Constitutional Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Federal Judicial Power: Justiciability

A

A SPERM:

Abstention 
Standing 
Political Standing 
Eleventh Amendment/Sovereign Immunity 
Ripeness 
Mootness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Justiciability:

Abstention

A

Fed can’t enjoin pending State Court proceeding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Justiciability:

Standing Requirements

A

Requirements: (Pickled Doughnuts Cause Reflux)

1) Personal & Direct Injury;
2) Causation;
3) Redressibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Justiciability:

Third Party Standing

A

No Third party standing except- if (i) close relationship; and (ii) injured 3rd party unlikely to assert his own rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Justiciability:

Associational Standing

A

1) Individuals have standing;
2) Germane to organization’s purpose; and
3) Neither claim nor relief requires participation of individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Justiciability:

Political Question

A

Will not adjudicate challenges to:

1) Amendments;
2) Foreign policy;
3) Republican form of government;
4) Impeachment; or
5) Partisan gerrymandering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Justiciability:

11th Am/Sovereign Immunity

A

States can’t be sued in Fed Ct unless:

1) Fed gov’t sues;
2) Express waiver; or
3) Congress clearly removes immunity.
4) State sues another State
5) Suing state official re: abuse of power for enforcement of unconstitutional law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Justiciability:

Ripeness

A

Some violation of law or when nothing to be gained with actual violation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Justiciability:

Mootness

A

Must be live controversy.

Except:

1) Wrongs capable of repetition but evading review;
2) Voluntary cessation;
3) Class actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the Federal Legislative Powers?

A

Police Power

General Welfare

Commerce Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federal Legislative Power:

Police Power

A

None except MILD:

Military; Indian reservations; Land (Fed); and District of Columbia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Federal Legislative Power:

General Welfare

A

May only tax and spend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Federal Legislative Power:

Commerce Power

A

(1) Channels of interstate commerce (IC);
(2) Instrumentalities of IC;
(3) Substantial effect on IC (cumulative impact for economic activity only).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Federal Legislative Power:

Limitations

A

10th Amendment - Can’t compel states to regulate or act, but may induce with strings on grants if expressly stated & related to purpose.

14th Amendment – Congress can’t create new or expand existing rights. Only prevent or remedy violations of existing rights if proportionate/congruent to violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the Federal Executive Powers?

A

1) Treaties
2) Executive Agreements
3) Appointments
4) Removal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Federal Executive Powers:

Treaties

A

Must be ratified by Senate but no Senate approval required to void.

Conflicts:

State law – State law is invalid.

Fed law – Last adopted controls.

US Constitution – Treaty invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Federal Executive Powers:

Executive Agreements

A

No Senate approval needed.

Conflicts:

State law – State law is invalid.

Exec Agreement never valid over conflicting Fed law or Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Federal Executive Powers:

Appointments

A

President appoints: (i) ambassadors, (ii) Fed judges, and (iii) exec officers with Senate confirmation.

Congress may vest appointment authority but may not give itself appointment power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Federal Executive Powers:

Removal

A

Unless limited by statute, President can fire exec officer.

Congress may limit if independence from President desirable AND may only limit removal with good cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Impeachment

A

Removed for treason, bribery, and high crimes & misdemeanors.

Requires majority house vote and conviction in Senate by 2/3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Supremacy Clause:

A

Constitution and laws/treaties made pursuant to it are supreme.

Express or Implied (either Fed/State law mutually exclusive; State law impedes on Fed objective; or Congress evidences clear intent to preempt).

Tax: can’t pay state tax out of Fed treasury, but can tax private store on Fed land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

State or local law is unconstitutional if it places excessive burden on interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause of Art IV

A

State may not deny citizens of other states of the privileges and immunities it accords its own citizens.

Limit – corps and aliens can’t sue under P&I.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Individual Liberties:

State Action

A

Required before Constitutional provisions applied to private entities.

Occurs if excessive state financial entanglement or where entity performs public function.

Entanglement = gov’t authorizes, encourages, or facilitates activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Levels of Scrutiny:

Rational Basis

A

Rationally related to legitimate gov’t interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Levels of Scrutiny:

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

Law must be substantially related to an important gov’t interest.

Must be narrowly tailored to achieve objective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Levels of Scrutiny:

Strict Scrutiny

A

Law must be necessary to achieve a compelling state interest.

Must be least restrictive means necessary to achieve objective.

28
Q

Procedural Due Process

A

Deprivation of life, liberty or property (only if entitlement)?

If yes, balance:

1) Importance of interest to individual;
2) Ability of additional procedures to increase accuracy of fact finding;
3) Gov’t interest in fiscal & admin efficiency.

