D3 Exam Questions Flashcards
Download exam papers here:https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VG4daNUn-aByEC6hHk7jZumoioMLyQeK?usp=sharing
1
- Supplier 3 is described as a small firm or enterprise.*
- *(a) Explain THREE advantages that BS might obtain by sourcing the mountain bikes from a small firm such as Supplier 3.**
(10 marks)
January 2014
p.65 2.6
- Access to a wider/inclusive market that is not merely confined to large suppliers
- Potentially lower prices due to lower overheads associated with smaller organisations;
- Shorter decision making channels due to absence of bureaucracy;
- Greater flexibility and responsiveness especially in small order situations;
- Greater commitment as BS is likely to be a core customer;
- Small suppliers are usually local (as Supplier 3 is) with shorter supply chain advantages in transport/logistics and communication; etc.
1
Supplier 3 is described as a small firm or enterprise.
(b) Explain TWO disadvantages that BS might encounter by sourcing the mountain bikes from a small firm such as Supplier 3.
(10 marks)
January 2014
p.65 2.5
- Lack of expertise to understand or interpret complex requirements
- Lack of capacity for larger order volume contracts where the trend is toward aggregate of demand into fewer larger contracts, the use of framework agreements and a reduced supplier base
- Financial instability which might compromise supplier performance or debase the contractual terms on payment (chasing early payment), quality(cutting corners), lead times (stock outs), etc;
- Lack of economies of scale hence higher costs/prices;
- Perceptions and attitudes that are averse to structured business approach employed by the company –e.g. tendering processes, credit terms, etc;
- Lack of expertise, time or resources for marketing, research and development to ensure future supply continuity
p.2 1.3
It is a pre-contract procurement process that is concerned with ‘how and where the products or services are obtained’; the process of identifying, selecting and developing suppliers; etc.
It can be carried out at 2 basic levels: (a) tactical and (b) strategic
Tactical sourcing would be:
- Lower level decisions relating to low profit, low risk and routine items.
- Also includes short-range decisions as to how specific supply requirements will be met in response to changing or temporary conditions in the organisation or supply market
- Clearly defined requirements and specifications and transactional sourcing decisions based mainly on open bidding and purchase prices.
Strategic sourcing processes are concerned with:
- Top level, longer terms decisions relating to items with high profit and high supply risk
- The formulation of long range decisions about procurement policies, the supplier base, supply chain relationships, the purchase of capital equipment and ethical sustainability issues
- Developing a deep understanding of requirements (eg using value analysis) and of the supply market and individual supplier drivers and capabilities
1
b) Describe FOUR stages of the sourcing process that might be used by LOCOG.
(4 marks)
March 2014
p.3. 2.1
- Identification of the requirement or need – the specification, the quantities, whether a new requirement or a rebuy/replenishment, etc.; This may take the form of a purchase requisition from a department or a stock replenishment from inventory control or a requirement definition due to ESI or EBI involvement in the design process. Could also be due to re-evaluation of needs and the definition of requirements in product and service specifications
- A sourcing plan – This would include make/do or buy decisions and a definition of the type of purchase ie new, re-buy or modified re-buy. The buying team would refer to the existing sourcing policy or determine the sourcing strategy or methodology to apply - e.g. single or multiple sourcing; whether to use competitive tendering or direct negotiation; whether to source locally or internationally; establishing the award criteria, contractual requirements and processes; etc.
- Market analysis- this would involve analysing demand and market patterns; identifying new potential suppliers; general risk assessment by evaluating the business environmental factors.
- The identification and/or pre-qualification of suppliers – using available sources of data on supply sources (existing and potential suppliers); applying key criteria (technical, financial, commercial, etc) to pre-screen and determine suitable suppliers who meet LOCOG’s standards; engage the identified supplier using appropriate tools such as PQQ or RFI, RFQ or ITT, depending on the sourcing process or methodology adopted. Some answers divided this stage into two – identification and pre-qualification – and marks were earned appropriate to the depth of detail presented.
- Evaluating supply offers /options – depending on the methodology adapted, LOCOG would receive (from pre-qualified suppliers) quotations or tenders/bids for evaluation against the established criteria and /or enter into negotiations with one or more of the suppliers. The ‘winning’ supplier would be the one offering the best value solution to the requirement – candidates with public sector background seemed to favour the term ‘MEAT’ (Most Economically Advantageous Tender).
