Cummins CAT Flashcards

1
Q

CAT Bonds vs High Layer Reinsurance

A

Cover high layers of reinsurance protection
-Credit risk of reinsurers
-High reinsurance margins

Solve by:
Fully collateralized (no credit risk)
Events not highly correlated with investment returns=Spreads lower on CAT bonds than reinsurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Single Purpose Reinsurer Benefits

A

Good for Insurers:
Considered licensed reinsurer so still get tax/accounting benefits

Good for Investors:
-Isolate investment risk to pure CAT risk (no business risk)
-Bonds fully collateralized (no credit risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of CAT Bond Triggers

A
  1. Indemnity (Size of insurer loss)
  2. Index
    -Industry Loss (industry loss exceeds threshold)
    -Modeled Loss (modeled loss exceeds threshold)
    -Parametric (e.g. wind speed)
  3. Hybrid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pros and Cons of Indemnity Triggers

A

Pro (insurer): Minimizes basis risk

Con (insurer): Require disclosure of confidential info on policy portfolio

Con (investor): Must obtain info on insurer’s UW portfolio, difficult for complex risks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pros and Cons of Index Triggers

A

Pro (investor): Minimize moral hazard
Pro (insurer): Indices more quickly measurable

Con (insurer): Basis risk, can be reduced with more narrowly defined geo indices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sidecar

A

Designed to increase capacity for reinsurers

Enable reinsurer to move some risk off balance sheet (improves leverage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Catastrophic Equity Puts

A

Not asset-backed
When CAT occurs, stock price falls, raise capital with put option

Pros: Lower transaction costs since no SPR

Cons:
-Not collateralized
-Issuing stock may dilute existing shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Catastrophic Risk Swap

A

e.g reinsurers swap CA EQ and Japan flood risks

Pros:
-Diversification (smaller capital requirement)
-Low transaction costs

Cons:
-Parity when both expected losses equal
-Basis risk
-Not collateralized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Industry Loss Warranties

A

Insurer losses AND industry losses trigger
Payout binary or pro-rata

Pros:
-More likely treated as reinsurance for regulatory purposes than CAT bond
-Plug gaps in reinsurance programs
-Efficient use of funds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LIBOR

A

Floating interest paid to investors

Swapped with fixed return on trust to immunize both parties from interest rate risk and default risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rate on Line and Loss on Line

A

ROL = Reins Prem / Policy Limit
LOL = Expected Loss / Policy Limit

Ratio of ROL to LOL on trad reinsurance compared to ratio of yields on CAT bonds show bonds not expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Other issues around CAT bonds

A

Regulatory:
-Often issued offshore, but low cost and high expertise
-No hurdles as long as triggers highly correlated with insurer losses

Tax:
-For investors, income falls under dividends instead of interest

Dissemination of Info:
-Privately placed (no public market) info not openly shared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly