or has an even number on it?
(1) Probability that the ball is both white and has an even number = 0
(2) Probability that the ball is white minus probability that the ball has an even number = 0.2
Q2) If x and yare integers, what is xy?
(1) Greatest common factor of x and y is 10
(2) Least common multiple of x and y is 180
Q3) Is m + z > 0?
(1) m - 3z > 0
(2) 4z - m > 0
Q4) Each employee in a certain taskforce is either a manager or a director. What percent of employees are directors?
(1) Average salary of managers is %500 less than average salary of all employees
(2) Average salary of directors is $1500 greater than the average salary of all employees
Originally Posted by dominicsavio
Q1) Each of 25 balls is either red, blue, or white and has a number from 1 to 10. If one ball is selected at random, what is the probability that the ball is either white or has an even number on it?
(1) Probability that the ball is both white and has an even number = 0
(2) Probability that the ball is white minus probability that the ball has an even number = 0.2
Note that we know NOTHING about the way this group of 25 balls was generated or selected. Therefore, we have to work completely off the givens from the two cases (except that all probabilities have to be a multiple of .04).
Looking for: P(W or E) = P(W) + P(E) - P(E and W) = ?
(1) “Probability that the ball is both white and has an even number = 0”
So, P(W or E) = P(W) + P(E)
INSUFFICIENT
(2) “Probability that the ball is white minus probability that the ball has an even number = 0.2”
P(W) - P(E) = .2
P(W or E) = P(E) + P(E) + .2 - P(E and W)
P(W or E) = 2*P(E) + .2 - P(E and W)
Still INSUFFICIENT…there’s too much we don’t know!
(1) and (2)
From (1), we know that P(W and E) = 0
From (2), we know that P(W) = P(E) + .2
P(W or E) = P(W) + P(E) - P(W or E)
P(W or E) = 2*P(E) + .2
INSUFFICIENT, since P(E) can have multiple values. –> E
Q4) Each employee in a certain taskforce is either a manager or a director. What percent of employees are directors?
(1) Average salary of managers is $500 less than average salary of all employees
(2) Average salary of directors is $1500 greater than the average salary of all employees
Let D denote number of directors
Let M denote number of managers
What is D/(D+M) ?
(1) “Average salary of managers is $500 less than average salary of all employees”
Let s1 be the average salary of directors
Let s2 be the average salary of managers
s2 = (s1*D+s2*M)/(D+M) - 500 (s2+500)(D+M) = s1*D+s2*M s2*D+s2*M + 500D + 500M = s1*D+s2*M s1*D = s2*D + 500(D+M) s1*D - s2*D = 500(D+M) D/(D+M) = 500/(s1-s2)
INSUFFICIENT
(2) “Average salary of directors is $1500 greater than the average salary of all employees”
This gives the same amount of into as part 1, so INSUFFICIENT.
(1) and (2)
From part 2, we know that s1 = 1500 + (s1D+s2M)/(D+M)
(s1 - 1500) (D+M) = s1D + s2M
s1M - 1500 (D+M) = s2M
(s1 - s2)*M = 1500(D+M)
(s1-s2) = 1500(D+M)/M
Plugging this into above…
D/(D+M) = 500/(1500(D+M)/M) D/(D+M) = M/(3(D+M)) D = M/3
Therefore, D/(D+M) = D/(D+3D) = 1/4 = 25%
Answer is C
If x is a prime number, what is the value of x ?
(1) x < 15
(2) (x – 2) is a multiple of 5.
“All we know is that x is a prime number. We want enough information to determine which prime number x is. Our method, then, is to try to find more than one prime that fits with whatever information we’re given. If we can, the information is insufficient; if we can’t—if we can find only one prime that fits with the information—then the information is sufficient.
(1) INSUFFICIENT: If x < 15, x could be 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, or 13. Eliminate (A) and (D).
(2) INSUFFICIENT: If (x – 2) is a multiple of five, then x is 2 more than a multiple of 5. So the question is: Can we find more than one prime number that is 2 more than a multiple of five? Yes. Multiples of 5 are 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and so on. Two more than 5 is 7—a prime number. While 2 more than 10 is 12, which isn’t a prime number, 2 more than 15 is 17, which is prime. Eliminate (B).