- Creating contractual relationship – this would be the final stage of the process when all clarifications have been made a purchase order/contract/framework agreement or other method of legal relationship is formulated and adopted by both parties.
1
(b) Discuss whether competitive tendering would be an appropriate method of awarding the contract to one of the international suppliers of liquid monomer
(8 marks)
Jan 2015
View Exam Paper with Case Study
Similar question 15/01, 18/11
page 32 table 2.2
Competitive tendering might achieve the lowest price for the company however, this method is subject to such conditions as:
- The value of the procurement should be high enough to justify the expense of the tendering process
- The specifications must be clear and potential suppliers must have a clear idea of the costs involved in fulfilling the contract
- There must be sufficient suppliers in the market to ensure that there is competition
- The potential suppliers must be both technically qualified and keen to win the business
- There must be sufficient time available for the competitive tendering process to be carried out
Competitive tendering is not a suitable method in situations where:
- It is impossible to estimate production costs accurately
- Price is not the only or most important criterion in the award of hte contract
- Changes to the specification are likely as the contract progresses
- Special tooling or set up costs are major factors in the requirement
1
(a) Explain FOUR objectives that Vasseem should aim to achieve, if he decides to negotiate directly with the two international suppliers of liquid monomer.
(12 marks)
Jan 2015
page 31 2.10
- Obtain a fair and reasonable (or advantageous) price for the quantity of goods specified
- To get the supplier to perform the contract on time
- To exert some control over the manner in which the contract is performed
- To persuade the supplier to give maximum co-operation to the buyer’s company
- To develop a sound and continuing relationship with competent suppliers
The case study states that Francois believes that the Ministry should have developed a collaborative partnership approach to sourcing with the three suppliers of the IT equipment.
Outline FIVE benefits for the Ministry of developing this type of approach.
(20 marks)
March 2015
p. 29 table 2.1
- Greater stability of supply and supply prices
- Sharing of risk and investment
- Better supplier motivation and responsiveness, arising from mutual commitment and reciprocity
- Cost savings from reduced supplier base, collaborative cost reduction
- Access to supplier’s technology and expertise
- Joint planning and information sharing, sharing supporting capacity planning and efficiency
- Ability to plan long-term improvements
- More attention to relationship management eg access to an account manager
1
A report entitled ‘Review of Efficiency in the Schools System’ published in 2013 found that too many schools continue to purchase products and services individually.
Describe THREE advantages and TWO disadvantages of schools adopting a consortium or group buying approach to sourcing their requirements from suppliers.
(20 marks)
May 2015
p.42 4.26
ADVANTAGES
- By means of enhanced bargaining power, the consortium can obtain discounts that would not be available to individual members - although there may be difficulties in allocating such discounts fairly among them
- A consortium can establish framework agreements, simplifying purchase administration for members. This can lead to significant reductions in transaction and contracting costs, especially in the case of low-value items where the admin cost is disproportionate to the purchase price of the items.
- Consortium members can pool expertise, knowledge and contacts, where these would be beneficial for particular procurement categories or exercises
p.42 4.27
DISADVANTAGES
- There are costs and effort associated with communication and coordination, staff development and policy development
- There is an issue of transparency between consortium members. Buyers need full information about plans, processes, designs and costs in order to make informed procurement decisions: this may expose some members of a consortium to commercial or intellectual property risk
- Consortia may suffer from lengthy negotiation and decision processes, which are inefficient and may deter some suppliers from dealing with the consortium
- Members are not obliged to purchase to the agreed specification
- Very large consortia may fall foul of laws and regulations designed to prevent dominant marker players from abusing their dominant market position (eg by dictating pricing)
1
Discuss FOUR criteria that GFATM might apply when awarding the contracts to suppliers.
(20 marks)
July 2015
p.57
- Ability to conform to specification
- Reasons for disqualification
- Lowest Price
- Best value or ‘most economically advantageous tender’ (MEAT)
- Best value and total lifecycle cost
1
b) ESA has three prime contractors, Airbus, Thales Alenia Space and OHB. Below these first tier suppliers are lower tier suppliers, who are specialists in engines and flight systems.
Outline THREE benefits for ESA’s procurement function of adopting a supplier tiering approach to sourcing. (12 marks)
Jan 2016
p.74 4.14
- There will be fewer commercial relationships to source and manage and develop instead of having to deal with a large number of suppliers.
