Data Quality & Research Design 2 Flashcards
Psychometrics regards two questions as paramount:
are the data reliable? are the data valid?
Generalizability
the degree to which a measurement can be obtained
under diverse circumstances, such as time, context, participant population,
etc.
◦ the degree to which you can apply the results of your study to a broader context
◦ Is the result you get with one test largely equivalent to the result you would get using a
different test?
Reliability: what it is and what affects it
The hallmark of reliability is consistency
* Measurement error means that the less error, the more reliable the
measurement.
At least four factors will affect measurement:
- Low precision
- The state of the participant
- The state of the experimenter
- The state of the environment
Reliability: how to improve it
At least four factors will enhance reliability:
1. Proofreading
2. Using a script
3. The person should match what is trying to be measured.
4. Aggregation
◦ Helps cancel out errors
Validity:
The degree to which a measurement measures
what it is supposed to
For a measure to be valid, it must be reliable
Constructs: Constructs cannot be directly
seen, but affect and help to explain things
that are visible
* Construct validation: Developing a group of
different measurements that yield more or
less the same result
Research Design: Case Method
Closely studying a particular event or person to find
out as much as possible
Advantages:
It describes the whole phenomenon—or the whole person—and
not just isolated variables
2. It can illuminate and maybe prevent future disasters
3. We need it to deal with particular individuals and events that
are not common
Disadvantage: Unknown generalizability
Experimental Study
Test differences between groups to determine if the difference is larger
than would be expected by chance
Independent variable
Imposed by the experimenter and is not affected by (and
therefore independent of ) any characteristic or behavior of the participants
Dependent variable (DV):
Assumed to be dependent on, or caused by, the independent
variable
Correlational Study:
Correlational method: A research technique
that establishes the relationship between two variables by
measuring both variables as they occur naturally in a sample of
participants
* There are no experimental groups
* Questionnaires are administered
Comparing & Contrasting
Experimental and Correlational Methods
Both attempt to assess the relationship between two variables
* The statistics (with two groups) are interchangeable
* The experimental method manipulates the presumed causal
variable, and the correlational method measures it.
* Reasons for not knowing causal direction in correlational
studies:
* Third-variable problem
* Unknown direction of cause (the directionality problem)
Experimental and Correlational Methods
Complications with experiments
◦ Uncertainty about what was really manipulated
A version of the third-variable problem
◦ Can create unlikely or impossible levels of a variable (sledgehammer manipulation)
◦ Often require deception (ethically precarious)
◦ Not always possible
* Takeaway:
* Experiments are not always better
* An ideal research program includes both designs