In combination: statement 1 narrowed down the possible values of x to 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13. Remember that 0 is a multiple of 5 as well. So both 2 and 7 are 2 more than a multiple of 5, so we cannot find a single answer to the question using both statements. Choose (E).”
I assumed the answer was B because i didn’t know 0 is a multiple of 5. So 0 is a multiple of any integer? What’s the technical rule for this? Thanks in advance
For a trade show, two different cars are selected randomly from a lot of 20 cars. If all the cars on the lot are either sedans or convertibles, is the probability that both cars selected will be sedans greater than 3/4 ?
1) At least three-fourths of the cars are sedans.
2) The probability that both of the cars selected will be convertibles is less than 1/20.
x – total number of sedans Question: x(x-1)/(20*19)>3/4 ? 1) x≥15 Case 1 x=15 15(15-1)/19*20>3/4 ? 15*14/19*20>3/4 ? 3*14/19*4>3/4 ? 4*3*14 > 4*19*3? NO case2 x=19 19*18/19*20>3/4 ? 9/10>3/4 ? 36>30 ? Yes A insufficient 2) Y –convertibles Y/20*(Y-1)/193/4 ? 4*3/19*5>3/4? 4*3*4>19*5*3? No! We know the answer when Y=1 then x=19 YES so INS.
Both:INS (already shown)
IMO E
what are the units, tens and hundred digits of a decimal?
Eg.
0.4321
What is the units digit? What is the hundreds and what is the thousands?
Good post? |
. . . (thousands)(hundreds)(tens)(units)(DECIMAL POINT)(tenths)(hundredths)(thousandths)(ten-thousandths)…
A certain list consists of several different integers. Is the product of all the integers in the list positive?
1) The product of the greatest and smallest of the integers in the list is positive.
2) There is an even number of integers in the list
Originally Posted by dv_dheeraj
A certain list consists of several different integers. Is the product of all the integers in the list positive?
1) The product of the greatest and smallest of the integers in the list is positive.
2) There is an even number of integers in the list
Statement 1:
case a: {-3, -1} product is positive
case b: {-3, -2, -1} product is negative
INSUFFICIENT
Statement 2:
case a: {-3, -1} product is positive
case b: {-3, 1} product is negative
INSUFFICIENT
Statements 1 AND 2:
Statement 1 tells us that the smallest and largest integers are either both positive or both negative
This means that the integers in the set are either ALL positive or ALL negative
Case a: the integers in the set are ALL positive
This means the product must be positive
Case b: the integers in the set are ALL negative
Since there is an even number of integers, we can pair up every negative integer with another.
Since the product of each pair will be positive, the entire product must be positive
In both cases, the product must be positive –> SUFFICIENT C
Cheers,
Brent
Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary’s campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?
(1) The first n people donated of the total amount donated.
(2) The total amount donated was $120,000.
First, how many people contributed altogether?
n friends gave. Then n friends told n friends –> n^2 more people
So, the total number of contributors = n + n^2
Statement 1: we have a ratio: (first n people)/(all contributors) = 1/6 This means that n/(n + n^2) = 1/16 Cross multiply to get 16n = n + n^2 Subtract n from both sides: 15n = n^2 Divide both sides by n to get 15 = n SUFFICIENT
Statement 2:
500(total number of contributors) = 120,000
500(n + n^2) = 120,000
500n + 500n^2 = 120,000
Rearrange (since it’s a quadratic equation) to get 500n^2 + 500n - 120,000 = 0
Divide both sides by 500 to get n^2 + n - 240 = 0
From here we can see that if we factor, we’ll get something like (n+something)(n-something)=0
This means that one value of n will be positive and one value will be negative.
Since n must be positive, we can assume that there is only one solution here
SUFFICIENT
Aside: If you want to factor, you get (n+16)(n-15)=0
This means that n=-16 or n=15
n must equal 15
So the answer is D
If it took Carlos 1/2 hour to cycle from his house to the library yesterday, was the distance that he cycled greater then 6 miles? ( 1mile=5,280feet)
1) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was greater than 16 feet per second.
2) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was less than 18 feet per second
Answer:E we know: distance=time*rate or D=T*R Given, t=3600*1/2 So, Distance=1800*R The question asked: 1800*R>5280*6 or R>17.6 ??
stm1=>R>16; R can be greater/less than 17.6; INSUFF
stm2=>R16
If X and Y are integers and X>0, Is Y>0?