- To maintain quality, service and minimise business and reputational risk. However, ESA’s procurement should ‘drill down’ through the tiers - appraising and monitoring policies, systems and performance – thus ensuring sound management of the entire supply chain.
- ESA may influence first tier suppliers to adopt some of its own suppliers as subcontractors or lower tier suppliers. This will ensure continuity of its own business relationships established in previous contracts where such suppliers demonstrated excellence.
- ESA’s procurement function will have fewer tasks and have time to pursue a more strategic focus on issues like sustainable sourcing, global sourcing, relationship development, etc.
- Collaborative partnership with tier 1 suppliers will enable ESA to benefit from their expertise and innovation which is important in ESA’s kind of enterprise
- It may lead to variety reduction and standardisation of parts and components. This will result in cost savings in handling and storage.
1
a) Explain the term ‘supplier tiering’ in the context of the case study.
(8 marks)
Jan 2016
p. 73 4.8
Tiering suppliers is a form of supply base management in which suppliers are organised such that only first tier suppliers deal directly with the buying organisation. Second tier suppliers will participate in the same supply chain, but will supply first tier suppliers who will assemble or integrate before supplying the buying organisation. The practice originated in the automotive industry and allowed car assemblers to reduce their first tier supply base to below 1000 suppliers. The practice allows the development of differentiated supply relationships with a smaller community of suppliers. Management contracting is a similar practice in the building and construction sector.
In terms of the case study, ESA is a big organisation with a large number of suppliers. It prefers to deal directly with only a small number of these suppliers, these are first tier suppliers. These tier 1 suppliers are given the responsibility of dealing with and managing the other suppliers, the second tier suppliers.
ESA may have a supply chain with thousands of different suppliers in many different countries. Rather than dealing directly with all of these, it might reduce its vendor base to a few hundred first tier suppliers, who in turn will deal with and manage a second tier and potentially third tier or further tiers of suppliers along the supply chain.
1
(a) Describe FIVE sources of information that could be used by WEL’s procurement team for the appraisal of potential suppliers
(10 marks)
Nov 2016
p. 7 3.2
- The buyer’s own database of existing and past suppliers, including records of their offerings, performance evaluations and so on. This can be supplement by the buyer’s lists of preferred, approved or authorised suppliers, indicating which suppliers have been pre-qualified for use
- Formal requests for information (RFI), often using pre-prepared questionnaires sent to suppliers who might be of interest
- The marketing communications of potential suppliers: advertising, direct mail, brochures and catalogues, visits from sales reps, websites, etc.
- Internet search for websites including business directories and listings, searchable databases designed to promoted exports and specialist purchasing resources
- Online market exchanges, auction sites and supplier/buyer forums, which may also allow the posting of requests for quotation and other exchanges
- Published listings of suppliers and stockists: general directories (eg Yellow Pages) and specialist trade/industry directories and registers
- Trade/Industry Press (newspapers, magazines, journals and bulletins) and specialist procurement journals (ie Supply Management or Procurement Professional)
- Trade fairs, Exhibitions and conferences
1
- The case states that WEL’s procurement manager is considering the possibility of entering into partnerships with selected suppliers in order to gain greater benefits.*
(i) Outline THREE advantages of supplier partnering from the buyer’s viewpoint.
(5 marks)
Nov 2016
p. 29 table 2.1
- Greater stability of supply and supply prices
- Sharing of risk and investment
- Better supplier motivation and responsiveness, arising from mutual commitment and reciprocity
- Cost savings from reduced supplier base, collaborative cost reduction
- Access to supplier’s technology and expertise
- Joint planning and information sharing, sharing supporting capacity planning and efficiency
- Ability to plan long-term improvements
- More attention to relationship management eg access to an account manager
1
- The case states that WEL’s procurement manager is considering the possibility of entering into partnerships with selected suppliers in order to gain greater benefits.*
(ii) Outline TWO disadvantages of supplier partnering from the buyer’s viewpoint.
