Critical Thinking - Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

Uncritical Thinking

A
Automatically
believing what you
read or are told
without pausing to
ask whether it is
accurate, true or
reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Critical Thinking

A
Setting out actively
to understand what
is really going on
by using reasoning,
evaluating evidence
and thinking
carefully about the
process of thinking
itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Skepticism

A
Not
automatically
accepting something
you hear, read or see
as true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Objectivity

A
Setting aside our own 
immediate feelings and 
preferences, and trying 
to identify the relevant 
facts of a situation as 
seen from the outside, 
rather than relying only 
on your own – or 
someone else’s 
– particular feelings or 

point of view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bias

A
Approaching
something in a
one-sided way that
creates a distorted
account of the way
things actually are.  
Looking at things in a 
way that is entirely 
dominated by a 
particular prejudice
or perspective.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conscious Bias

A
When someone
deliberately presents
a one-sided view
of something, or
explicitly holds a
one-sided opinion
about something
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Unconscious Bias

A
When someone’s
opinions or decisions
are distorted by
factors that they are
not even aware of. If, 
however, a bias is 
unconscious, it can be 
extremely difficult even 
to identify, let alone to 
challenge,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What You See

Is All There Is:

A
from Daniel 
Kahneman
the human tendency
to pay attention
only to what is
immediately obvious,
and to neglect the
hidden complexities
that exist in most
situations. Relying 
too much on first 
impressions, feelings 
and the information 
we happen to have 
in front of us.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Survivorship bias:

A
The tendency only
to think about
successful examples
of something,
failing to consider
the bigger picture
in which the vast
majority of all cases
are failures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Confirmation Bias

A
We undervalue evidence 
that contradicts our beliefs
And overvalue evidence 
that confirms them.
The universal human
tendency to use new
information only
to confirm existing
beliefs, rather than
seeking to improve
and clarify your
understanding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dogmatism

A
The claim that certain
principles or ideas
are both absolutely
true and immune
to any form of
critical scrutiny or
discussion - whether 
this dogmatism is
practiced by priests, 
scientists or politicians.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attention

A

The enemy of distraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distraction

A

The enemy of attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reasoning

A
Thinking about 
things in
a sensible or
logical way, and
then presenting
this thinking
so as to permit
meaningful debate,
disagreement and
collaboration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assertion

A
A statement of fact or 
belief, often delivered 
forcibly and provided without 
support or justification. 
It’s also something that, 
on its own, does little 
other than impart 
information.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Argument

A
Persuasion through 
reasoning in
support of a conclusion.
An attempt to persuade
someone through
reasoning that they
should agree with a
particular conclusion.
To attempt to provide 
reasonable justification 
for a particular conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Two elements of an argument

A
Broken down into two 
key elements:
•• You are presented with a line 
of reasoning that…
•• …seeks to convince you to 
accept a particular conclusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Conclusion

A
the final
point that someone
making an argument
is trying to convince
you of.  It's the point that 
everything else leads towards. 
One argument’s conclusion 
can be the starting point of 
another; but each argument 
only has one final conclusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Searching for a conclusion

A
When you’re trying
to work out whether
someone is making
an argument,
begin by seeing if
there is a particular
conclusion they want
to convince you of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Non-argument

A
Any
element of a piece of
writing that does not
attempt to persuade
you of a conclusion
through reasoning,
and thus doesn’t
qualify as part of an
argument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Description

A
Simply
reporting information
without any attempt
at evaluating,
commenting on or
using the information
to persuade.
its purpose 
is to convey relevant 
information as clearly and 
neutrally as possible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Summary

A
A brief
outline of key
information, often
setting out the main
points covered in a
longer piece of work.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Opinion

A
Presenting a 
judgement without
providing reasoning.
Opinions tend to be
personal judgements
based on facts;
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Advice and Warnings

A

Opinions about what
someone should, or
should not, do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Clarification

A
spelling out or 
demonstrating a
particular concept
Spells out what is 
meant by
a particular phrase,
idea or line of
thought
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Illustration

A
Provides
a particular instance
or specific example
to show how the point 
may apply in a particular 
instance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Explanation