29
Q

Substantive Due Process:

Economic Liberties

A

Rational basis, limited protection.

30
Q

Substantive Due Process:

Contracts Clause

A

State/local law effecting already existing Ks → intermediate scrutiny:

1) Substantial impairment of K relationship;
2) Whether state law is designed to promote a significant and legitimate public purpose; and
3) Narrowly tailored?

31
Q

Substantive Due Process:

Takings Clause

A

5th Amendment provides that private property may not be taken for public use without just compensation.

32
Q

Substantive Due Process:

What Constitutes a Taking?

A

(1) Denial of all economic value or (2) decrease of economic value that leaves no economically viable use for the property.

Court considers:

1) The social goals;
2) Diminution in value to owner; and
3) The owner’s reasonable expectations.

If reduction in value > promotion of pub welfare → taking.

33
Q

Substantive Due Process:

Taking for Public Use

A

Must be rationally related to a legitimate public purpose.

If not, gov’t must pay for land or give land back + damages.

34
Q

Substantive Due Process:

What are Fundamental Rights? (Require Strict Scrutiny)

A

1) Contraception
2) Abortion
3) Right to Privacy
4) Procreation
5) Speech
6) Parenting/Custody
7) Extended Family together
8) Rights under First Amendment
9) Marriage

35
Q

Substantive Due Process:

Abortion

A

Before viability → no prohibition, but regulation OK so long as not an undue burden.

After viability → states may prohibit unless necessary to protect life of mother.

Spousal notice/consent → unconstitutional.

Parental notice/consent for minors OK, but only if alternative judicial approval process.

36
Q

Equal Protection:

Constitutional Provisions (State/Local vs. Federal)

A

State/Local → 14th Amendment.

Fed → 5th Amendment Due Process Clause.

37
Q

Equal Protection:

Race/National Origin

A

Exists if: Discrim on face or discrim impact + intent. Strict Scrutiny: Set asides/quotas (requires clear proof of past discrim and congruent remedy).

College Admissions: Race can be a factor b/c of compelling interest of diversity, but may not simply add pts or have a set aside.

Public secondary schools: Not OK.

Apportionment: Consideration OK but can’t be predominant.

38
Q

Equal Protection:

Gender:

A

Exists if: Discrim on face or discrim impact + intent. Intermediate Scrutiny.

Role Stereotypes: Not OK.

Remedial measures: OK if designed to address past discrim and difference in opportunity.

39
Q

Equal Protection:

Alienage:

A

Strict Scrutiny (generally).

BUT re: self gov’t/democratic process → Rational Basis (e.g. voting, jury service, being police or elementary/secondary teacher).

Undocumented Alien Children → Intermediate Scrutiny (right to education).

40
Q

Equal Protection:

Non-Marital Children

A

Intermediate Scrutiny.

41
Q

Equal Protection:

Right to Travel

A

Strict Scrutiny ( e.g. preventing people from moving or residency req’ts).

42
Q

Equal Protection:

Right to Vote

A

Strict Scrutiny.

At large elections OK unless proof of discrim purpose

43
Q

Equal Protection:

Political Candidacy

A

Fee can’t preclude indigent.

Ballot access regs must be reasonable and non discrim means of promoting important state interest.

44
Q

Equal Protection:

When is Rational Basis Applied?

A
Age 
Disability 
Wealth/Economic 
Sexual Orientation 
Education
45
Q

First Amendment:

Restrictions on Speech Content Based vs. Content Neutral

A

Content based→ Strict Scrutiny.

Two types:

Subject matter - Law restricts topic of speech. Viewpoint - Restricts specific ideologies. Content Neutral → Generally intermediate scrutiny.

46
Q

First Amendment:

Prior Restraints

A

Judicial order or admin system stopping speech before it occurs.

47
Q

First Amendment:

Prior Restraints (Preliminary Injunctions)

A

Strict Scrutiny.

Requires:

1) Narrowly drawn, reasonable & definite;
2) Injunction promptly sought;
3) Prompt and final determination.

Person must act according to injunction until overturned. If in violation, no challenge.

48
Q

First Amendment:

Prior Restraints (Licenses/Permit)

A

Must be no discretion in licensing authority.

Must contain procedural safeguards like prompt determination of requests for licenses and judicial review.

49
Q

First Amendment:

Facially Invalid Regulations

A

Vagueness: Reasonable person can’t tell what is prohibited/allowed.

Overbreadth: Regulates substantially more speech than Constitution allows.

Unfettered discretion: Too much power given to licensing authority.

Note: Fighting word bans are unconstitutional as vague and overbroad.

50
Q

First Amendment:

Symbolic Speech

A

Conduct that communicates.