(5 marks)
Nov 2016
p. 29 table 2.1
- Risk of complacency re cost/quality
- Less flexibility to change suppliers at need
- Possible risk to confidentiality, intellectual property (eg if supplies also supply competitors)
- May be locked into relationship with an incompatible or inflexible supplier
- Restricted in EU Public Sector Procurement Directives
- May be locked into relationship, despite supply market changes and opportunities
- Costs of relationship management
- Mutual dependency may create loss of flexibility and control
1
(a) Explain how EML could use the elements of a procurement positioning matrix, such as the Kraljic matrix, to assist its sourcing process. (12 marks)
Jan 2017
p. 5 2.11
Kraljic identifies four types of requirements/items based on value (importance) and supply risk (complexity) effects on the procurement strategy of an organisation as follows:
Non-critical or routine items: are low value/low risk e.g. stationery, which should be processed via low- maintenance sourcing routines such as vendor-managed inventory, blanket ordering and e-procurement.
Leverage items: are high value /low risk where EML should use its buying power to secure best prices and terms by using standardisation, competitive bidding and multi-sourcing/supplier switching.
Bottleneck items: the priority for these high risk/low value items is supply security which is achievable via negotiation, long term contracts, multi-sourcing (back-up contracts), incentives/penalties; and safety stock.
Strategic items: such as major pieces of machinery are high value/high risk. EML should pursue long term collaborative partnership - mutual dependency and investment, total cost focus, etc. The sourcing process
will need to be rigorous to develop and maintain the ‘right’ supply chain partners.
1
(b) Suggest FOUR examples of information about existing suppliers that might be found on the EML supplier database and used as part of EML’s supplier pre-qualification process.
(8 marks)
Jan 2017
p.8 table 1.1
Pieces of information about existing suppliers might include the following:
- Contact details – this would show whether the supplier was international or domestic
- Terms and conditions of trade including prices and preferred currency
- Approved or preferred status of the supplier
- Average value and frequency of spend with each supplier
- Special capabilities (e.g. late customisation capability) suggesting selection when special needs arise
- Results of supplier appraisals, audits and ratings
- Vendor performance history (quality, lead times, delivery, compliance, etc.)
- Current systems such as framework agreements and/or call-off contracts in place
- Financial stability of the supplier
1
(b) Describe THREE possible ways in which Steven might involve NEPC’s stakeholders in the sourcing process. (12 marks)
March 2017
p. 9 3.13
- Early buyer involvement (EBI) - buyers are important in providing commercial input to bring the overall success in the product development and supply sustainability.
- A formal committee or a team approach –the preparation of a specification involves reconciliation of conflicting objectives. A committee/team (cross-functional/multi-skilled) is formed comprising members from each stakeholder group –e.g. design, quality, procurement, etc.
- Informal approach –encourage stakeholders to consider both commercial and technical factors affecting their activities; buyers should to challenge the assumptions of users and to suggest alternative methods or solutions; designers and users should seek advice and input before going too far with their initiatives.
- A purchasing co-ordinator approach –this is a formalisation of the informal approach, with procurement staff appointed as ‘liaison officers’ to co-ordinate the required communication.
- An early supplier involvement (ESI) -suppliers are involved at an early stage in the product or service development –thus taking advantage of their technical expertise to improve on the design and costs. – suppliers have tremendous expertise in connection with operational methods, EOQs, substitutes, lead times, packaging, supply sustainability, etc. As Steven lacks public sector experience he will greatly benefit from involving suppliers early in his plans.
- Other appropriate ways - e.g. consultation, focus groups and surveys.
1
(a) Briefly describe FOUR stakeholders that Steven might engage with, as part of NEPC’s sourcing process. (8 marks)
March 2017
p. 9 3.12
a) Stakeholders in NEPC that Steven might engage with as part of the sourcing process might include:
- Users of the items being sourced – e.g. consultants, doctors and nurses, who have a clear understanding of the desired functionality of the required items.
- Finance department, to advise on budgetary concerns especially in capex situations where specialist investment appraisal techniques are required.
- Design function members will be important in contributing to the preparation of the product or service specification
- Suppliers, are likely to have the expertise to contribute to design and specification, sustainability plans and costs
- The quality management team, which will be able to ensure that items being sourced are fit for purpose
- Any other relevant internal or external stakeholders - e.g. the management boards of the NHS Trusts themselves.
1
a) Explain the nature of ‘strategic’ purchases and their likely impacts on CHL’s sourcing process. (10 marks)
May 2017
p. 3
a) ‘Strategic’ items are highly important and their supply market is characterised by scarcity and high complexity. The items are usually of high value and used over a long time.
The impact of such items on the sourcing process might include:
- The likelihood of mutual dependency and investment between the company and the supplier.
