Cultural Variations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who conducted research into cultural variations?

A
  • Van Ijzendoorn.

- Takahashi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What year did Van Ijzendoorn conduct his research?

A

1988.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn aim to study?

A

Inter-cultural differences (between) and intra-cultural differences (within) in attachment types by using the strange situation methodology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Van Ijzendoorn test his aim?

A

Studied a meta-analysis of findings from 32 studies of attachment behaviour in 8 different countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In Van Ijzendoorn’s study which country had the highest percentage of secure attachment?

A

Great Britain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the highest percentage of secure attachment in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

75%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In Van Ijzendoorn’s study, which country had the lowest insecure-avoidant percentage?

A

Israel and Japan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which country’s findings were the most similar to Ainsworth’s in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

USA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many studies were used to analyse America’s attachment types in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

18.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which countries had a higher percentage of insecure-resistant in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

Israel, Japan, and China.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why may have Israel, Japan, and China scored a higher insecure-resistant percentage in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

They are more orthodox in culture and practices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How many studies were used to analyse China’s attachment types in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which attachment type was most common in each country in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

Secure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How much greater were intra-cultural differences than inter-cultural differences in Van Ijzendoorn’s study?

A

1.5 times greater.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Van Ijzendoor conclude?

A

That the global pattern across cultures is similar to that found in the USA and the differences within cultures are greater than differences between.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What year did Takahashi conduct his research?

A

1990.

17
Q

What was the sample in Takahashi’s study?

A

60 middle-class Japanese infants.

18
Q

What methodology did Takahashi use?

A

The strange situation methodology.

19
Q

What did Takahashi find similar rates of?

A

Secure attachment (66%).

20
Q

What did Takahashi find no evidence of?

A

Insecure-avoidant attachment.

21
Q

What was the percentage of insecure-resistant attachment in Takahashi’s study?

A

34%.

22
Q

What did Takahashi conclude?

A

That the cultural differences were due to different childcare practices in Japan, where infants spend a lot less time away from their mothers.

23
Q

What are the 5 evaluation points of cultural variations?

A

+ Strange Situation is easy to replicate cross-culturally.

  • Raises ethical issues.
  • Ethnocentric.
  • Lacks ecological validity.
  • Meta-analysis can be seen as biased.