Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Elements of a crime

A

1) Actus reus (voluntary act)

2) Mens rea

3) Causation
3-1) Actual (but-for) cause AND
302) Proximate cause (Negligence/recklessness crimes: within the risk created; Intentional crimes: harm is similar to harm intended)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Omissions – when is there a duty to act?

A

Statutory duties (cops)

Legal duty by contract (lifeguards)

Special status (parent/child, husband/wife)

Voluntary undertaking to rescue that is abandoned

Failing to help after creating risk (hit & run)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Excuse defenses

A

Insanity

Intoxication

Duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duress defense

A

D reasonably believes that the only way to avoid an unlawful IMMINENT threat of SERIOUS bodily injury or death is to commit an unlawful act

Doesn’t apply to murder (except felony murder)

An excuse defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Voluntary intoxication

A

Defense against specific intent crimes only

Note that this includes attempt!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Insanity

A

M’Naghten Test

Irresistible Impulse Test

MPC/Substantial Capacity Test

Burden on D to prove by clear and convincing evidence (fed law) or preponderance of evidence (most state law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Unforeseeable intervening events

A

Breaks causal chain

Gross negligence by third parties

Complete coincedences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

M’Naghten Test

A

At time of offense, D suffered severe mental disease or defect and thus was UNABLE TO KNOW either

1) Nature or quality of act (didn’t know what they were doing)

2) Didn’t know what they were doing was wrong

Note: Does not include psychopathic personalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Irresistible Impulse Test

A

D isn’t guilty is mental disease stopped him from controlling conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MPC/Substantial Capacity Test

A

Mental disease/defect that makes D lack SUBSTANTIAL CAPACITY to appreciate criminality or to conform conduct to the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-defense

A

1) HONEST (subjective) and REASONBLE (objective) judgment that force is needed to defend against bodily harm

2) Harm must be IMMINENT

3) force must be PROPORTIONATE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Unclean hands defense

A

No right to self-defense if D created the dangerous situation

Common law/majority: right to self-defense is regained if you retreat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defense of others

A

Same right to defend others as you have to defend yourself. Insert yourself into victim’s shoes.

Reasonable mistake = safe (majority rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defense of property

A

Reasonable non-deadly force allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Necessity defense

A

1) Must avoid GREATER HARM

2) NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE to breaking law

3) Was NOT RESPONSIBLE for creating crisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Crimes against property

A

Larceny
Robbery
Larceny by trick
Embezzlement
False pretenses
Extortion
Receiving stolen property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Burglary

A

Breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony within

18
Q

Arson

A

1) Actual malice (intentionally or recklessly)

2) Causing thing to burn

3) that causes property damage (actual change in property, icky soot isn’t enough)

19
Q

Receiving stolen property

A

Must be reasonable doubt that receiver knew it was stolen

20
Q

False pretenses

A

1) D says FACT that is knowingly false

2) which induces P to transfer TITLE

3) D INTENDS for P to transfer title

21
Q

Embezzlement

A

1) Conversion

2) with intent to permanently deprive

22
Q

Larceny by trick

A

P takes possession by larceny plus P must rely on D’s misrepresentation

23
Q

Robbery

A

Larceny plus

1) taking from the victim’s person and…

2) through force/threat of force that places victim in ACTUAL FEAR at time of taking

24
Q

Larceny

A

1) taking

2) with intent to permanently deprive

Includes damaging a thing.

Returning the thing later doesn’t matter

25
Q

Crimes against the person

A

Battery
Assault
Rape
Kidnapping
Aggravated battery/mayhem
Felony assault
False imprisonment

26
Q

Battery

A

Unlawful application of force to the victim

general intent crime

Elevated to aggravated battery if D causes serious bodily injury, uses deadly weapon, or attacks special category of person (kid, cop, pregnant woman)

27
Q

Rape

A

Penetration without consent

Defense: HONEST (subjective) and REASONBALE (objective) mistake of fact that the person wasn’t consenting

28
Q

Assault

A

Intend to batter (and fail) or intentionally cause victim to fear imminent battery

A specific intent crime

29
Q

Aggravated battery/Mayhem

A

Intent to maim or bodily injury, and you permanently disfigure somebody (modern majority)

30
Q

Kidnapping

A

Abducting by means of force or threat of force. Must also take someone to another location.

31
Q

False imprisonment

A

INTENTIONAL confinement without reasonable means of escape.

32
Q

Premeditation

A

Must be some form of reflection but can be very slight

33
Q

Deliberation

A

Deliberate choice to kill with some kind of rational thought.

34
Q

Malice

A

Intent to kill, proved by:

Deadly weapon doctrine

Depraved heart

Felony murder

35
Q

Deadly weapon doctrine

A

Intent to kill assumed if you sue deadly weapon or use weapon in a way likely to cause death or serious bodily harm

36
Q

Depraved heart

A

Intent to kill assumed if recklessly/gross negligence and an EXTREME risk to death or bodily injury.

37
Q

Voluntary manslaughter

A

Intentional killing with adequate provocation. Adequate provocation is both objective (would make reasonable person fly into a rage) and subjective (in fact did make D go into rage)

Mere words are not enough

38
Q

Solicitation

A

Trying to get someone else to commit your crime.

Crime is complete as soon as the communication is made.

Do they actually do the crime? Solicitation turns into ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY

39
Q

Conspiracy

A

1) 2 or more people

2) meeting of the minds

3) one person commits overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy

Partial defense: withdrawal + withdrawal communicated

40
Q

Pinkerton doctrine

A

Every conspirator is guilty of 1 conspirator’s crime if

1) Crime is a foreseeable outcome of conspiracy

2) Crime is in furtherance of conspiracy’s goals