Cuban Missile Crisis Flashcards
What are the three key questions to answer?
- Why did Soviet Union place offensive missiles in Cuba?
- Why did the US respond with a naval quarantine?
- Why were the missiles withdrawn?
What is the organisational behaviour approach?
- The processes + culture of large organisations make up a complex government
- Standard operating procedures: outcomes as result of following established routine, not calculated choice
According to the Organisational Behaviour Approach, why did the Soviet Union place offensive missiles in Cuba?
Missiles were not a rational calculation or bargaining chip
But the result of organisational differences
According to the Organisational Behaviour Approach, why did the US respond with a naval quarantine?
Kennedy + his advisors never considered options other than a naval blockade or air strike
Due to organisational differences
According to the Organisational Behaviour Approach, why were the missiles withdrawn?
Soviets had no plan for countering US action -> lack of options made withdrawal the best option
What is the Bureaucratic Politics Approach?
- Policy outcomes result from bargaining + competition among players
- Affected by personalities, relationships, management styles
According to the Bureaucratic Politics Approach, why did the Soviet Union place offensive missiles in Cuba?
Krushchev needed to assert his political dominance and Soviet military dominance
According to the Bureaucratic Politics Approach, why did the US respond with a naval quarantine?
- Domestic pressure compelled Kennedy to pursue an aggressive response
- Kennedy hated the primary advocate for an air strike -> Air Force had less influence
According to the Bureaucratic Politics Approach, why were the missiles withdrawn?
Krushchev tried to save face by focusing on US missiles in Turkey
What are the disadvantages of the Bureaucratic Politics Approach?
- Process not dominated by one individual
- Unlikely to privilege expert or rational decisions
- May result in suboptimal outcomes
- Fail to fulfil objectives of any of participants
- Result in compromises not in best interest of state