Cultural variations in attachment Flashcards
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - procedure
Meta analysis of studies from different cultures using the strange situation
32 studies
8 countries
2000 children
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - findings and conclusion
Secure attachment
Highest in Great Britain - 75%
Lowest in China - 50%
Similar across cultures
Always the most common type of attachment
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - findings and conclusion
Insecure-avoidant attachment
Highest in West Germany - 35%
Lowest in Japan - 5.2%
In West Germany, infants are encouraged to be independent from their mothers
Suggests there are cultural differences in this attachment type
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - findings and conclusion
Insecure-resistant attachment
Highest in Japan - 28.8%
Lowest in Great Britain - 2.8%
Japanese encourage infants to depend on their mother and create “amae” which is a sense of oneness which they believe is natural
Suggests there are cultural differences in this attachment type
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - conclusion
Overall, attachment types were similar in different cultures
Suggests attachment is an innate process and it is not greatly affected by cultural differences
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - evaluation
High population validity - all cultures included
Researcher bias - chose the studies used
Grossman and Grossman - procedure
Replicated the strange situation with 49 German families of a range of social classes
Grossman and Grossman - findings
Infants either avoidant or secure
Very few were resistant
Grossman and Grossman - conclusion
Cultural differences in attachment type
Could be caused by German cultural norms or parents keeping some interpersonal distance from the infant
Grossman and Grossman - evaluation
High population validity - range of social classes
Control of extraneous variables
Takahashi - procedure
Replicated the strange situation with 60 middle class Japanese infants
Takahashi - findings
68% secure
32% resistant
0% avoidant
90% of studies stopped early due to infants extreme distress during separation anxiety
Takahashi - conclusion
Similar to USA in terms of secure attachment
Higher resistant attachments because in Japanese cultures babies spend most of their time with their mother
Takahashi - evaluation
Low population validity - only middle class infants tested Ethical issues - caused the majority of infants extreme distress Reliable - strange situation method has high control
Evaluation point - the effects of mass media
Different cultures watch American TV
So all cultures will see American attachment types and parenting books on television
Will copy it - so all cultures share attachment styles?
Therefore, attachment types are due to nurture not nature