Test: Reg OK if (1) Important state interest independent of suppression of message; and (2) Impact on communication no greater than necessary. (Intermediate Scrutiny)

Types: Flag burning protected. Draft card and nude dancing not protected. Burning cross protected unless done with intent to threaten. Contribution limits OK; expenditure limits unconstitutional.

51
Q

First Amendment:

Lesser Protected Speech: Incitement of Illegal Activity

A

Punishable if (1) Substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity; and (2) Speech directed to causing imminent illegality.

52
Q

First Amendment:

Lesser Protected Speech: Obscenity

A

Test: PIPS – Prurient Interest. Patently offensive. Serious value (lack of).

Prurient interest = Local standard of shameful and/or morbid interest in sex.

Patently offensive = Local standard.

Serious value = No redeeming artistic, literary, political or scientific value based on national reasonable person standard.

53
Q

First Amendment:

Obscenity – Zoning Restrictions

A

OK to regulate location and size of adult bookstores and movie theaters in order to target secondary effects.

54
Q

First Amendment:

Profane and Indecent Language

A

Generally protected, except:

Broadcast Media: Radio station/free network TV because of intrusiveness into home and accessibility by kids.

Schools: Responsibility of teaching civilized discourse.

55
Q

First Amendment:

Commercial Speech

A

Truthful commercial speech always protected.

False and deceptive ads not protected.

Test: Intermediate scrutiny – (1) Serves substantial gov’t interest; (2) Directly advances that interest; (3) Narrowly tailored to serve that interest (need not be least restrictive)

56
Q

First Amendment:

Defamation:

A

Libel and slander not protected.

Public official: Must show falsity and actual malice. Public figure: Same as public official.

Private figure: If public concern, must show falsity and negligence. If no public concern, no malice necessary.

57
Q

First Amendment:

Freedom of Press/Privacy

A

Truthful Public Info: No restrictions so long as info was lawfully obtained by gov’t records.

Illegally intercepted calls: Media no liability so long as media didn’t participate in illegality and re: matter of public importance.

Access to Gov’t: Gov’t may limit dissemination of info to protect privacy.

Gov’t Papers: No req’t for public accessibility.

Crim Trials: Public and press have right to attend, but may be limited by overriding interest determined by judge based on intermediate scrutiny.

58
Q

Forums for Speech:

Public Forums

A

Includes parks, sidewalks, etc.

Regs must be subject matter and viewpoint neutral. If not → Strict Scrutiny.

Regs must serve important gov’t purpose and leave open adequate alternate places for communication.

59
Q

Forums for Speech:

Designated Public Forums:

A

Gov’t properties which gov’t allows open for speech. Same requirements as public forums.

60
Q

Forums for Speech:

Limited Public Forums

A

Gov’t properties limited to certain groups or dedicated to discussion of limited topics.

Regs OK if reasonable and viewpoint neutral.

61
Q

Forums for Speech:

Non-Public Forums

A

Includes military bases, outside prisons, sidewalks on post office property, ad space on city buses, airports, etc.

Regs OK if reasonable and viewpoint neutral.

62
Q

Freedom of Association:

Prohibit/Punish Group Membership

A

Strict Scrutiny.

Requires: AAA (knowing + specific intent)

1) Actively Affiliated with group;
2) Knowing of illegal Activities;
3) Specific intent of furthering illegal activities.

63
Q

Freedom of Association:

Disclosure of Group Membership

A

If chilling effect → Strict Scrutiny.

64
Q

Freedom of Association:

Prohibition of Discrimination

A

Constitutional unless interferes with intimate association (small groups) or expressive association (discrim integral to expressive activity of group, e.g. KKK).

65
Q

Freedom of Religion:

Free Exercise Clause

A

No punishment on basis of religious beliefs.

But Free Exercise can’t be used to challenge neutral laws of general applicability, except denial of unemployment benefits if person quit for religious reasons or Amish who have right not to educate children.

If not generally applicable or if enacted to discriminate → Strict Scrutiny.

66
Q

Freedom of Religion:

Establishment Clause

A

Lemon test: SEX. (1) Secular purpose; (2) Effect neither advances nor inhibits religion; (3) No eXcessive entanglement with religion.

No discrimination against religious speech or among religions unless Strict Scrutiny.

School: No gov’t sponsored religious activity. BUT, religious groups must be given same access to school facilities.

67
Q

Public Employment

A

Public concern → Balance employee’s rights as citizen against gov’t interest in efficient performance of public service.

Not public concern → Wide deference to employer judgment.

If within employee duties → Punishment OK.

No firing for party affiliation unless in policy making position.