Criminal Law and Procedure Flashcards
Merger of Crimes
Only solicitation and attempt merge into substantive offense.
No merger for conspiracy – separate crime.
Essential Elements of a Crime
1) Physical act (actus reus): own volition, but not reflective, convulsive or unconscious; and
2) Mental state (mens rea).
What are the Specific Intent Crimes?
BAM ACTS
1) Burglary
2) Assault
3) Murder (1st degree)
4) Attempt
5) Conspiracy
6) Theft
7) Solicitation
Malice Crimes
Reckless disregard of obviously high risk of harm. (Murder/Arson)
General intent Crimes
Awareness of all factors constituting crime.
e.g. awareness of act or high likelihood it will occur
Strict Liability Crimes
No required awareness.
Transferred Intent
Two charges – attempt and offense.
Accomplice Liability
Liable for crime itself and all foreseeable crimes.
Requires active involvement (e.g. aid, counsel or encourage, with intent to aid).
Solicitation
Asking someone to commit crime.
Requires intent for person to commit the crime.
Crime ends at the asking – if other person accepts, it becomes conspiracy.
Conspiracy
(1) Agreement; (2) intent to agree; (3) unlawful obj.
MAJ jurisdictions require overt act.
Liability: all foreseeable crimes committed to further conspiracy.
Withdrawal: requires (1) affirmative act notifying all members of withdrawal and (2) assistance in neutralizing. Cuts off liability for subsequent crimes of co-conspirators, not conspiracy itself.
Attempt
Specific intent to commit + substantial step beyond mere preparation.
Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:
Insanity
Defense to all, including Strict Liability.
D has burden of production.
Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:
Intoxication:
Voluntary → Only defense for Specific Intent. Involuntary → Like insanity. Is defense to all, incl SL.
Requires:
1) Taking drugs/alcohol;
2) w/o knowledge, under duress, or pursuant to med advice without awareness of intoxicating effect.
Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:
Infancy:
If < 7 → no liability.
If < 14 → rebuttable presumption of no liability.
Insanity Tests:
M’Naghten
At time of conduct, D lacked ability to know wrongfulness of actions or nature/quality of actions.
Insanity Tests:
Irresistible Impulse
D lacks capacity for self-control & free choice, or unable to conform conduct to the law.
Insanity Tests:
MPC/ALI
D lacked capacity to (i) appreciate criminality of conduct or (ii) conform conduct to req’ts of law.
Insanity Tests:
Durham Rule
D’s conduct was product of mental illness.
Excuses/Justification:
Self Defense
Non-deadly – if reasonably necessary.
Deadly – (i) D without fault; (ii) confronted w/ unlawful force; (iii) reasonably believe to be threatened w/ imminent death/great bodily harm.
Minority – retreat unless in person’s home; making lawful arrest; or victim of rape/robbery. But, original aggressor must withdraw and communicate withdrawal.
Excuses/Justification:
Defense of others
Person assisted reasonably appeared to have legal right to use force in his own defense.
Excuses/Justification:
Defense of property
Non deadly force OK. No force allowed to regain possession unless in hot pursuit.
Excuses/Justification:
Crime Prevention
Non deadly force to prevent felony or breach of peace. Deadly force only to prevent dangerous felony.