A
Reasoning backwards 
from something 
assumed 
to be true. 
Suggests the reason
or reasons that
something came to
be the way it is. 
 Answers "Why?"
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Rhetoric

A
The
attempt to persuade
by appealing to
emotions rather than
by using reasoning.  
A general term for the 
art of persuasive speaking 
or writing, dating back to 
the ancient Roman and 
Greek world.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Six rhetorical techniques

A
Flattery
Appeal to novelty
Appeal to popularity
Appeal to sympathy
Appeal to fear
Jargon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Flattery

A

praising someone in
order to get them to
do what you want.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Appeal to novelty

A

saying that something
is new and so it must
be true or good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Appeal to popularity

A

saying that something

is popular, so it must be true or good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Appeal to sympathy

A

invoking sympathy as a sufficient reason for agreeing with something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Appeal to fear

A

trying to frighten someone

into agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Jargon

A

using fancy, largely
meaningless words in
order to sound smart.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Exaggeration

A
overstating
the case,
often as a rhetorical
tactic; like overgeneralization,
this is
a way of making a far
bigger claim than is
actually the case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Over-generalization

A
suggesting that
something is more
generally true than it
actually is, often as
a rhetorical tactic;
making a far broader
claim than is the
case in reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Incentive-Caused Bias

A
We get whatever we 
reward forPeople with 
a vested 
interest in something 
will tend to guide you 
in the direction of their 
interest.
Incentives influence the 
way people act. Change 
the incentive, and you’ll 
change the behavior.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Commitment & Consistency Bias

A
Our tendency to continue 
to act according to the 
previous commitments 
we’ve made. It’s a reluctance 
to change our course of 
action once we’ve chosen it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

The contrast principle

A
The principle that says, in 
effect, that our judgments 
of things are often biased 
by similar things we have 
seen immediately before. 
The way we judge pretty 
much anything is in 
comparison with something 
else.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Premise

A

a claim
presented by an
argument in support
of its conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Conclusion

A

the final
proposition in any
argument, supported
by its premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Assumption

A
something relevant
to an argument that
has been taken
for granted by the
person presenting it,
rather than spelled
out
44
Q

Principle of Charity

A
the assumption
that someone else
is truthful and
reasonable, and
that their argument
deserves stating in
its strongest form
45
Q

Prejudice

A
holding
a belief without
consideration of
the evidence for or
against it; deciding in
advance of hearing
an argument what
you believe to be the
case
46
Q

Straw Man

A
an
absurd simplification
of someone else’s
position that is
obviously wrong or
stupid, and that is
only expressed so
that it can easily be
defeated
47
Q

Explicit premises

A
all the claims that
someone has set out
in support of their
conclusion.
this is in contrast to 
those things they 
have left unsaid and 
have instead
left to be assumed.
48
Q

Implicit Premises

A
all the claims
not spelled out by
the person stating an
argument, but are
assumed as part of
their reasoning and
need to be included
in reconstruction
49
Q

Claim

A

a statement used
to support one’s
argument.

50
Q

Proposition

A

a statement or
assertion that
expresses a
judgment or opinion.

51
Q

Belief

A
Presenting a 
judgement without
providing reasoning.
Beliefs tend to be
convictions based
on morality, faith or
cultural context
52
Q

Deduce

A

Arrive at (a fact or
a conclusion) by
reasoning

53
Q

Fallacy

A
a flawed
general type of
argument that
establishes a
faulty connection
between premises
and conclusion,
thus failing to give
us a good reason
to accept the
conclusion
54
Q

Fallacious argument:

A
an argument whose
conclusion does
not follow from its
premises, because
its reasoning rests on
an identifiable fallacy
55
Q

Appeal to popularity

A
a fallacious form
of argument based
on the assumption
that whatever most
people think must
be true.
56
Q

Appeal to irrelevant

authority

A
a fallacious
form of argument
based on the
perceived opinion of
an authority without
any expertise in a
relevant area
57
Q

Unwarranted hidden

assumption

A
the
faulty, unstated
element of reasoning
that a fallacy relies
on, and that we aim
to spell out in order
to identify what is
at fault
58
Q

Appeal to nature

A

confusing what you believe is ‘natural’ with a fundamental truth that everyone
ought to accept. Nobody should wash their hair: hygiene is unnatural!

