damages for distress and loss of enjoyment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What about damages for distress and loss of enjoyment?

A

In commercial transactions there will be little or no prospect of recovery of damages for distress/injured feelings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was held in the case of Hayes v James & Dodd 1990?

A

The CA awarded the expenditure incurred. However, it rejected the claim for anguish and vexation because it was a purely commercial contract. (Blocked garage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What about in relation to a holiday?

A

. If the holiday goes wrong as a result of a breach then the claimant is entitled to damages representing the disappointment experienced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was held in the case of Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] ?

A

Claimant was awarded half the money back - extra damages claimed as loss of enjoyment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was held in the case of Watts v Morrow by Bingham LJ?

A

A contract-breaker is not in general liable for any emotional response. The rule is not absolute. Rule is founded on the considerations of policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is it called when an award reflects the claimants consumer surplus value?

A

This is the value a consumer places on something which is in excess of the market value – like enjoyment of a holiday - subjective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in the case of Farley v Skinner?

A

Peace and tranquility is an important object. In the CA it was held that the award was contrary to principle because enjoyment / peace of mind could not be the ‘very object of the contract’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly