criminal damage Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what year was the criminal damage act

A

1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the law relating to criminal damage

A

a person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any such property belonging to another intention to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many sections of the criminal damage act is there

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the three sections in the act

A

section one-basic
section two- aggravated
section three-arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is section one basic criminal damage

A

damage/destruction of property belonging to another- intention/ reckless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is section two aggravated criminal damage

A

with intention to endanger life or being reckless as to whether life is endangered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is section three arson criminal damage

A

defined as destroying or damaging property by fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the actus reus of criminal damage

A

consists of damaging or destroying property belonging to to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what will the jury decide in the actus reus

A

whether or not the property has been damaged and the extent of the damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what case relates actus reus of criminal damage

A

R v Fiak 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what happens in the case R v Fiak 2005

A

prisoner blocked toilet in cell and floors two other cells he had caused damage to the blanket and the cells which could not be used until they were clean LP- even if damage can be fixed it would still be an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the men’s rea of criminal damage

A

the intention to raise damage or destroy property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what happens if the defendant acted recklessly in the men’s rea

A

apply a subjective test by asking did the defendant realise the risk and decide to take the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what case related to the men’s rea of criminal damage

A

R v G and another 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what happened in the case R v G and another 2003 relating to the men’s rea

A

defendant set fire to a newspaper and didn’t realise it would speed it then spread to bin and shops they were convicted under section 1 and 3 house of lords quashed the conviction stating that appropriate test should be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the actus reus of criminal damage that is aggravated

A

defendant damaged or destroyed any property, with intent to endagner life or cause serious injury

17
Q

what is the men’s rea of aggravated criminal damage

A

intention or recklessness related to damaging or destroying property and intention related to endangering life

18
Q

what is the case that related to aggravated criminal damage

A

R v Dudley 1989

19
Q

what happens in the case R b Dudley 1989 relating to aggravated criminal damage

A

D the petrol bomb as house D was convicted LP- actus reis and mens rea were established as he threw the bomb and he intended to endanger life by fire damage

20
Q

what is the actus reus of arson criminal damage

A

damage or destruction caused by fire

21
Q

what is the men’s tea of arson criminal damage

A

intention or recklessness as to damaging property belonging to another by fire

22
Q

what a lawful excuse

A

he believed that the person believed to be entitled to consent to the destruction or damage
he destroyed or damaged the perpetrating question in order to protect property belonging to himself or another