cultural variations in attachment Flashcards
define cultural variations
the differences in norms and values that exist between people in different groups
what was the aim of Van Ijzendoorn’s study
to look at the proportions of secure, insecure avoidant, insecure resistant attachment across countries to assess cultural variation
state the number of participants in Van Ijzendoorn’s study
1900 children from 8 countries involved in 32 studies of attachment
what was the procedure of Van Ijzendoorn’s study
reviewed the 32 studies and meta analysed the results
(results of each study were combined and analysed with each study giving a weighting depending on sample size)
what were the results of Van Ijzendoorn’s study
secure attachment was the most common attachment type
50% in China
75% in Great Britain
insecure avoidant was most common in Germany
insecure resistant was most common in Israel
individualist countries were simil.ar to ainsworth’s study for insecure resistant attachments (14%) but collectivist cultures (china, japan, israel) were above 25%
in Van Ijzendoorn’s study where was variation greatest
within cultures
In the USA one study showed 46% secure attachments but another showed 90%
who did the study on cultural variations in Italy
Simonelli
what was the aim of Simonelli’s study
whether the proportion of babies if different attachment types matches those from previous studies
how many participants did Simonelli’s study use and how old were they
76 babies aged 12 months
what was the procedure of Simonelli’s study
strange situation
what were the results of Simonelli’s study
50% secure
36% insecure avoidant
lower rate of S and higher rate of IA had been found previously
what was the conclusion of Simonelli’s study
due to cultural change with mothers going back to work, working long hours, and therefore using childcare
who did the study on cultural variations in Korea
Mi Kyoung Jin et al
what was the aim of Mi Kyoung Jin et al study
to compare attachments in Korea to other studies
how many participants were there in Mi Kyoung Jin et al study
87 babies unsure of age