Criminal Law and Procedure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Merger of Crimes

A

Only solicitation and attempt merge into substantive offense.

No merger for conspiracy – separate crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Essential Elements of a Crime

A

1) Physical act (actus reus): own volition, but not reflective, convulsive or unconscious; and
2) Mental state (mens rea).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the Specific Intent Crimes?

A

BAM ACTS

1) Burglary
2) Assault
3) Murder (1st degree)
4) Attempt
5) Conspiracy
6) Theft
7) Solicitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Malice Crimes

A

Reckless disregard of obviously high risk of harm. (Murder/Arson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General intent Crimes

A

Awareness of all factors constituting crime.

e.g. awareness of act or high likelihood it will occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strict Liability Crimes

A

No required awareness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transferred Intent

A

Two charges – attempt and offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Accomplice Liability

A

Liable for crime itself and all foreseeable crimes.

Requires active involvement (e.g. aid, counsel or encourage, with intent to aid).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Solicitation

A

Asking someone to commit crime.

Requires intent for person to commit the crime.

Crime ends at the asking – if other person accepts, it becomes conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conspiracy

A

(1) Agreement; (2) intent to agree; (3) unlawful obj.

MAJ jurisdictions require overt act.

Liability: all foreseeable crimes committed to further conspiracy.

Withdrawal: requires (1) affirmative act notifying all members of withdrawal and (2) assistance in neutralizing. Cuts off liability for subsequent crimes of co-conspirators, not conspiracy itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Attempt

A

Specific intent to commit + substantial step beyond mere preparation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:

Insanity

A

Defense to all, including Strict Liability.

D has burden of production.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:

Intoxication:

A

Voluntary → Only defense for Specific Intent. Involuntary → Like insanity. Is defense to all, incl SL.

Requires:

1) Taking drugs/alcohol;
2) w/o knowledge, under duress, or pursuant to med advice without awareness of intoxicating effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defenses Negating Criminal Capacity:

Infancy:

A

If < 7 → no liability.

If < 14 → rebuttable presumption of no liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Insanity Tests:

M’Naghten

A

At time of conduct, D lacked ability to know wrongfulness of actions or nature/quality of actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Insanity Tests:

Irresistible Impulse

A

D lacks capacity for self-control & free choice, or unable to conform conduct to the law.

17
Q

Insanity Tests:

MPC/ALI

A

D lacked capacity to (i) appreciate criminality of conduct or (ii) conform conduct to req’ts of law.

18
Q

Insanity Tests:

Durham Rule

A

D’s conduct was product of mental illness.

19
Q

Excuses/Justification:

Self Defense

A

Non-deadly – if reasonably necessary.

Deadly – (i) D without fault; (ii) confronted w/ unlawful force; (iii) reasonably believe to be threatened w/ imminent death/great bodily harm.

Minority – retreat unless in person’s home; making lawful arrest; or victim of rape/robbery. But, original aggressor must withdraw and communicate withdrawal.

20
Q

Excuses/Justification:

Defense of others

A

Person assisted reasonably appeared to have legal right to use force in his own defense.

21
Q

Excuses/Justification:

Defense of property

A

Non deadly force OK. No force allowed to regain possession unless in hot pursuit.

22
Q

Excuses/Justification:

Crime Prevention

A

Non deadly force to prevent felony or breach of peace. Deadly force only to prevent dangerous felony.