(1)7X-2Y>0
(2)-Y 2Y –>Y0, Y-Y and we know that X is an integer greater than 0. Min. value X can take is 1
So,1>-Y –> Y>-1 which means that Y can be zero and greater than zero. Hence Insuff.
conbining (1) and (2) it is still insufficient.(Ans E)
Originally Posted by Masuraha
I think the answer should be ‘A’.
From the first equation we can say (x/y) > (2/7)
Given that x>0 and x/y > 2/7 so y has to be positive and hence greater than 0.
Considering the second equation:
dividing both side by y we get -1 0. If Y to 0. INSUFF
- Is also insuff ; for example y = -3; x = 5 we also have -(-3)
Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5,000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force
SPOILER: C
Good post? |
x=number of managers
y=number of directors
To answer the question it is sufficient for us to know the ratio x:y
Now, let a=average salary of managers and b=average salary of directors
So,
Statement 1 : a = (ax+by)/(x+y) - 5000 => y(a-b)=-5000(x+y) => y(b-a)=5000(x+y) - (1)
Statement 2 : b = (ax+by)/(x+y) + 15000 => x(b-a)=15000(x+y) - (2)
Looking at the right hand sides of both the equations and assuming that neither x and y is 0, we can say that none of expressions on either side of each equation equals to zero. So, dividing (2) by (1),
x/y = 3 which gives us the ratio x:y which is sufficient to calculate the % of directors.
Hence both statements combined together is sufficient to solve the problem. Hence (C)
Reply Reply With Quote
If d is a apositive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers, what is the value of d?
- 10d is a factor of f
- d>6
SPOILER: C
Good post? |
f=30!
let’s find out how many tens there are in 30!
In order to find out the 10s we need to find out the multiples of 5.
5, 10, 15, 20 25, 30, note that 25 = 5^2.
We have 7 5s (five 5s +two 5s in 25=seven 5s) and thus 7 10s (because there are 2s there in 30! to multiply them by 5s to get 10s)
1) d can be anything from 1 up to 7
2) obviously not suff,
Both suff. d should equal 7
C
In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)
- (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
- (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) = 0
Originally Posted by Bobogee In the xy-plane, oes the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s) 1. (3r+2-5)(4r+9-5) = 0 2. (4r-6-5)(3r+2-5) = 0 SPOILER: C Hi Bobogee,
You have posted the wrong question.
It should read:
In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)
- (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
- (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) = 0
Now, if (r,s) is on the line defined by the equation y=3x+2, then (r,s) must satisfy the equation y=3x+2.
For example: We know that the point (5, 17) is on the line y=3x+2, because when we plug x=5 and y=17 into the equation, we get 17 = 3(5)+2 and the equation holds true.
So, we can reword the target question to be “Does s = 3r + 2?”
- (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (3r+2-s) = 0 or (4r+9-s) = 0
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
If (4r+9-s) = 0 then s = 4r+9, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT - (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (4r-6-s) = 0 or (3r+2-s) = 0
If (4r-6-s)) = 0 then s = 4r-6, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1&2 combined: Since (3r+2-s) is the only expression common to both statements, it must be true that 3r+2-s = 0, in which case y MUST equal 3r+2
As such the answer is C
If @, # and $ represent three different positive digits such that @+# = $, what is the value of # ?
- $=4
- @>1
Official Answer will be posted later.
Originally Posted by 800
If @, # and $ represent three different positive digits such that @+# = $, what is the value of # ?
- $=4
- @>1
Official Answer will be posted later.
Statement 1: $=4
Since @+# = $ and since the 3 digits are all different, statement 1 yields only two possible case:
case a) @=1, #=3, $=4
case b) @=3, #=1, $=4
Since # can equal either 1 or 3, statement 1 is INSUFFICIENT
Statement 2: @>1
No info about #, so statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Statements 1 & 2:
Statement 1 yields only 2 possibilities: a) @=1, #=3 and b) @=3, #=1
Statement 2 rules out case a)
This leaves us with only 1 possibility: @=3, #=1, so statements 1 & 2 combined are SUFFICIENT and the answer is C
Good post? |
Strange, at least for me.
A certain list consist of several different integers. Is the product of all integers in the list positive?
(1) The product of the greatest and smallest of the integers in the list is positive.
(2) There is an even number of integers in the list.
Good post? |
This is a nice question, that relies on our ability to find counter-examples in order to determine sufficiency.
