Cultural Variations in Attachment Flashcards
What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kronenburg do In 1988?
They conducted a meta-analysis of 32. studies using 8 countries and they investigated the patterns of attachment across a variety. of cultures
What country had the most secure attachments?
UK
What country had the least secure attachments?
China
What country had the most avoidant attachments?
Germany
What country had the least avoidant attachments?
Japan
What country had the most resistant attachments?
Israel
What country had the least resistant attachments?
UK
Explain Simonellas work
She demonstrated the proportion of securely attached children in Italy was only 50%which was lower then. expected. Researchers suggested thatches changes are due to a changing. culture and social expectations of mothers, as they are working. more
What did Jin et al do in 2012?
He found that the when the strange situation was used to assess 87 Korean infants aged 6 months, the vast majority of insecurity attached children were actually classed as insecure resistant opposed to avoidant. This pattern is similar to Japan suggesting similarities in child-rearing practices are influential in establishing patterns of attachment
Give a - (LEV)
Lacks ecological validity as it didn’t measure what it. was meant to. However, multiple. different attachments exist. within the same country which wasn’t acknowledged. This suggests Ijzendoorn and Kronburg didn’t account for such differences and so are more likely to be studying differences between countries of attachment patterns, rather than culture
Give a - (SSCB)
Strange situation is culture bound sample was biased so the findings are unlikely to be generalised to other cultures. This is an example of imposed metic because Ainsworth. assumed that the. stages of attachment she developed could be universally applied to all children from all cultures
Give a + (RBLS)
Reliable findings because of large samples used. This replicability increases the validity and faith in conclusions because it decreases the likelihood that. the observed results were one off or due to chance