- The focus should be on total cost, supply security and competitiveness.
- The need to develop long-term, trust-based, mutually beneficial relationships.
- A rigorous sourcing process involving top management and the wider stakeholder interest in order to ensure sustainable long-term relationships.
The sourcing process will be rigorous – with stakeholder
involvement, wide market research including international sources, supplier prequalification, etc. – to find a supplier who can satisfy CHL’s need for installation, service and maintenance.
Include some procurement positioning concepts such as Kraljic matrix,
1
b) Explain the term ‘supplier pre-qualification’ and how it might assist CHL’s sourcing process.
May 2017
p. 11 4.2
Supplier pre-qualification’ is the definition and assessment of criteria for supplier suitability.
- The development of objective evaluation criteria by which suppliers’ suitability will be appraised.
- The screening of potential suppliers against the defined criteria via a PQQ, RFI, etc.
- Pre-qualification may assist sourcing process by saving time and effort or cost as follows:
- Only suppliers meeting the minimum standard/criteria are invited to participate in a sourcing process.
- It facilitates the preparation of an approved supplier list.
- It will be suitable for a specialised type of requirement being considered by CHL.
- It is carried out to pre-screen suppliers to receive an invitation to tender or to quote for a contract.
- It will help to embed qualitative selection criteria in the supplier selection process.
Q1 The case study information states that ZSL’s new approach to sourcing is to use several suppliers, or multiple sourcing.
(b) Describe TWO disadvantages to ZSL of a multiple sourcing approach, compared to single sourcing. (8 marks)
July 2017
p.26 1.7
- They can lead to unnecessarily high procurement costs.A large supplier base means more small orders and higher transaction and admin costs: giving large orders to fewer suppliers, on the other hand, would secure volume discounts and other savings( eg through systems integration with key suppliers)
- They fail to exploit the value adding and competitive potential of concentrating on more collaborative relationships with fewer suppliers (eg continuous improvement over time, co-investment in innovation and quality, better communication and integration and so on)
- They can lead to waste, by retaining suppliers who cannot ( or can no longer) meet the firms’ requirements, or are otherwise not often used - and perhaps by increasing stock variety and proliferation, where different suppliers have slightly different products (so that ordering from multiple suppliers works against standardisation, variety reduction and inventory reduction)
1
The case study information states that ZSL’s new approach to sourcing is to use several suppliers, or multiple sourcing.
(a) Describe THREE advantages to ZSL of a multiple sourcing approach, compared to single sourcing. (12 marks)
Jul 2017
p.26
- If there is a supply shortage or disruption (because of political unrest or bad weather in one supplier’s area) or unforeseen peaks in demand (creating a need for extra supply), or a supplier failure, the organisation has established relationships with a wide range of approved alternative suppliers
- As circumstances change - for both buyer and supplier - suppliers may become more or less compatible with the buying organisation, and mor or less competitive in terms of their offering. Increasing the rage of pre-qualified potential suppliers enables the buyer to be more opportunistic: taking advantage of the best available price, trading terms, quality, innovation and flexibility on offer at any given time.
- It is likely to keep the supplier base competitive, as each supplier knows that it is competing for contracts with a number of other sources of supply.
1
(a) Explain with the aid of a suitable diagram the term ‘supplier tiering’.
(5 marks)
November 2017, Jan 2016
p.73

1
(b) Explain THREE possible consequences for PBL if it decides to ‘tier’ its supply chain.
(15 marks)
November 2017
(Similar questions Jan 2016)
p.74 4.14
- There will be fewer commercial relationships to source and manage and develop instead of having to deal with a large number of suppliers.
- To maintain quality, service and minimise business and reputational risk. However, the procurement team should ‘drill down’ through the tiers - appraising and monitoring policies, systems and performance – thus ensuring sound management of the entire supply chain.
- The company may influence first tier suppliers to adopt some of its own suppliers as subcontractors or lower tier suppliers. This will ensure continuity of its own business relationships established in previous contracts where such suppliers demonstrated excellence.
- The procurement function will have fewer tasks and have time to pursue a more strategic focus on issues like sustainable sourcing, global sourcing, relationship development, etc.
- Collaborative partnership with tier 1 suppliers will enable the company to benefit from their expertise and innovation which is important in the company’s kind of enterprise
- It may lead to variety reduction and standardisation of parts and components. This will result in cost savings in handling and storage.