Criminal damage Flashcards
Definition of simple criminal damage
Without lawful excuse intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging property belonging to another
When is property usually seen as having been damaged/destroyed?
When expense must be incurred in rectifying the consequence
What are the MR elements of simple criminal damage?
- intention/recklessness as to the destruction/damage of property belonging to another, and
- knowledge/belief that the property belongs to another
Which offences does lawful excuse apply to?
Simple criminal damage and arson (not aggravated!)
2 situations where lawful excuse arises
- honest belief that the person entitled to consent would’ve consented if knew of circumstances
- honestly believed the property was in immediate need of protection, and the means adopted were reasonable
Definition of arson
Without lawful excuse intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging property belonging to another by FIRE
What is the difference between the MR elements of criminal damage and aggravated damage (an arson and aggravated arson)?
The aggravated offences have an extra MR element of intention/recklessness as to endangerment of life
3 differences between criminal damage and arson and their aggravated counterparts?
Aggravated offences:
- have the extra MR element of intention/recklessness as to endangerment of life
- cannot rely on lawful excuse
- don’t have to be to property belonging to another