Data Analytic Techniques Flashcards

1
Q

ANOVA: which way?

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)
One way: 1 IV
Two-way: 2IV
Factorial: 2+ IVs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mixed-design ANOVA

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)

has at least one between-subjects and one within-subjects variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Main Effects

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)

The difference in the averages between groups, ignoring the other IVs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interaction Effects

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)
Requires Factorial design
The effect of one IV depends on the level of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mediator

A

a variable that explains the relationship between other variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Moderator

A

A variable that influences the strength of a relationship between other variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bivariate Regression

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)

To what degree can one quantitative variable predict the other?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Linear Regression

A

(Mertler & Vannatta 2013)

When both predictors and response variables are continuous and linear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Construct Validity

A

(Kazdin 2017)

the operationalization of the intervention/measure that is responsible for the effect found in the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CASE

A

(Kazdin 2017) Threats to construct validity
Cues of experimental situation
Attention and Contact with clients
Single operations and narrow stimulus sampling
Experimenter Expectancies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal Validity

A

(Kazdin 2017)

The extent to which the experimental manipulation, rather than extraneous factors, accounts for results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DIRT CHASMS

A

(Kazdin 2017) Threats to internal validity
Diffusion of treatment (similarity between interventions)
Instrumentation
Regression, statistical
Testing exposure
Combination of selection + other threats (e.g. groups are different in an important way)
History
Attrition
Selection bias
Maturation
Special Treatment/Reaction of Controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

External Validity

A

(Kazdin 2017) the extent to which results can be generalized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MRS TReNTS

A
(Kazdin 2017) Threats to external validity
Multiple-Treatment effect
Reactivity to experimental status
Sample Characteristics
Test Sensitization
Reactivity to assessment
Novelty Effects
Timing of Measurement
Stimulus Characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Standard Multiple Regression

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)
2 or more continuous IVs
1 continuous DV
All variables entered simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hierarchical Multiple Regression

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)
2 or more continuous IVs
1 continuous DV
Variable order is assigned

17
Q

Logistic Regression

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)
2 or more continuous IVs
1 categorical DV

18
Q

Path Analysis

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)

  • Similar to Multiple Regression
  • Tests models of causal relationships among variables
  • Does not prove causation
  • Includes only observed/measured variables
19
Q

Structural Equation Modeling

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)

Model testing including latent constructs and manifest variables

20
Q

Factor Analysis

A

(Costa & McCrae 1991)

Analyzes covariance and reduces to factors. Factors predict variables.

21
Q

Principle Components Analysis

A

(Grimm & Yarnold 1995)

Mathematical reduction of variance - aggregates variables

22
Q

Statistical Conclusion Validity

A

(Shadish, Cook & Campbell 2002) Threats: Monday Law and order SVU

  • Multiple comparisons and error rate
  • Low statistical power
  • Subject heterogeneity
  • Variability in procedures
  • Unreliability of the measures