Criminal Law Flashcards
Malice Crimes
Murder and Arson (M.A.lice)
Specific Intent Crimes
FIAT: First-degree murder Inchoate crimes Assault (w/ attempt to commit battery) Theft offense
Inchoate Crimes
CATS:
Conspiracy
ATtempt
Solicitation
Trick within Merger
felonies merge into felony merger
Common Law w/r/t Children Presumptions
At common law, children under the age of 7 were never capable of committing a crime;
children ages 7-14 were rebuttably presumed to be incapable of committing crimes; and
children at least 14 years old could be charged as adults.
Exception to Accomplice Liability
people protected by a statute cannot be accomplices (e.g. statutory rape law)
Aiders / Abettors and Conspiracy
In addition to accomplice liability for the substantive crime, individuals who aid or abet a defendant to commit a crime may also be guilty of the separate crime of conspiracy if there was an agreement to commit the crime and an overt act was taken in furtherance of that agreement.
Exceptions to Mistake of Law Rule
1) Reliance on high-level government interpretations of the law
2) Lack of notice (only w/ new malum prohibitum crimes)
3) Mistake of law that goes to an element of specific intent (applies only to the “FIAT” crimes or specific-intent crimes)
Mistake of Fact w/r/t levels of intent
o Strict Liability: Mistake of fact is not a defense
o General Intent: Mistake of fact is a defense only if the mistake is reasonable and it goes to the criminal intent.
o Specific intent: Mistakes of fact are a defense any time the defendant actually held the mistaken belief, whether it was reasonable or unreasonable.
Insanity: M’Naghten Test
Defendant either did not know the nature of the act or
did not know that the act was wrong
Insanity: Irresistible Impulse Test
Defendant has a mental disease
or defect that means the defendant cannot control himself
Insanity: Durham Rule
Defendant would not have committed the crime but-for his having a mental disease or defect (∆ friendly, rarely used today)
Insanity: Model Penal Code
Due to a mental disease or defect, the defendant did not have substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his acts or to conform his conduct to the law
Intoxication
Involuntary Intoxication: Can be a valid defense to general intent, specific intent, and malice crimes when it negates the mens rea necessary for those crimes.
Voluntary Intoxication: Voluntary intoxication is a defense only to specific-intent crimes (FIAT crimes), and only if it prevented the defendant from forming the mens rea; Not a valid defense if the defendant got drunk in order to commit the crime
Conspiracy: Chain vs. Wheel
liable for the chain, but not other spokes on wheel