Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Specific Intent Crimes

A
  • Assault
  • Larceny
  • Robbery
  • Burglary
  • Solicitation
  • Conspiracy
  • Attempt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Malice Crimes

A
  • Manslaughter and can also be heat of passion

* Rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Attempt

A

To commit a crime – state must establish 2 things:

  1. Actual intent to commit the crime
  2. Behavior that got the defendant in close proximity (very near) the completed crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Aiding and Abetting

A
  • Help and intent to have crime to take place
  • Encourage

• Victim rule: Can’t convict someone if they were in the class of people that the statute was designed to protect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Solicitation

A
  • Ask another to commit a crime with the intent of that person to commit the crime
  • NOTE: Solicitation is a crime even if it is immediately rejected by person who solicits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conspiracy

A

ELEMENTS:
• ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT to commit a crime; AND
• With the INTENT that the crime be committed
• Modern statutes often require an OVERT ACT in furtherance by one member of the group.

  • Co-conspirators are liable for both the conspiracy and substantive offenses committed in furtherance of the conspiracy
  • A withdrawal will get the defendant off the hook for all substantive crimes after withdraw but does not get the defendant off the hook for conspiracy – HAVE TO WITHDRAW W/CONSPIRATORS
  • To have a successful withdrawal, person must voluntarily give it up and communicate that to all co-conspirators in time to change their plans
  • A defendant can be found guilty for conspiracy and substantive offense if did not properly withdraw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Robbery

A

Intentional taking and carrying away the personal property of another by force or intimidation from other’s person or presence with intent to deprive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Larceny v. Embezzlement

A

When dealing with theft by an EE – answer choice is embezzlement or larceny
• If LOW LEVEL EE that has control over property for a LIMITED PERIOD of time then larceny
• If HIGH LEVEL EE that has control over property for EXTENSIVE PERIOD of time then embezzlement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

6 exceptions to warrantless searches

A
  1. Search incident to lawful arrest - Can be conducted in immediate area of defendant
  2. Consent
  3. Automobile search - Have to have probable cause to search
  4. Plain View
  5. Stop and Frisk - Need reasonable suspicion
  6. True emergency - Lives in danger or destruction of evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Even if search unreasonable, evidence is not suppressed in the following situations:

A

• Police in good faith believed that the warrant was valid, but warrant turns out to be invalid still not suppress evidence
• Evidence used at proceeding other than a trial on the merits:
1. Impeachment
2. Grand jury proceeding
3. Preliminary hearing
4. Sentencing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stop and Frisk

A

• Reasonable suspicion okay then anything illegally subsequently observed through sight or touch then able to size illegal items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 types of confessions that result in constitutional violation and have a remedy as suppression

A

3 types of confessions that result in constitutional violation and have a remedy as suppression • Involuntary Confession: Government can’t use confession in case in chief against defendant and can’t use the confession if the defendant takes stand to impeach
• Confessions in violation of Miranda: Violation and remedy is that can’t use it in case in chief, but CAN use it to impeach the defendant
• Confessions that violate the right to counsel: Once judicial proceedings begin then NO CONVERSATION and NO INTERROGATION unless counsel present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What must be proven during trial:

A
  • State must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt – elements include each piece of behavior, mental state, any result found in definition of crime.
  • Defense to criminal charge that one element of crime is missing the defendant raise reasonable doubt missing (i.e., mental state – not meet)
  • All other defenses – state can if it wants to require the defendant to prove that proof by preponderance of the evidence (i.e., mental illness, necessity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Double jeopardy – 3 issues deal with:

A

o When does jeopardy attach the first proceeding
• Jury trial – when jury sworn
• Bench trial – when parties announce ready and defendant enters plea
o Assuming jeopardy attached are there exceptions that will allow the prosecutor to try that offense again
• Ended in hung jury
• Convicted and appeals and makes request for second trial that is granted
• First trial ended in mistrial that did not result from the prosecutors misconduct
• Mistrial for manifest necessity – when no prosecutor misconduct
o What exactly same offense mean:
• If each of two crimes requires proof of a fact that the other does not they are not the same offense for purposes of double jeopardy and can be convicted of both crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Right to jury trial

A

In serious offense have right to jury trial
o Serous offense = Maximum sentence is more than 6 months

6 person jury can be used but must be unanimous decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Right to counsel

A

o Felony

o Misdemeanor when jail sentence actually imposed