Critical thinking Flashcards
What are quasi-experiments?
Studies in which we don’t have complete control over certain elements - circumstances lack at least one of the defining characteristics of a true experiment e.g. subjects are SELECTED rather than randomly assigned to conditions, so we have NON-EQUIVALENT GROUPS, experimenter does not have full control over the IV so we can’t be sure what is causing changes in DV
What can we do in non-equivalent control group studies?
Employ pre-testing and post-testing of participants - the DV becomes the CHANGE over a period rather than simply a final score, and we can control for any pre-existing differences between groups
We can also try to test for the significance of any factors we think could influence results
What are two interpretable patterns of results in non-equivalent control group studies?
No diff in pre-test but diff in post-test - difference is very likely to have been caused by the manipulation rather than by any existing differences
Pre-existing differences but go in opposite directions following manipulation
What is a mixed factorial design with one non-manipulated variable?
A design which attempts to control for possible confounds resulting from non-equivalent control groups
We have more than one IV e.g. one may be participant variable of gender while the other is an experimental manipulation (to which subjects can be randomly allocated)
What is an interrupted time series design?
Use publicly recorded data on large numbers of people (archival) in a time-series design on smaller samples
Performance is tracked over several measurements, and in the interrupted design this leads up to introduction of a treatment and then measurements afterwards
Effect is highlighted by a DETECTABLE CHANGE in the DV of interest, and no change in other variables we don’t expect to be affected
What is a repeated treatments design?
Baseline measures taken and a treatment then administered
Treatment then withdrawn and participants return to baseline, before treatment administered for a second time
Group acts as own control
When would we conduct a comparison study?
To provide information on changes in a psychological variable over time, which may provide evidence for developmental theories
What are cross-sectional studies?
Compare samples drawn from distinct sub-groups of a population e.g. different birth years and compare them on a variable at one moment in time
What are some disadvantages of cross-sectional studies?
Non-equivalent groups –> confounding
Can’t detect maturational changes that can confound
Cannot observe changes in SAME individuals
Cohort effects
What are longitudinal studies?
Surmounts issue of group equivalence and employs repeated measures on the same group of people over a substantial period
Can observe genuine changes/stability in characteristics and if check at regular intervals may be able to identify major points of change
What are panel designs?
Longitudinal studies which consider changes in people over time
If samples are taken from the whole population to give ideas of national trends, the sample will be called a cohort
What are key disadvantages of longitudinal studies?
Risk of attrition
Decisions made at start cannot be reversed
Participants become wise to tests (reactivity)
Time consuming and expensive
Cross-generational problems (confounding by secular trends) i.e. change taking place in population over time
What are cross-sequential studies?
Combine both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies
Begins cross-sectional - data collected at one point in time from two or more groups
A follow up is conducted on the groups two or more times, hence the longitudinal aspect
Can help to separate cohort, developmental, and secular effects
What are meta-analyses?
Employ statistical techniques to combine results of hundreds of studies of the same/similar hypotheses/constructs
Studies thoroughly reviewed and sorted and the collated set of acceptable results forms the new data set
Result of each study is treated like a participant result in a single study
Classify and code important characteristics of the studies in relation to research question, and aggregate findings, generating weighted pooled estimates of effect size
What are advantages of single-subject/small n designs?
Don’t distort behaviour as means do
Effects must be large to reach clinical significance
Practical/ethical problems addressed more easily
Flexibility in design