Criminal Law Second Term - THEFT EXTRA Flashcards

1
Q

R v Feely test for dishonesty

A

‘ordinary, decent people’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is s.2(1)(a) based on under old law?

A

Colour of right defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is s.2(1)(c) based on under old law?

A

Finder’s defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a huge disadvantage of the Ghosh test?

A

Means D can get off by saying ‘but I thought everyone did it’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did MPs try to claim under the Ghosh test?

A

‘Office culture’ of lying on expenses form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What shows the popularity of the Ghosh test among judges?

A

Element of common law offence of conspiracy to defraud due to popularity with judges despite issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the legal principle that Ghosh undermines?

A

Article 6 ECHR and RoL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In what two cases was the joint enterprise and fundamental difference rule so confusing that written guidance and flow charts were needed?

A

Fury and Badza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Simester and Sullivan argue about JE’s relationship with aiding, abetting and counselling?

A

Completely not connected - JE requires a common purpose, requiring D to foresee rather than just encourage/help Crime B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Michael Moore on derivative liability?

A

Fundamentally at odds with the idea that criminal liability is based on personal responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why would subjectivists object to complicity?

A

Relies on moral luck - D should be liable for what they have planned to help, regardless of what P does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case did Powell and English overrule?

A

R v Chang Wing-Siu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Powell and English overrule Chang Wing-Siu?

A

Said that there is a JE regardless of if the action is authorised or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When does the fundamental difference rule not apply (due to D’s acts)?

A

If D sees the new weapon and continues (R v Uddin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Uddin

A

Cannot use fundamental difference rule if D sees the new weapon and continues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who do S&S think would have supported abolition of insanity?

A

Thomas Szasz

17
Q

Why would Szasz perhaps have supported the abolition of insanity?

A

Termed mental illness a convenient myth exploited by the ‘ill’

18
Q

What did Norval Morris say of insanity?

A

If mental condition precludes MR, unqualified acquittal; if dangerous, then civil commitment (Mental Health Act and if MR, then convict and take disorder into account afterwards

19
Q

Who suggests an alternative to insanity defence?

A

Norval Morris - making use of civil commitment

20
Q

Under what Act do medical witnesses support disease of mind for insanity?

A

Criminal Procedures (Insanity and Unfit to P…) Act

21
Q

What is the evidence under the CP(I and UtP)A for insanity?

A

From medical witnesses on LEGAL guidelines for insanity

22
Q

What did Sutherland and Gearty highlight about Article 5 ECHR about insanity?

A

Evidence under the CP(I and UtP)A is not sufficient for ‘objective medical expertise’ as they follow legal, not medical, guidelines

23
Q

Who showed insanity defence does not always match Article 5 ECHR?

A

Sutherland and Gearty

24
Q

Why is the burden of proof on the defendant for DR and insanity?

A

Presumption of sanity

25
What case under DR confirmed that ICD 10 and DSM are not conclusive for DR recognised medical condition?
R v Dowds
26
Under what law was Dietschemann decided?
Old law of diminished responsibility
27
What would Dietschemann now need to decide under new law of DR?
That grief was a causal factor
28
What did the Law Com No.304 suggest about DR?
Provision for developmental immaturity of D
29
Why did the government reject the suggestions in Law Com No.304?
Ministry of Justice thought that conditions like autism etc were covered already under recognised mental condition
30
What section did Law Com No.304 recommend on?
DR
31
Under what Schedule of the CJA are the minimum periods for murder covered?
Schedule 21
32
Why couldn't UAMS be used in R v Dobinson?
Neglect (R v Lowe)
33
Who argued that preoccupation should not defeat recklessness unless recklessness is inappropriate anyway?
Williams (bike idea)
34
What did Gardner argue about imminence and threats for assault, agreeing with Horder?
They are unnecessary requirements to the essential wrong of causing harm
35
What two academics argued that the imminence requirement of assault is unnecessary?
Gardner and Horder
36
How has Ashworth's criticism in 'Criminal Liability in a Medical Context' partly been implemented?
Said doctors should have a defence as socially justified (e.g. contraception to under 16s) - now in s.73 SOA
37
What kind of question is the issue of whether D failed or did something in breach of his duty under GNMS?
Factual - left to the jury
38
Who argued that derivative liability is fundamentally at odds with the foundation of criminal law - personal responsibility?
Michael Moore