Statement 1:
Given the conditions in statement 1, there are different sets of numbers that produce different answers to the target question.
If the product of the greatest and smallest of the integers in the list is positive, then here are two cases:
case a: the numbers are -3, -2, -1 in which case the product is negative
case b: the numbers are -3, -1 in which case the product is positive
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2:
Given the conditions in statement 2, here are two cases that produce different answers to the target question.
case a: the numbers are -3, 2 in which case the product is negative
case b: the numbers are -3, -2 in which case the product is positive
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 AND 2:
If the product of the greatest and smallest integers is positive, then there are two possible cases to consider:
case a: the largest and smallest integers are both positive, in which case all of the integers are positive, in which case their product MUST BE POSITIVE
case b: the largest and smallest numbers are both negative, in which case all of the numbers are negative. Now if all of the numbers are negative AND there is an even number of integers, then the product will still be positive.
Why? Well, we know that the product of any 2 negative integers will be positive. If there is an even number of negative integers, then we can pair up each negative integer with another negative integer to create a positive product. As such, the product of all of the negative integers MUST BE POSITIVE.
Since both cases yield the same answer to the target question (i.e., the product is positive), statements 1 & 2 combined ARE SUFFICIENT and the answer is C
Is x/3 + 3/x > 2?
(1) x < 3
(2) x > 1
Official Answer is
SPOILER: C
Why A should not be the answer?
as the equation comes to (x - 3)^2 > 0
Originally Posted by ranjeet_1975
Is x/3 + 3/x > 2?
(1) x < 3
(2) x > 1
Official Answer is
SPOILER: C
Why A should not be the answer?
as the equation comes to (x - 3)^2 > 0
Here’s my solution:
Statement 1
We can show this is insufficient through counter-example.
If x < 3, then:
a) x could equal 1, in which case x/3 + 3/x IS greater than 2
b) x could equal -1, in which case x/3 + 3/x IS NOT greater than 2
Since statement 1 yields 2 different answers to the target question, it is not sufficient
Statement 2
If x > 1, then x must be positive.
This is very useful, because if we know that x is positive, we can take our target question “Is x/3 + 3/x > 2?” and multiply both sides by 3x to get a new target question “ Is x^2 + 9 > 6x?”
If we take our new target question and subtract 6x from both sides, we get “Is x^2 - 6x + 9 > 0?
Finally, if we factor the left hand side, we get “Is (x - 3)^2 > 0?”
Well, (x - 3)^2 is almost always greater than zero. The only time it is not greater than zero is when x = 3.
As such, statement 2 is not sufficient.
Statements 1 & 2 combined
From statement 2, we reworded the target question as Is (x - 3)^2 > 0?
Statement 1 tell us that x cannot equal 3
This means that (x - 3)^2 must ALWAYS be greater than 0
As such, the two statements combined are sufficient, and the answer is
SPOILER: C
A certain dealership has a number of cars to be sold by its salespeople. How many cars are to be sold?
a) If each of the salespeople sales 4 of the cars, 23 cars will remain unsold.
b) If each of the salespeople sales 6 of the cars, 5 cars will remain unsold.
Good post? |
Ans C
I Total cars = 4n + 23
II Total cars = 6n + 5
Solving both we can find the total cars
If X>1 and Y>1, is X<1
Official Answer to follow soon
If you consider the statement 2 as not having the brackets,
you cannot arrive at the answer using statement 2 alone.
so consider stmt 1:
X^2 < (XY+X) ==> (X^2 - X) < XY ==> equation A consider stmt 2: XY/Y^2 - Y < 1 ==> XY/Y^2 < Y ==> XY < Y^3 ==> equation B
merge equation A and B
==> (X^2 - X) < XY < Y^3
==> X^2 - X < Y^3
since X and Y can take any values > 1, we cannot determine whether X < Y.
Hence both the statement together are not sufficient to answer this question.
Hope this helps !!!
Hi All,
Following is the question.
If x is negative, is x < -3 ?
- x^2 > 9
- x^3 < -9
SPOILER: Answer is A
Can anyone explain the answer ?
Originally Posted by aspire2011
Hi All,
If x < -3 then x^2 > 9. eg if x < -3, say x=-5 then x^2 = 25 satisfies x^2 > 9.
