Cultural Variations in Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kronenburg do In 1988?

A

They conducted a meta-analysis of 32. studies using 8 countries and they investigated the patterns of attachment across a variety. of cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What country had the most secure attachments?

A

UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What country had the least secure attachments?

A

China

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What country had the most avoidant attachments?

A

Germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What country had the least avoidant attachments?

A

Japan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What country had the most resistant attachments?

A

Israel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What country had the least resistant attachments?

A

UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain Simonellas work

A

She demonstrated the proportion of securely attached children in Italy was only 50%which was lower then. expected. Researchers suggested thatches changes are due to a changing. culture and social expectations of mothers, as they are working. more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Jin et al do in 2012?

A

He found that the when the strange situation was used to assess 87 Korean infants aged 6 months, the vast majority of insecurity attached children were actually classed as insecure resistant opposed to avoidant. This pattern is similar to Japan suggesting similarities in child-rearing practices are influential in establishing patterns of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give a - (LEV)

A

Lacks ecological validity as it didn’t measure what it. was meant to. However, multiple. different attachments exist. within the same country which wasn’t acknowledged. This suggests Ijzendoorn and Kronburg didn’t account for such differences and so are more likely to be studying differences between countries of attachment patterns, rather than culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give a - (SSCB)

A

Strange situation is culture bound sample was biased so the findings are unlikely to be generalised to other cultures. This is an example of imposed metic because Ainsworth. assumed that the. stages of attachment she developed could be universally applied to all children from all cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give a + (RBLS)

A

Reliable findings because of large samples used. This replicability increases the validity and faith in conclusions because it decreases the likelihood that. the observed results were one off or due to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly