Criminal Law Flashcards
Murder
A Homicide committed with Malice
Homicide
Killing of another human caused by defendant
Vicarious Liability for Criminal Liability
A defendant may be liable for the crime of another if the defendant;
- solicits the crime; or
- as a conspirator with the one who commits the crime; or
- is an accomplice to the one who commits the crime; or
- under Felony murder rule
Malice
The mental state required for murder:
- Intent to kill; or
- Intent to inflict great bodily harm; or
- Depraved Heart; or
- Felony Murder Rule
Depraved Heart
Reckless indifference to a known high risk of death
Felony Murder Rule
Homicide committed during the perpetration of an inherently dangerous felony
Inherently Dangerous Felonies
BARRK
Burglary, Arson, Rape, Robbery and Kidnapping
Involuntary Manslaughter
A homicide committed without malice under one of the following circumstances:
- Intent to inflict Slight bodily injury
- Gross Negligence
- Misdemeanor-Manslaughter Rule
Misdemeanor-Manslaughter Rule
Defendant kills while committing a non inherently dangerous felony or a inherently wrongful misdemeanor.
Self Defense (Criminal Law)
The defendant may use deadly force to protect against an imminent deadly attack. Deadly force must be reasonable and necessary to repel the attacker.
Defense of Others (Criminal Law)
Defendant can use deadly force if reasonable and necessary to defend another.
Crime Prevention Defense
A police officer or private person may use deadly force if reasonably necessary to prevent the commission of a dangerous felony
Apprehension/Arrest of a Criminal Defense
A police officer or private person may use deadly force if reasonably necessary to prevent apprehend/arrest a dangerous felon.
Reasonable Mistake Defense
A defendant may use deadly force based on a reasonable mistake as to self-defense, defense of others and crime prevention.
Excuse defense
if a homicide or any other crime is excused, the defendant is not criminally liable. Can be excused by
- Youth/infancy
- Insanity
- Intoxication
M’Naghten Test
Insanity Test
Defendant, as a result of mental defect or disease, did not know of the wrongfulness of his act or could not understand the nature and quality of his acts.
Irresistible Impulse Test
Insanity Test
Defendant, as a result of mental defect, was unable to control his conduct or conform his conduct to the law.
Insanity Model Penal Code Test
Defendant lacked the substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.
Durham Test
Insanity Test
Defendant is not guilty if his crime was the product of a mental disease or defect.
Voluntary Intoxication Defense
Exists when the defendant voluntarily and knowingly consumes an intoxicating substance. Can negate specific intent but only if the defendant is so intoxicated he cannot form the specific intent for the required crime.
Involuntary Intoxication Defense
Exists when the defendant involuntarily or unknowingly become intoxicated. Defense to all crimes if the intoxication renders the defendant “insane” under the applicable test.
Mitigation
An intentional killing that would otherwise be murder will be mitigated to voluntary manslaughter under Heat of passion or Good Faith mistake.
Heat of Passion
Defendant experiences adequate provocation. must be one would cause subjective and objective passion and no “cooling off” period.
Good Faith Mistake
A defendant who intentionally kills victim under good faith, but unreasonable mistaken belief as to self defense, defense of others or crime prevention can successfully argue their homicide crime should be mitigated to voluntary manslaughter
First Degree Murder
Homicide that has:
- Premeditatation and Deliberate Intent to Kill or
- Felony Murder Rule
Second Degree Murder
All murders that do not qualify as first degree murder.