When x=-5, x^3=-25 x3 < -9 hence the correct answer should be ‘D’ (either statement is sufficient), but Official Guide answer is ‘A’ - any ideas why ?
Thanks in advance for your time.
A is the correct answer because.
x^2 >9 means x>3 or x<-3
Is square root (x-3)2 = 3-x?
- x is not equal to 3
- -x /x/ > 0
SPOILER: B
3.Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either pigs or cows. How many of the animals are cows?
- The farm has more than twice as many cows as it has pigs
- The farm has more than 12 pigs
SPOILER: C
- If x is an interger, is (x2 + 1)(x+5) an even number?
- x is an odd number
- Each prime factor x2 is greater than 7
SPOILER: D
B
C
D
1. It has been solved in another thread.
- P+C=2/3 of 60=40
option 1 says, C>2P => P+C>3P => 40>3P
So, P12, even this gives us many answer.
Combining, we get a unique solution as 13. So C is the answer.
- (x^2+1)(x+5)
if x is odd, both the factors will be even, hence the product will be even.
option 1 says, x is odd, sufficient to solve.
option 2 says, each prime factor of x^2 is greator than 7. All the factors of x^2 are factors of x.
So each prime factor of x>7, so there is no 2 as the prime factor, and all other prime nos are odd. If all the factors are odd, number x will be odd as well. Its sufficient.
So answer is D
- A manufacturer produced x percent more video cameras in 1994 than in 1993 and y percent more videos in 1995 than in 1994. if the manufacturer produced 1000 video cameras in 1993, how many video cameras did the manufacture produce in 1995?
- xy = 20
- x+y+xy/100 = 9.2
SPOILER: B - If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers, what is the value of d?
- 10d is a factor of f
- d>6
SPOILER: C - If the integers a and n are greater than 1 and the product of the first 8 positive integers is a multiple of an, what is the value of a?
- an = 64
- n = 6
SPOILER: B - Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5,000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force
- The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force
SPOILER: C
B
C
B
C
1:
1993 - 1000
1994 - (1+x/100)1000
1995 - (1+(x+y+xy/100)/100)1000
so, 2 helps us solve it, hence answer B
2.
f=30!
If we analyse 30! has factors(which can be a multiple of 10), 10 20 30
and 5 15 25 as we have enough multiples of 2 to make them 10.
so in total 10^7 is a factor of f
option 1 says 10^d is a factor of f, d can be 0,1,2…..7 => insufficient
option 2 alone is insufficient, but with 1, d>6, so d=7, so the answer is C
3.
8! is a multiple of a^n
if we analyse it, other than 2 all nos occur less than 6 times in the factorisation of 8! So n=6 gives us the answer.
option 1 says a^n=64, 2^6=64, 4^3=64 so its insufficient.
4.
My answer is E.
Actually I am stumped.
A person invested $5,000 for two years at a certain rate, compounded
annually. If he invested $5,000 again two years later, did the interest rate
increase?
1). After the first two years, the total amount became $5,800
2). To the nearest hundred, the amount of the interest for the second two years
is $500
SPOILER: imo c
Official Answer E
Good post? |
Originally Posted by marianha
A person invested $5,000 for two years at a certain rate, compounded
annually. If he invested $5,000 again two years later, did the interest rate
increase?
1). After the first two years, the total amount became $5,800
2). To the nearest hundred, the amount of the interest for the second two years
is $500
SPOILER: imo c
Official Answer E
i think it should be E because there is no data mentioned about the interval of compounding… not sure if there is some default assumption in such problems…
Good post? | What are these equations called? 1)If (Y+3)(Y-1)-(Y-2)(Y-1)=R(Y-1), what is the value of Y? (1) R^2=25 (2) R=5
Can someone explain how to solve this.
I tried solving it and i see that we dont need any of the statements to get the value of R.
Even after knowing the value of R,we cannot sove for Y.What do we call these type of equations?
Let us consider, G-day scenario,
St 1. is not enough. As sqrt deliver -/+ value. The UNIQUE value can not be obtained from st1. (A, D OUT)
St 2. by inserting value of R (R=5) from st 2. we get -
(Y+3)(Y-1) - (Y-2)(Y-1) = R(Y-1) => (Y^2 - Y + 3Y +3) - (Y^2 - Y - 2Y +2) = 5Y - 5 => Y^2 + 2Y + 3 - Y^2 + 3Y - 2 = 5Y - 5 => 5Y - 1= 5Y - 5 => 0 = -4
the equation does not exist. B out.