59
Q

Appeal to tradition

A

confusing something that people have done for a long time with something
that must, therefore, be right. There’s nothing wrong with performing surgery without anaesthetic:
people did it for hundreds of years!

60
Q

Argument by

appeal

A
the fallacy
of appealing to
external factors
such as authority or
popularity to justify
a conclusion, rather
than using rigorous
reasoning
61
Q

Ad hominem

A
the
fallacy of attacking
the person making
an argument rather
than what they
actually say
62
Q

Irrelevant conclusion

A
this takes what appears 
to be a satisfactory piece 
of reasoning and then 
provides a conclusion 
that isn’t connected to 
what came before.
63
Q

Equivocation

A
using
a word in two quite
different senses
while pretending that
they are the same
in order to create
the appearance of
reasoning
64
Q

The fallacy of

composition

A
mistakenly arguing
that whatever is true
of the individual
parts must also be
true of the whole
65
Q

The fallacy of

division

A
mistakenly arguing
that whatever is true
of the whole must
also be true of its
individual parts.
This book is amazing 
and insightful. Thus, 
every word in it must 
be amazing and insightful 
as well.
66
Q

Begging the

question

A
putting the
conclusion to
be proven into
your premises,
thus producing
something
convincing-sounding
that proves nothing.
Universal justice is 
a great and noble 
aspiration – and it is 
thus excellent to pursue 
the ideal of just
treatment afforded to all.
67
Q

Circular reasoning

A
an argument whose
premise supports
its conclusion, and
whose conclusion
supports its
premise, making it a
closed loop.
I know that the Bible 
is the word of God, 
because we are told 
by God in the Bible 
that this is so.
68
Q

Post hoc ergo

propter hoc

A
the fallacy of
assuming that, when
one thing happens
after another, the
first thing must be
the cause of the
second thing.
My uncle gave up 
smoking and drinking, 
and two days later he 
was dead. The shock 
must have killed him!
69
Q

Correlation is not

causation

A
the fallacy
of assuming that, if
two phenomena or
sets of data closely
follow one another,
one must be caused
by the other
70
Q

False dilemma

A
fallaciously claiming
that, in a complex
situation, it is only
possible for one of
two things to be true.
You either accept that 
this course of action 
is in the best interests 
of our country, or you 
give hope to our
enemies.
71
Q

loaded question fallacy

A
asking a question
about one thing that
buries some information 
surreptitiously in the 
wording of an argument
in order to force an 
unwarranted assumption 
on someone.
72
Q

Faulty generalization

A
using a small
amount of evidence
to justify a much
larger observation
that isn’t actually
warranted.
I don’t know anybody 
who likes the current 
government. They’re 
hated by the entire nation!
73
Q

Slippery slope

A
arguing on the
basis that, if one
small thing is
allowed to happen,
an inevitable and
increasingly serious
chain of further
events will be set in
motion.
Weed as a gateway.
74
Q

Base rate neglect

A
ignoring the
underlying frequency
of one element in
an analysis, and
thus potentially
reaching an incorrect
conclusion about the
likelihood of a certain
result.
Most ideological 
extremists are angry. 
Few non-extremists are angry. 
This person is angry. So she is
probably an ideological extremist.
75
Q

Heuristic

A
a
cognitive short cut
or ‘rule of thumb’,
allowing for quick
decision-making and
judgement
76
Q

Cognitive bias

A
a
particular situation
in which mental
heuristics introduce
a predictable
distortion into our
assessment of a
situation, resulting in
a flawed judgement
77
Q

Affect heuristic

A
tendency to use
the strength of
positive or negative
emotional reactions
as a decision-making
short cut
78
Q

Availability heuristic

A
a tendency to be
disproportionately
influenced by
whatever most easily
or vividly comes to
mind when making a
decision or assessing
options
79
Q

Recency bias

A
a tendency to
over-estimate the
significance of
more recent things,
because they come
more easily and
vividly to mind
80
Q

Anchoring effect

A
the ability of a
starting value or
frame of reference
to influence your
subsequent
judgements, even
when it has no
relevance to what
you’re considering
81
Q

Focusing effect

A
the
tendency to focus
excessively on one
striking aspect of
something, thus
failing to give full
consideration to a
full range of other
relevant factors
82
Q

