Cultural Variations in Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

Imposed Etic

A

Attempting to apply a theory or technique designed for one culture to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ethnocentrism

A

When the norms of one culture are seen as superior to other cultures because they are the majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did Ainsworth’s research demonstrate ethnocentrism?

A

Ainsworth concluded that ‘secure’ is the most ideal type of attachment for infants. This implied that Western parenting styles are superior to others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meta-Analysis

A

A research technique that involves analyzing multiple studies, all focused on the same area of research, and drawing one, overall conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - Aim

A

To review studies of attachment conducted in different countries and consider what cross-cultural differences there were, and particularly to consider the consistency of secure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - Procedure

A

Conducted a meta-analysis of studies that focused on mother-infant interaction that used the Strange Situation procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - Findings

A

Across eight countries, about 65% of infants were secure, 21% insecure-avoidant, 14% insecure-resistant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - Conclusion

A

Parenting styles and values differ between cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What have studies found about aboriginal infants?

A

Aboriginal infants are nine times more likely to be placed into care, and make up 25% of the Australian care system. Shows how ethnocentrism can have negative effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sagi (2001) - Summary

A

Suggested that in Israel, children are reared communally in a Kibbutz, meaning they’re less reliant on one attachment figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rothbaum (2000) - Summary

A

Explains that USA are socially and emotionally competent that can regulate their own emotions and are typically secure, whereas Japanese inhibit their emotions and are group-focused rather than self-orientated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grossman (1991) - Summary

A

Explains how Germans raise children to maintain interpersonal distance, encourage independence and wean children off physical contact from an early age. This is why German infants tend to be insecure-avoidant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Takahashi (1990) - Aim

A

To determine if different cultures have different parenting/attachment styles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Takahashi (1990) - Procedure

A

Replicated the Strange Situation with 60 middle-class Japanese infants and mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Takahashi (1990) - Findings

A

0% were insecure-avoidant, 32% insecure-resistant, 68% secure. 90% of the episodes where infants were alone had to be stopped due to excessive infant anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Jin et al. (2012) - Aim

A

To compare the proportions of attachment types in Korea to other studies.

17
Q

Jin et al. (2012) - Procedure

A

Replicated the Strange Situation with 87 Korean infants.

18
Q

Jin et al. (2012) - Findings

A

1% were insecure-avoidant, 21% insecure-resistant, 78% secure.

19
Q

Simonella et al. (2004) - Aim

A

To investigate whether attachment types in Italian infants reflect those identified in earlier studies.

20
Q

Simonella et al. (2004) - Procedure

A

76 infants aged 12 months were assessed using the Strange Situation to determine their attachment type. Comparisons were made with existing studies.

21
Q

Simonella et al. (2004) - Findings

A

50% were secure, 36% insecure-avoidant, 14% insecure-resistant.

22
Q

Simonella et al. (2004) - Conclusion

A

An increase in mothers who go back to work and utilize childcare is potentially a reason for a lower percentage of securely attached infants. Cultural differences can have a significant influence on the patterns of secure and insecure attachment types.

23
Q

Strengths of Cultural Variations

A
  • Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis only included studies with mothers, and the Strange Situatuon procedure, giving reliable findings.
  • Very large sample assessed by Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (nearly 2000 infants and mothers), increasing internal validity and reducing anomalous results.
  • Good generalisability as findings show that secure attachment is universal, supporting the view that attachment is innate and biological.
24
Q

Limitations of Cultural Variations

A
  • Findings cannot be generalised to father-infant variations.
  • Unrepresentative sample of different cultures, studied different cultures, not countries.
  • Sagi (2001) found attachment types in Tokyo were similar to Western studies, while rural Japan was more resistant - evidence for sub-cultures.
  • Methods to measure attachment may not be applicable to other cultures, as they were designed for one.