Combining st 1 and st 2 – no solution.
E is the pick.
Hi,
I need an answer and some clear explanation for this.
Is |x – 5| < 5?
(1) x < -4
(2) x < 4
Imo A.
1. ineq is false for x<4. So insuff.
So A.
y is not zero, is (2^x/y)^xy
2). y< 0
We have to prove whether (2^x/y)^x(2^)(x^2) < y^x
Since (2^)(x^2) >0, y^x >0
So from the two statements, we have to prove that y^x >0
1). x>y We can not conclude whether y<,= or > 0 INSUFFICIENT
2). y< 0 , we don’t know whether y^x y<,= or > 0 INSUFFICIENT
Because if x is odd (+ve or -ve number) then y^x 0,
Combining,
We don’t know whether x is odd or even number. INSUFFICIENT
Hence E.
Is ¦x - y¦>¦x - z¦?
(1) ¦y¦>¦z¦
(2) x < 0
provide explanation por favor, el señor..
Good post? | Imo E. Taking number line considering both stmts: z--x--0----------y x--y-----0--z
Need some help from you guys….
Can anyone please give me a “detailed step by step method” for solving this question? plzzzz no shortcuts etc. or IMO’s!
I am finding a lot of problems in solving equaltions like “(x-1)^20”
Question - Is |x - 1| less than 1 ?
1) . (x - 1)^2 less than and equal to 1
2) . x^2 - 1 greater than 0
I know the answer and I have some explanation also for the same from some source (either this forum or some other forum…not sure) BUT i m just not able to understand the LOGIC and FUNDA :-)
Official Answer’s after some posts!
Thanks for your replies….
I am not sure if the below answers r correct or not but this is what i have as “Official Answer’s” (source - got it from some other forum):-
Answer to 1st question: E
Answer to 2nd question: B (edited)
think the ANS is E.
Explanation :-
1) (x-1)^2 = 0
Insuff
2) x^2 - 1 > 0
x >1 or x
If m>0 and n>0 then is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n
1 m<0
C
Good post? |
m>0, n>0 is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n
st 1) m< 1 but x could be positve or negative and if x is negative, then i can get different numbers such that one of m+x is negative and n+x is positve nad the expression of LHS is negative which canot be greater than RHS. not sufficient st 2) x>0 .. as all expression are positive, we can multiple and reduce the equation to x *(n-m) > 0 x> 0 but we dont know if n-m > 0 not sufficent combing x>0, n-m > 0 .. sufficient
C
If x is positive is x>3
- (x-1)^2 > 4
- (x-2)^2 > 9
D
x > 0 , is x>3?? st 1) (x-1)^2 > 4 x-1 > 2(for other expression x will come as negative x > 3 sufficient st 2) (x-2)^2 > 9 x-2 > 3(for other expression x will come as negative x > 5 sufficient
D
If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?
(1) x > y + 4
(2) -5x
This is my approach..
3x > 7y to be proved…
given in 1: x > y+4 substitue this in the to be proved 3y+12 > 7y 12 > 4y 3 > y
ie y 7(2.9)
3x> 20.3
hence i concluded 3x min is 20.3 and 7y max is 20.3 hence A is sufficient
second statement
5x > 14y
divide by 2
2.5x > 7y
so 3x > 7y
Hence ‘D’ is the answer.
What is the value of the integer n?
(1) n(n + 2) = 15
(2) (n + 2)n = 15
C
Is n an integer
- N^2 is an integer
- Root of n is an integer
Good post? |
From st 1, n^2 = integer - does not confirm that n is an integer. For example, sqrt(2) is not an integer, BUT (sqrt(2))^2 is integer. SO, 1 is not sufficient. A,D out.
From st 2, sqrt(n)= integer. SO, n must be an integer. ENOUGH. B is the answer.
If 2^(-2k) < 16. What is the value of k?
1) k-12 is odd
2) k-12 is prime
from the q – if k is < -2 then that equation breaks.
- k-12 is odd then k can be any odd value.
- Prime numbers can never be negative. Since 2 (or 3 respectively) are the lowest prime numbers and k-12 is a prime number, k>=14. Along with -2 it gives a negative exponent ….if 2 is a prime, then k=14, if 3 is the first prime k=15. SUFFICIENT?