Representativeness

heuristic

A
the
tendency to be
influenced by the
plausibility of a story
or characterization,
at the expense of
underlying questions
of its probability.
Linda the bank teller.
83
Q

Stereotype

A
a
commonly held,
simplified and
idealized view
of the typical
characteristics
of something or
someone of a
particular type
84
Q

Social biases

A
a
general term for
instances of bias
in our judgments
about other people,
groups of people, or
social and cultural
institutions.
biases that specifically 
affect our judgements 
about other humans, 
and that can combine 
with structural social 
inequalities to create 
some of our world’s
most urgent injustices.
85
Q

Framing effects

A
the way in which
presenting the same
scenario in different
ways can affect
judgement and alter
preference, based on
perceptions of loss
and gain, positive
and negative
86
Q

Re-framing

A
deliberately selecting
a different way
of presenting
information in order
to challenge the
emphasis created
by a particular initial
framing
87
Q

Loss aversion

A
the observation
that losses are
more painful than
equivalent gains, and
that people thus tend
to be biased towards
loss avoidance when
making decisions
88
Q

Prospect theory

A
people are more 
sensitive to losses 
than they are to gains – 
a sensible enough 
strategy in evolutionary 
terms – and that a 
strong aversion to
perceived loss can 
disproportionately 
influence decision-making.
89
Q

Confirmation bias

A
the tendency to pay
attention only to
things that confirm
our pre-existing
ideas, and to ignore
or seek to explain
away evidence that
contradicts them
90
Q

The sharpshooter
fallacy/clustering
illusion

A
the tendency to see
a pattern where none
exists, by imposing
it after the event
on evidence while
ignoring whatever
doesn’t fit
91
Q

Just world

hypothesis

A
the belief that
everything balances
out in the end
and that the world
is fundamentally
arranged in a way
that is fair
92
Q

Coherence effect

A
the tendency to
judge information
not by its accuracy
or likelihood, but
by how internally
coherent a story
93
Q

Sunk cost fallacy

A
the
tendency to continue
expending energy on
something you are
emotionally invested
in beyond the point
at which it makes
sense to abandon it
94
Q

Dunning–Kruger

effect

A
the tendency
of people with little
or no ability in
an area to greatly
over-estimate their
ability, resulting in
ignorance breeding
unwarranted
confidence
95
Q

Overconfidence

effect

A
the strong
tendency for most
people – and
especially experts
outside their domain
of expertise – to have
excessive faith in
their judgements and
abilities
96
Q

Behavioural

Economics

A
the application
of psychological
insights and methods
to economics,
exploring through
experiment and
observation the reallife
decisions people
make
97
Q

Reversion to

the mean

A
the tendency of an
exceptional result
to be followed by a
less exceptional one,
assuming a normal
distribution of results
over time
98
Q

Fundamental

attribution error

A
the tendency to
disproportionately
view events as the
result of deliberate
actions and
intentions, rather
than as a product of
circumstances
99
Q

Moral luck

A
the paradoxical
observation that 
we often judge someone
harshly in moral terms for 
something that is not under 
their control, even though 
we, at the same
time, accept the idea that 
someone should only be 
held responsible for things 
they can control.
100
Q

Alternative histories

A
all the other
possibilities that did
not play out in real
life, but could have
happened instead
of the events we
actually observed
101
Q

Outcome bias

A
the
tendency to assess
the quality of a
decision once the
result of that decision
is known, rather
than by considering
whether it made
sense at the time
102
Q

Survivorship bias

A
the
tendency only to pay
attention to survivors
and success stories,
creating a distorted
picture that ignores
failures and those
who dropped out
103
Q

Hindsight bias

A
the
tendency to see the
past, in retrospect,
as more predictable
than it actually
was – and to treat
unforeseen events
as though they were
foreseeable
104
Q

Cherry-picking

A
deliberately selecting
a few striking results
or strong effects from
within a larger piece
of research while
suppressing the rest,
thus misrepresenting
the investigation
105
Q

Normal distribution

bell curve

A
also
known as a Gaussian
distribution, this
is a continuous
distribution with a
peak in the middle
of a range of results
that curve away
symmetrically