Criminal Law - Property Offences Flashcards
Theft definition
S1 Theft Act 1968 - a person is guilty of theft is they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive
Dishonestly
S2 Theft Act 1968 (part of the mens rea)
There is no definition but there are exceptions
A) D believes they have a right in law to deprive - R v Robinson
B) they believe they would have had Vs consent if they knew - Boggeln v Williams
C) they believe the person who own the property cannot be recovered buy taking reasonable steps - R v Small
The belief must be honest, but not necessarily reasonable
If none of these apply we use the Ivey 2-part test
What is the Ivey 2-part test
Established in Ivey v Genting Casinos
1) what was the actual state of the defendant’s knowledge or belief as to the facts (subjective and determined by jury)
2) in context of 1, was D’s conduct dishonest by the standard or the ordinary reasonable person
Confirmed in R v Barton and Booth
Appropriates
S3 Theft Act 1968
Taking on the rights of the owner
S3(1) - any assumption of the rights of the owner
R v Morris - any assumption of rights, not all
R v Pitham and Hehl - selling is assuming rights
Atakpu v Adams - there is not continuing act, appropriation can only happen when the act happens first
Property
S4 Theft Act 1968
Property includes: money, real property, personal property (R v Welsh), things in action (R v Hilton)
Things that are not property
Intellectual property - Oxford v Moss
S4(3) - cannot steal wild plants unless for commercial gain
S4(4) - wild creatures are not property unless being tamed
Electricity
Body parts unless they’re being used by others - R v Kelly and Lindsay
Belonging to another
S5
Must have possession and control - R v Turner (doesn’t have to be lawful)
Can include when D didn’t know it was there - R v Woodman
Proprietary interest - R v Webster
Abandonment - R v Rostron
Exceptions
S5(3) - property renewed under obligation (R v Hall/R v Davidge and Bunnett)
S5(4) - property received by mistake, you are under obligation to return it (R v Gresham)
With intention to permanently deprive
S6 Theft Act 1968 - part of the mens rea
If someone disposes of something or treats it as their own they have intention to permanently deprive - DPP v Lavender
There must be conditional intent - R v Easom
Intention to sell or ransom property back to V - R v Rafael
Intention to replace with identical property - R v Lloyd
Intention to abandon property - R v Mitchell
Intends to part with property but cannot be sure of its return - R v Fernandez
What is the definition of robbery?
S8 Theft Act 1968 - a person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so and in order to do so uses force on any person OR seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force
What is the mens rea of robbery?
Dishonest intention to steal to permanently deprive
D must intend to use force to steal
R v Forrester - accidentally used force while stealing, not robbery, just theft
Steals (robbery)
Must be a completed theft
R v Robinson
R v Waters
Corcoran v Anderson
Immediately before or at the time of doing so (robbery)
If force is used immediately after the theft as a continuing act then that can count as part of robbery
R v Hale
R v Lockley
In order to steal (robbery)
The force must be in order to steal the thing they initially intended to steal
Uses force on any person (robbery)
What most people would understand force to be
However the victim must not be passive (they must try and prevent it)
R v Dawson and James
R v Monaghan and Monaghan
R v Clouden
Smith v Desmond
Seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force
B and R v DPP
Where is burglary defined?
S9(1a) and S9(1b)