Criminal Procedure Flashcards
Under the 5th Amendment, an incriminating statement obtained as the result of custodial interrogation…
…may not be used against the suspect at a subsequent trial unless the police provided procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination (i.e., informed the suspect of his Miranda rights).
A defendant [can/cannot] be tried for conspiracy and substantive offense for the same T/O at a later trial.
A defendant [can/cannot] be tried for conspiracy and substantive offense for the same T/O at the same trial.
[cannot]
[can]
Two or more offenses by the same defendant may be charged in separate counts of the same indictment or information as long as the charges…
… are based on the same act, transaction, or on two or more acts or transactions that are connected or parts of a common scheme or plan.
Upon motion of […], the court may order multiple defendants charged with participating in contemporaneous and related acts or in a series of acts constituting an offense jointly tried unless […].
[the Commonwealth]
[it would prejudice the defendant]
If prejudice is present, the court must order the prejudiced defendant severed.
What is an Alford plea?
An “Alford” plea is a plea in which a defendant, without admitting guilt, admits that the Commonwealth has sufficient evidence by which the defendant could be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt.
What is an “ask first, warn later” technique, and is it generally permissible?
The “ask first, warn later” technique, where officers question without Miranda warnings and then issue warnings to repeat statements, is generally not permissible as it undermines the suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights.
An unreasonable search occurs when the government…
…(i) invades a place protected by a reasonable expectation of privacy, or (ii) physically intrudes upon a constitutionally protected area to gather information.
A police officer may seize an item in plain view as long if…
(i) the officer is lawfully on the premises,
(ii) the incriminating character of the item is immediately apparent, AND
(iii) the officer has lawful access to the item
A search warrant grants officers authority to search only the…
…places and persons named in it.
In considering a motion to strike out all the Commonwealth’s evidence, all inferences that a jury might fairly draw from the Commonwealth’s evidence […], unless those inferences would be strained, forced, or contrary to reason.
[must be drawn in the Commonwealth’s favor].
The motion should be granted if the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the conviction.
Under what conditions may a defendant waive their right to a jury trial?
The defendant may waive his right to a jury trial upon the advice of his counsel, as long as the Commonwealth attorney and the judge agree and the court determines before trial that the waiver was voluntarily and intelligently given.
The same jury [may/may not] decide both guilt and the sentence.
[may]
But the Judge, upon consent of the defendant and the Commonwealth, can be allowed to determine the sentence.
the Commonwealth bears the burden of proof [by what standard?] that a confession was made after (i) a waiver of the Miranda warnings, and (ii) that the confession was voluntary.
[beyond a reasonable doubt]
Ho does a court assess whether a waiver of Miranda was voluntary?
A review of voluntariness is based on the totality of the circumstances, including the time, length, place, and presence of others.
The defendant’s age, state of health, education, and intoxication are all factors in determining the coercive nature of the confession.
Under the Sixth Amendment, a defendant has the right to […] adverse witnesses, and to […] adverse witnesses.
[directly encounter and cross-examine]
[be present at any stage of the trial that would enable the defendant to effectively cross-examine]
A denial of the opportunity to cross-examine a prosecution witness with regard to bias violates the Confrontation Clause.